The analyzed positions of scientists that determine the content of criminal procedure functions. Here the question was examined regarding the content, the moment of occurrence and the stages of the implementation of the criminal procedure function of the prosecution. It is emphasized that the function of the prosecution is the driving force of the criminal process and contributes to the emergence of other criminal procedural functions of the defense and the trial.
The legislation governing the participation of a lawyer in the civil process of Ukraine has been analyzed. The activity of lawyers as a legal institute, which stands for the protection of citizens' rights and reflects the state and level of democracy in the country, is elaborated. Considering how stable it is, has a clear organization, is governed by the laws and is protected depends largely on the confidence of each member of society in their well-being and in the success of their business activities.
The legal status of the court as a subject of civil procedural relations is investigated. The main issues of judicial jurisdiction in civil cases, the specific characteristics of civil jurisdiction, the delimitation of procedural institutions of jurisdiction and jurisdiction are analyzed. The author analyzes the main problems of subject and subjective jurisdiction of civil cases in the context of the amendments to the civil procedural legislation.
In the article, based on the analysis of the content of the duties specified by the law for
probation bodies, the problem issues concerning the execution of a sentence in the form of
deprivation of the right to occupy certain positions or to engage in appropriate activities
regarding those convicted of crimes in the sphere of pensions and social security of Ukraine, as
well as Proposed scientifically substantiated measures on their solution in essence.
The article analyzes the legislative consolidation of the representation function of the procurator of the interests of a citizen or state in a court in the countries of the CIS and the European Union. The changes in the grounds and procedure for the execution by the prosecutor of representative activities in accordance with the Law of Ukraine “On Prosecutor's Office” of October 14, 2014 are considered.
The article is devoted to theoretical and practical problems of people’s participation in implementation of justice in Ukraine.
The development of a jury in Ukraine as a form of popular participation in the administration of justice in the context of continental (European) and Anglo-Saxon legal systems.
The article reveals the branching of administrative jurisdiction of the judiciary. It defines the dependence of the court jurisdiction division on their specialization. The article determines features, analyses criteria and provides examples that characterize and
differentiate the administrative jurisdiction of the court system in Ukraine.
The article analyzes the stages of proceedings on military administrative violations in the preparatory phase considering of the requirements of current legislation and administrative practices of the judiciary (judges), authorized to consider the cases.
In the article the principle elements of a fair trial. Particular attention is focused on the element of independence and impartiality of the judiciary. Indicated that the principle of independence as regards the justice system or the status of judges in the country, their
interaction with other bodies. Principle provides unbiased focus on the particular case.
The article deals with the right to fair trial Particular attention is focused on the
elements of the right. Investigated access to court as permanently significant component of the
right to a fair trial. Determine the relevance availability litigation