The concept and socio-legal value of the reconciliation of the parties in the administrative judiciary of Ukraine

2024;
: 327-331

Citation APA: Slyvka M. (2024) The concept and socio-legal value of the reconciliation of the parties in the administrative judiciary of Ukraine. Bulletin of Lviv Polytechnic National University. Series: Legal Sciences. Vol. 11, No. 1(41), pp. 327-331.https://doi.org/10.23939/law2024.41.327

Authors:
1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Educatinoal and Rasearch Institute of Law, Psychology and Innovative Education

The article is aimed at research of the concept and socio-legal significance of the reconciliation of the parties in the administrative proceedings of Ukraine. On the basis of legal methods of scientific knowledge, such as: dialectical, logical-formal, comparative-legal, etc., modern approaches to understanding the legal nature and essence of the concept of "reconciliation" are considered. It is proposed to consider the reconciliation of the parties in administrative proceedings as based on the principles of law and the norms of the current legislation, a voluntary and quick way of amicable (peaceful) agreement by the parties of a public-law dispute on mutually beneficial terms of reconciliation in a judicial procedure (without prejudice to the idea of people-centeredness and legality), which are approved by an administrative court. The socio-legal significance of reconciliation is highlighted, which is manifested in the fact that: 1) reconciliation of parties in administrative proceedings allows to properly use the positive potential of the dispute and to settle the public-law dispute in an amicable (peaceful) manner; 2) conciliation of the parties in administrative proceedings allows saving the time and money resources of the parties to the dispute and the court; 3) the reconciliation of the parties in administrative proceedings contributes to the pluralistic increase in the degree of democratization of administrative-legal dispute resolution and the transformation of the role of the judge. It is noted that the sooner the parties reach a consensus, the less time the court will spend on considering the case, which contributes to: a) actual savings in the amount of state expenses for resolving cases in court; b) increasing the amount of "free" time resource. It is indicated that there is a need to update the scientific opinion regarding the concept and socio-legal significance of the reconciliation of the parties in administrative proceedings in the conditions of the European integration of Ukraine. It was concluded that the introduction and spread of conciliation of the parties in administrative proceedings is a certain civilizational transformation of the understanding of justice, as well as the role of the judge in the resolution of public legal disputes, which is a reflection of the pluralistic tendency to expand the methods of resolving public legal disputes, which is observed today in the states - EU members.

  1. Gry`czayenko O. L. (2019). Do py`tannya al`ternaty`vny`x sposobiv vregulyuvannya publichno-pravovogo sporu [To the question of alternative methods of settlement of a public legal dispute]. Naukovi zapy`sky` L`vivs`kogo universy`tetu biznesu ta prava. Seriya : Yury`dy`chna. T. 23. P. 122-126. doi:10.5281/ zenodo.3678787 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Sy`dyel`nikov O. D. (2017). Insty`tut pry`my`rennya storin v administraty`vnomu sudochy`nstvi [Institute of conciliation of parties in administrative proceedings] : dy`s. … kand. yury`d. nauk : 12.00.07. Xarkiv. 200 p. [in Ukrainian].
  3. Plugatar T. A., Katayeva E. V. (2016). Napryamy` vdoskonalennya pravovogo regulyuvannya yury`sdy`kciyi administraty`vny`x sudiv Ukrayiny` [Directions for improving the legal regulation of the jurisdiction of administrative courts of Ukraine]. Nauka i pravooxorona. № 4. P. 82–89 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Joly-Hurard J. (2003). Conciliation et mediation judiciaires. Aix-en-Provence : Presses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille. 476 p. Retrieved from: URL: https://books.openedition.org/puam/679 (accessed: 15.01.2024). [in France].
  5. Korecz`ky`j I. O. (2017). Pry`ncy`p zmagal`nosti storin v administraty`vnomu sudochy`nstvi [The principle of competition between parties in administrative proceedings] : dy`s. … kand. yury`d. nauk : 12.00.07. Ky`yiv. 223 p. [in Ukrainian].
  6. Sly`vka V. V., Sly`vka M. M. (2022). Vply`v yevrointegraciyi Ukrayiny` na pry`my`rennya storin v administraty`vnomu sudochy`nstvi [The influence of the European integration of Ukraine on the reconciliation of parties in administrative proceedings] : monografiya. L`viv: Kamenyar. 201 p. [in Ukrainian].
  7. Belando Garín B. (2015). La mediación administrativa: Una realidad jurídica. Las prestaciones patrimoniales públicas no tributarias y la resolución extrajudicial de conflictos. València : INAP. P. 265–273. [in Spain].
  8. Chabanol D. (2017). Les modes non juridictionnels de règlement des litiges en droit administratif français. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu. G. 54, № 1. S. 13–22. [in France].
  9. Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrayiny (2005, July 06) № 2747-IV [Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15#Text (accessed 15.01.2024). [in Ukrainian].