On representation of the internal spherical functions and their derivatives in the planetary coordinate system

: pp. 251–257
Received: March 25, 2019
Accepted: September 23, 2019
Lviv Polytechnic National University
Lviv Polytechnic National University
Lviv Polytechnic National University

The expressions of spherical functions and their derivatives in a Cartesian coordinate system are obtained.  In opposite to the representation of polynomials in a spherical coordinate system, the derived recurrence relations make it possible to use them in the description of physical processes, and the obtained formulae for derivatives of spherical functions within the sphere allow obtaining the solutions to the problems of mathematical physics for spherical bodies in a Cartesian coordinate system.  This approach has its advantages precisely in the applied problems.  For example, for  the determination of the  artificial satellites orbits, it is necessary to represent the external potential of gravitation and its derivatives for the GPS systems in a Cartesian coordinate system.  Investigation of the internal structure of Earth and astrometric studies of processes in galaxies are associated with the study of internal potential, and, consequently, there is a necessity for its presentation in the Cartesian coordinates.

  1. Abrikosov O.  On computation of a derivatives of the Earth's gravitational potential for satellite geodesy and geodynamics.  Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies. 2 (2), 51--58 (1986).
  2. DeWitt R., NAVAL WEAPONS LAB DAHLGREN VA.  Derivatives of Expressions Describing the Gravitational Field of the Earth.  Defense Technical Information Center  (1962).
  3. Antonov V., Baranov A.  Relation between the expansions of an external potential in spherical functions and spheroidal harmonics.  Technical Physics. 47 (3), 361--363 (2002).
  4. Kholshevnikov K., Shaidulin V.  Existence of a class of irregular bodies with a higher convergence rate of Laplace series for the gravitational potential.  Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy. 122 (4), 391--403 (2015).
  5. Meshcheriakov G.  Problems of the potential theory and generalized Earth. Moscow, Nauka (1991).
  6. Hofmann--Wellenhof B., Moritz H.  Physical Geodesy. Wien, Springer--Verlag (2006).
  7. Cunningham L.  On the computation of the spherical harmonic terms needed during the numerical integration of the orbital motion of an artificial satellite.  Celestial mechanics. 2 (2), 207--216 (1970).
  8. Fys M., Zazuliak P., Zajats O.  Do pytannia vyznachennia kuliovykh funkcii v zagalnoplanetarnii systemi coordynat.  Suchasni dosiagnennia geodesychnoi nauki ta vyrobnyctva. 7, 401--408 (2004).
  9. Hobson E. W.  The theory of spherical and ellipsoidal harmonics.  Cambridge University Press (1931).
Mathematical Modeling and Computing, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 251–257 (2019)