The article analyzes theoretical provisions, existing legal acts that regulate relations related to the application of administrative responsibility for committing bullying or mobbing (harassment).
Abstract. Consideration of the provisions related to administrative illegality aimed at encroachment on social relations involves the analysis of its main components and causes of its occurrence in normal conditions of the functioning of society, as well as in special conditions to which the legal regime of martial law belongs. The complexity of the socio-economic and political situation in Ukraine led to the introduction of martial law by the President of Ukraine (February 2022) due to military aggression by the Russian Federation.
The Ukraine’s acquisition of the status of a "candidate state" of member states of the European Union, as well as the influence and observance of the international legislation on human rights and freedoms, significantly complements the administrative and legal status of citizens of our country. The ratification by the Ukrainian state of the European Convention on Human Rights (1997) and other international legal acts related to rights and freedoms opened a new stage in the development of national legal science, especially regarding the protection of the rights of natural persons [1, p.
This article addresses the key points and issues related to the conduct of administrative corruption cases. After all, the responsibility for and counteraction to corruption and corruption-related offenses continues to be one of the elements of the anti-corruption system. At the same time, an important component of this mechanism are the rules that establish responsibility for committing not only acts of corruption, but also different from acts of corruption, which are the background phenomena that cause corruption, and therefore counteract both legal and law enforcement levels.
The article deals with issues related to the administrative and legal protection of the cultural heritage of Ukraine in modern conditions.
Restoration of violated rights and freedoms of individuals and legal entities is closely linked to their protection and protection, through the implementation of tasks defined in Articles 1 and 9 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of Ukraine, and Article 2 of the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine, which testifies to the democratic constitutional principles of development of the legal system of Ukraine with the use of administrative and restorative measures.
The current system of liability in the field of investment activity is considered in the article. It is proved that the legal institute of liability is an obligatory element of the mechanism of legal regulation of investment relations, as it directs the actions of all subjects of investment activity to lawful behavior.
The article deals with issues related to the violation of the rules by citizens in quarantine and bringing the perpetrators to administrative responsibility. Attention is drawn to the importance of understanding, interpreting and using the terms that characterize quarantine, its constituent elements, as well as measures of sanitary and hygienic, sanitary and anti-epidemic content, aimed at combating infectious diseases.
The author examines the legal responsibility, which is inextricably linked with the need to comply with regulations, rules of conduct, submission, harmonization of their behavior with the objective laws of nature and society. If there is no need to comply with any rules, regulations, then there is no responsibility. Legal requirements are formulated in the form of legal obligations in the form of specific or general legal relations.
The article deals with theoretical aspects of typology of corruption manifestations in the police. Emphasis is placed on the existence of corruption risks affecting the effectiveness of police activities. It has been proven that preventing corruption risks is a complex process, as not all risks can be identified and assessed, many of them likely and probable. The principles of criminal, administrative and disciplinary liability of police officers for committing corruption offenses are considered.