This article analyzes the possibilities for exercising the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion in Ukraine during martial law. It emphasizes that although Ukraine is a secular state with constitutionally enshrined separation of church and state, this does not negate its obligations to ensure this right. On the contrary, the secular nature of the state requires a set of legal and organizational measures to guarantee everyone’s right to freedom of belief.
Based on a study of the legal doctrine and practice of the European Court of Human Rights, the article emphasizes the role of the state in legislatively ensuring this right, which includes guaranteeing ideological diversity while maintaining the state’s neutrality with regard to religion and equality of confessions.
The article highlights the dualistic nature of the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion provided for by Ukrainian national legislation. The internal aspect (forum internum), which covers the right to have, accept, or change religion, is interpreted as an absolute right that is not subject to restriction and is realized at the level of an individual’s internal beliefs and feelings. The external aspect (forum externum), which includes the right to individual and collective religious worship, although protected by the state, may be subject to reasonable legislative restrictions.
In summary, it is concluded that ensuring the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, which complies with both national and international standards, is a priority for the state even in conditions of martial law. In view of this, attention is drawn to the need to develop and adopt at the state level legislation regulating the procedure for referral to alternative (non-military) service during mobilization. This requires appropriate amendments to the current legislation of Ukraine, integrating international experience and the practice of the ECHR, in order to prevent the forced imposition of beliefs and violation of the principle of freedom of conscience.
1. Vasin, M. Mobilizatsiia viruiuchykh i alternatyvna sluzhba pid chas viiny: pytannia ta vidpovidi [Mobilization of believers and alternative service during wartime: questions and answers]. 19.03.2022. Retrieved from: https://irs.in.ua/p/103 (Аccessed: 30.03.2025). [In Ukrainian].
2. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [The Constitution of Ukraine] vid 28.06.1996 r.: stanom na 08.01.2025 r. Baza danykh “Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy” / VR Ukrainy. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96- %D0%B2%D1%80#Text (Accessed: 08.01.2025). [In Ukrainian].
3. Сase of Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and others v. Moldova : ECHR, 13.12.2001р (Application No. 45701/99). Retrieved from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22appno%22:[%2245701/99%22],%22itemid%22: [%22001-59985%22]} (Аccessed: 30.05.2025). [In English].
4. Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod [Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms]: mizhnar. dok. vid 04.11.1950 / Rada Yevropy. Uriadovyi kurier. 2010. 17 lystop. No. 215. [In Ukrainian].
5. Patrioty Ukrainy: Ukrainets vidmovyvsia vid mobilizatsii do ZSU cherez relihiiu i buv zasudzhenyi do trokh rokiv viaznytsi, ale ne zdavsia (25 zhovtnia 2024 r.) [Patriots of Ukraine: A Ukrainian man refused to be mobilized into the Armed Forces of Ukraine on religious grounds and was sentenced to three years in prison, but he did not give up (October 25, 2024)]. Retrieved from: https://web.ccu.gov.ua/novyna/patrioty-ukrayiny-ukrayinecvidmovyvsya-vid... (Аccessed: 36.05.2025). [In Ukrainian].
6. Samoilenko A. Alternatyvna sluzhba pid chas viiny: Venetsianska komisiia vidpovila Ukraini [Alternative service during wartime: Venice Commission responds to Ukraine]. Retrieved from: https://glavcom.ua/country/society/ alternativna-sluzhba-pid-chas-vijni-venetsianska-komisija-vidpovila-ukrajini--1050239.html (Аccessed: 27.05.2025). [In Ukrainian].
7. Uropean Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission). Ukraine – Amicus curiae brief on alternative (non-military) service. Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 142nd Plenary Session (Venice, 14– 15 March 2025). CDL-AD(2025)006-e. Retrieved from: https://www.coe.int/en/web/venice-commission/-/ukraineamicus-curiae-brie... (Аccessed: 27.05.2025). [In English].
8. Enver Aydemir v. Turkey: ECHR, 07.06.2016. (Application No. 26012/11). HUDOC. Retrieved from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/#{%22tabview%22:[%22document%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-163456%22]} (Аccessed: 27.05.2025). [In English].
9. Venice Commission: There is a right to refuse military service on grounds of consciencе. Retrieved from: https://unn.ua/en/news/venice-commission-there-is-a-right-to-refuse-mili... (Аccessed: 29.05.2025). [In English].
10. Postanova Kasatsiinoho kryminalnoho sudu v skladi Verkhovnoho sudu [Decision of the Cassation Criminal Court within the Supreme Court] vid 15.04.2025 r. (sprava No. 573/406/24). Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/126906863 (Аccessed: 30.05.2025). [In Ukrainian].
11. Proekt Zakonu pro vnesennia zmin do statti 23 Zakonu Ukrainy “Pro mobilizatsiinu pidhotovku ta mobilizatsiiu” shchodo zabezpechennia konstytutsiinoho prava hromadian na alternatyvnu (neviiskovu) sluzhbu [Draft Law on Amendments to Article 23 of the Law of Ukraine “On Mobilization Preparation and Mobilization” regarding ensuring the constitutional right of citizens to alternative (non-military) service]. Retrieved from: https://itd.rada.gov.ua/BILLINFO/Bills/Card/44641 (Аccessed: 30.05.2025). [In Ukrainian].
12. Pyroha, I. S., Bielova, M. V., Fridmanska, F. I. (2025). Alternatyvna (neviiskova) sluzhba v umovakh voiennoho stanu [Alternative (non-military) service under martial law]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu. Seriia PRAVO. Vyp. 87: chast. 1. P. 173–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2307- 3322.2025.87.1.24 (Аccessed: 30.05.2025). [In Ukrainian].