Modeling the geoid and polar motion in geological tim

https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2024.02.045
Received: June 05, 2024
1
Engineering geodesy department of Lviv Polytechnic National University
2
Lviv Polytechnic National University
3
Engineering geodesy department of Lviv Polytechnic National University
4
Engineering geodesy department of Lviv Polytechnic National University
5
Lviv Polytechnic National University

The main objective of our research is to: 1) conduct a correlation analysis of the relationship between geoid heights and topographic heights in the modern era using calculated moving correlation coefficients (MCC); 2) extrapolate the obtained correlation model to past geological epochs and determine the paleogeoid using known surface heights derived from paleoDEM continental reconstruction models (Scotese and Wright, 2018); 3) perform calculations of changes in "True Polar Wander" (TPW) based on the obtained paleogeoid height data sets resulting from the movement of lithospheric plates. Methodology. To investigate the correlation between geoid heights and lithospheric surface heights, data for 1ºx1º trapezoids from the EGM2008 model, topographic heights from ETOPO1, and paleoDEM paleoreconstruction models were used. The center of the moving window was shifted by 1º in both latitude and longitude within grids of 3ºx3º and 9ºx9º, reflecting the global nature of the correlation and mitigating local variations. By extrapolating the modern correlation model to past geological epochs, we investigate the dynamic paleogeographic evolution and its impact on the geoid structure. To study the dynamics of changes in the Earth's lithospheric shape, paleogeoid heights, and pole position, the concept of approximating their surfaces with a semi-parameterized biaxial ellipsoid was used. Results. Based on the calculated MCC values, a map of the correlation between geoid heights and topographic heights for the modern era was constructed. We conducted a detailed correlation analysis for different epochs – 200, 400, and 540 million years ago, as well as for intervals from the modern era to 540 million years ago, in 5 million-year steps, using paleogeoid models. This analysis was used to hypothesize about the secular movement of the Earth's rotational poles and the associated dynamics of the lithosphere. Scientific Novelty. The modeling of paleogeoid heights was performed for further assessment of the Earth's pole displacement. We also discuss the impact of gravitational and rotational forces on the internal structure of the Earth, from the lithosphere to the inner core, suggesting cyclic geodynamic instability manifested as secular variations in the Earth's shape and gravitational field. Our conclusions indicate a subtle understanding of the relationship between tectonic activity and paleogeoid anomalies, suggesting minimal direct influence of lithospheric plate movements on geoid height changes, but significant indirect influence through mantle convection over geological time. Practical significance. This study not only provides deeper insight into the historical configuration of the Earth's geoid and continents but also enhances our understanding of the dynamic processes shaping the current and future geodynamic evolution of the planet.

  1. Adhikari, S., Caron, L., Steinberger, B., Reager, J. T., Kjeldsen, K. K., Marzeion, B., Larour, E., & Ivins, E. R. (2018). What drives 20th century polar motion? Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 502, 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.08.059
  2. Chase, C., & Sprowl, D. (1983). The modern geoid and ancient plate boundaries. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 62(3), 314-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(83)90002-X
  3. Courtillot, V. (2007). True polar wander. In D. Gubbins & E. Herrero-Bervera (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism (pp. 956–969). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4423-6_308
  4. Courtillot, V., & Besse, J. (2004). A long-term octupolar component in the geomagnetic field? (0–200 Million Years B.P.). Geophysical Monograph Series, 145, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1029/145GM05
  5. ETOPO1 Global Relief Model. (n.d.). National Centers for Environmental Information. Retrieved from https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/global/global.html
  6. Gold, T. (1955). Instability of the Earth's axis of rotation. Nature, 175, 526–529. https://doi.org/10.1038/175526a0
  7. Lambeck, K. (1980). The Earth's Variable Rotation: Geophysical Causes and Consequences. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511569579
  8. Pavlis, N. K., et al. (2008). An Earth gravitational model to degree 2160: EGM2008. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 10, EGU2008-A-01891, EGU General Assembly. P. 2. https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2012.01.042
  9. Ricard, Y., Spada, G., & Sabadini, R. (1993). Polar wandering of a dynamic earth. Geophysical Journal International, 113(2), 284-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1993.tb00888.x
  10. Scotese, C. R. (2017). Atlas of Oceans & Continents: Plate Tectonics, 1.5 by – Today. PALEOMAP Project Report 112117A. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/321197460
  11. Scotese, C. R., & Wright, N. (2018). PALEOMAP paleodigital elevation models (PaleoDEMS) for the Phanerozoic PALEOMAP Project. Retrieved from https://www.earthbyte.org/paleodem-resource-scotese-and-wright-2018/
  12. Steinberger, B., Seidel, M.-L., & Torsvik, T. (2017). Limited true polar wander as evidence that Earth’s nonhydrostatic shape is persistently triaxial. Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 827–834. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071937
  13. Stacey, F. D., & Davis, P. M. (2008). Physics of the Earth. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812910
  14. Tserklevych, A. L. (2013). Correlation analysis of gravitational field and topography of terrestrial planets. Geodynamics, 1(14), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2013.01.011 [in Ukrainian]
  15. Tserklevych, A. L., Fys, M. M., Shylo, Ye. O., & Zaiats, O. S. (2022). Planetary geodynamics: shape, gravitational field, internal structure of the Earth and planets of the terrestrial group: monograph. - Lviv: Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House. 336 p.. [in Ukrainian]
  16. Tserklevych, A. L., Zayats, O. S., & Shylo, Y. O. (2016). Approximation of the physical surface of the earth by biaxial and triaxial ellipsoid. Geodynamics, 1, 40-49. https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2016.01.040
  17. Tyapkin, K. F., & Dovbnich, M. M. (2009). New rotational hypothesis of structure formation and its geological and mathematical justification. Noulidzh. (in Ruaaian). http://www.evgengusev.narod.ru/fluidolit/tyapkin-2009.html