: 23-31
Lviv polytechnic national university, Department of Design and Basics of Architecture

Consideration of contemporary urban environment aesthetics is also closely linked to the category of heritage, which is growing in importance and is expanding. The concept of heritage itself is, in turn, a modern phenomenon that emerged only in the nineteenth century and is largely linked to the formation of political nations. Based on comparative analysis, has been traced the transformation of the concept of heritage in modern and postmodern discourse. Also, has been identified the relationship between exclusive and inclusive models of understanding the historical value of an architectural object in the context of understanding the aesthetics of the urban environment.

It is determined that due to the significant extension of the typology and the number of heritage objects, the concept of urban aesthetics, in addition to the traditional parameters, receives a new resource for its understanding. Potential increase of heritage sites number, leads to improvement in the subjective perception of living space. At the same time, the value valorization of modern urban formations requires a change in the basic attitudes in mass culture, that have existed in it since the postmodern times. The strategy of facilitating this process is an important task of future theoretical research as in architectural (city planning), as in cultural, social, media etc.

It had been analyzed a process of reducing the chronological distance between the appearance of a building and its listing as the heritage; the gradual acceptance as a heritage of objects of modernist architecture. Also it had been identified the phenomenon of juxtaposition of "historical" and "modern" types of project outlook in mass culture, which often becomes confrontational, in which modern architecture acted as a kind of negative antithesis to the positive hierotopy of the past. The problem of the absence in the national theory of architecture, the strategy of positive conceptualization of modernist heritage at the level of mass culture is outlined

  1. Boito, C.; Birignani, C. 2009, Restoration in architecture: First dialogue. Future Anterior, 6, p. -22
  2. Frank G. 1993, The Conservation of Immovable Cultural Property: Ethical and Practical Dilemmas, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 15-21.
  3. Glendinning M. 2013, The Conservation Movement: A History of Architectural Preservation, London: Routledge.
  4. Jokilehto, J. 1986. A History of Architectural Conservation: The Contribution Of English, French, German And Italian Thought Towards An International Approach To The Conservation Of Cultural Property D.Phil. Thesis, The University Of York, Institute of advanced Architectural Studies, England.
  5. Jokilehto, J. 2008, The idea of conservation: An overview. In Conservation and Preservation: Interactions between Theory and Practice: In Memoriam Alois Riegl (1858-1905): Proceedings of the International Conference of the ICOMOS International Scientific Committee for the Theory and the Philosophy of Conservation; Polistampa: Vienna, Austria, - p. 1000-1015.
  6. Kuprianowicz G. 2008, Akcja burzenia cerkwi prawosławnych na Chełmszczyźnie i południowym Podlasiu, Prawosławna Diecezja Lubelsko-Chełmska, Chełm
  7. Lamprakos. M. 2014, Riegl's "modern cult of monuments" and the problem of value. Chang. Time, -р. 418-435
  8. Machado, R. 1976, Old Buildings as palimpsest. Towards a theory of remodelling, Progressive Architecture, 1976/11: p. 46-49
  9. MacDonald S. 2013. Modern Matters Breaking the Barriers to Conserving Modern Heritage, available at: ˂ ˃ [Accessed: 6.03.2020]
  10. Powell, K. 1999, Architecture reborn. Converting old buildings for new uses, New York: Rizzoliinternational publications, inc.
  11. Romanides J. S. 1981, Franks, Romans, Feudalism and Doctrine, Patriarch Athenagoras Memorial Lectures Holy Cross Orthodox Press
  12. Scott. F.2007, On Altering Architecture; Routledge: London, UK
  13. Stubbs J. H. 2011, Time Honored: A Global View of Architectural Conservation, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons
  14. Theodore H. M. 2008, Preservation of Modern Architecture, Hoboken, NJ: JohnWiley and Sons
  15. Tunbridge, J. 1984, Whose heritage to conserve? Cross-cultural reflections on political dominance and urban heritage conservation, Canadian Geographer 1984 Vol.28 No.2, - pp.170-180 ref.34
  16. Prudon T. 2017, Preservation, design and modern architecture: the challenges ahead, Journal of Architectural Conservation 23(1-2):1-9 · June 2017
  17. Vaccaro. A.1996, Restoration and anti-restoration. In Historical and Philisophical Issues in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage. The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, pp. 308-313.
  18. Wong, L. 2016, Adaptive Reuse: Extending the Lives of Buildings; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland.