EVALUATION OF COMPONENTS UNCERTAINTY IN COMPOSITE MATERIAL WEAR RESISTANCE

1
Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies, Ukraine
2
Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies, Ukraine

Accurately estimating measurement uncertainty is crucial for reliable and meaningful results in material abrasive wear resistance testing. In general, the process of assessing uncertainty involves several steps, including identifying sources of uncertainty, determining correlations between input quantities, and calculating various types of uncertainties. Knowing the measurement uncertainty allows for: ensuring compliance with established standards, monitoring and improving the accuracy and reliability of the testing process. The components of the measurement uncertainty of abrasive wear resistance are studied in detail in the paper. It is revealed that indirect factors can have a predominant effect on the total uncertainty of the method.The methodology for assessing uncertainty should be described in regulatory documents to ensure consistency and comparability across different testing laboratories. By incorporating uncertainty assessment into abrasive wear resistance testing, researchers and engineers can improve the quality and reliability of their results, leading to better decision-making in materials selection and process optimization.

  1. I.Farrance, R.Frenkel,“Uncertainty of Measurement: A Review of the Rules for Calculating Uncertainty Components through Functional Relationships”, Clin Biochem Rev., vol. 33, 2012, p. 49-75.
  2. G.H.White,“Basics       of       estimating        measurement uncertainty”, Clin Biochem Rev., vol. 29, 2008, p. 53–60.
  3. A. Deacon,Calculations in Laboratory Science. London: ACB Venture Publications, 2009.
  4. L.Kirkup, B. Frenkel,An Introduction to Uncertainty in Measurement. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  5. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM) JCGM 100:2008. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_200 8_E.pdf
  6. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology Evaluation of measurement data – An introduction to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” and related documents. JCGM104:2009. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/docu ments/jcgm/JCGM_104_2009_E.pdf
  7. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainly in Measurement. Switerland: ISO, 1993. 101 p.
  8. N. F.Zhang,“Calculation of the uncertainty of the mean of autocorrelated measurements”,Metrologia, vol. 43, 2006, 76–81.
  9. J. R. Taylor, “An Introduction to Error Analysis, the study of uncertainties in physical measurements”. California: University Science Books, 1997.
  10. ISO 6344-1:1998 Coated abrasives. Grain size analysis. Part 1: Grain size distribution test. Switzerland: ISO, 1998.
  11. Available:https://uk.qiantongutmtester.com/
  12. CEN EN 12096-1997 Mechanical vibration - Declaration and verification of vibration emission values, 1997.
  13. OIML D 28:2004 Conventional value of the result of weighing in air, 2004.