The above-mentioned problems are primarily determined by the importance of using legal prohibitions as methods and methods of legal regulation designed to ensure the normal development and existence of society and relations that arise both in society and in the state as a whole. In connection with the difficult political, economic and social situation that has developed in Ukraine, and which is caused by the fact that the country is in a state of hostilities, the loss of part of the country's territory, as well as the systematic, thorough implementation of reforms in all spheres of public life, with the aim of reaching the level of legal support that would correspond to the level of a European country, the use (establishment) of legal prohibitions increased in legislative activity.
The problem of legal prohibitions as a special legal method, or even a tool used to regulate social relations, has been studied and highlighted since the time of the formation of the state. In fact, legal prohibitions arose together with society, and were the first social norms, the task of which was to insert mandatory rules of behavior, as a result of which the process of protecting the rights and freedoms of society took place. Legal prohibitions due to their simplicity in understanding and ease of implementation have shown their effectiveness in practice.
Based on the analytical understanding of a large array of professional publications that to one degree or another relate to the subject of research, taking into account the peculiarities of the source legal framework, on the basis of which specific historical events of a state-political and legal nature took place, choosing the most optimal methodology for the study and analysis of historical, social, state- of legal and legal phenomena, a comprehensive solution to the problem of formation and development of prohibition as a method of legal regulation, relevant for the science of legal theory, was carried out.
1. Erlikh Yе. (1911). Pro zhyvuche pravo. [On tenacious law]. Lviv : T-vo Ukrainsko-Ruskykh Pravnykiv. 14 p. [in Ukrainian].
2. Kharytonova O. V. (2010). Kryminalno-pravovi pohliady O. F. Kistiakivskoho: naukova spadshchyna tayii znachennia dlia suchasnykh kryminalno-pravovykh doslidzhen. [Criminal and legal views of O. F. Kistyakivsky:
scientific heritage and its significance for modern criminal law research]: monohrafiia . Khаrкіv : Pravo. 252 p. [in Ukrainian].
3. Ostapenko O. I. (2018). Pro zaborony ta obmezhennia v administratyvnomu pravi. [On prohibitions and https://doi.org/10.23939/law2018.894.051 restrictions in administrative law]. Visnyk NU "Lvivska politekhnika". Seriia: Yurydychni nauky. Nо. 2. Vyp. 5. P. 51-59 [in Ukrainian].
4. Bych L. (1947). Zahalna nauka prava. [General Law Science] : kurs lektsii. Rehensburh; Frankfurt, CH. 2. 186 p. [in Ukrainian].
5. Eikhelman O. (1927). Osnovy prava. [Fundamentals of law]. Praha : UVU. 49 p. [in Ukrainian].
6. Okinshevych L. (1987). Vstup do nauky pro pravo i derzhavu. [Introduction to the Science of Law and the State]. (Ukrainskyi Vilnyi Universytet. Seriia: Pidruchnyky; Ch. 10). Miunkhen. 223 p. [in Ukrainian].
7. Vorontsova Yу. V. (2022). Kryminalno-pravovi zaborony shchodo provedennia ta orhanizatsii azartnykh ihor i loterei na tli zmin rehuliatyvnoho zakonodavstva Ukrainy. [Criminal and legal prohibitions on the conduct
and organization of gambling and lotteries against the background of changes in the regulatory legislation of Ukraine]. Visnyk LDUVS im. E. O. Didorenka. Vyp. 1. P. 2070-215 [in Ukrainian].
8. Buromenska N. L. (2019). Mizhnarodno-pravove rehuliuvannia pryntsypu zaborony zlovzhyvanniam pra- vom: naukovo-teoretychnyi aspect. [International-legal regulation of the principle of prohibition of abuse of law: scientific and theoretical aspect]. Visnyk Pivdenno rehionalnoho tsentru Natsionalnoi akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy. Nо. 19. P. 171-179 [in Ukrainian].
9. Pohorilko V. F., Fedorenko V. L. (2014). Konstytutsiine pravo Ukrainy. [Constitutional Law of Ukraine] : pidruchnyk. 5-te vyd. pererob. i dopovn. Kуіv : "Lira K". 560 p. [in Ukrainian].
10. Starchuk O. (2014). Poniattia ta vydy pryntsypiv-zaboron u systemi osnovopolozhnykh zasad trudovoho prava Ukrainy. [Concept and types of prohibitions in the system of fundamental principles of labor law of Ukraine]. Aktualni problemy tsyvilistyky. Nо. 1(3). P. 88-92 [in Ukrainian].
11. Luk'ianets D. (2010). Pro spivvidnoshennia metodu administratyvnoho prava ta metodiv administraty- vno-pravovoho rehuliuvannia. [On the relationship between the method of administrative law and methods of administrative and legal regulation]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. V.N. Karazina. Seriia Pravo. Nо. 845. P. 288-291 [in Ukrainian].
12. Onyshchuk I. I. (2017). Pravovyi monitorynh: problemy metodolohii teorii ta praktyky. [Legal monitor- ing: problems of methodology of theory and practice] : monohrafiia. Ivano-Frankivsk; Drohobych: Kolo. 512 p. [in
Ukrainian].
13. Tarakhonych T. I. (2002). Mekhanizm pravovoho rehuliuvannia. [Mechanism of legal regulation]. Pra- vova derzhava. Vyp. 13. P. 103-109 [in Ukrainian].
14. Lepekh L. L. (2013). Vymohy do pravovoho rehuliuvannia. [Requirements for legal regulation]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Nо. 21. Ch. 1. P. 67-70 [in Ukrainian].