Purpose. Investigation of daily movement of GNSS station BRGN of GeoTerrace reference network of Institute of geodesy Lviv Polytechnic National University, by the results of GNSS and linear-angular measurements in order to exclude such movements of geodynamic observations. Methodology. At first step reference network have been created. It included 2 pillars of Beregany geodetic base line (P1, P2). For determination of precise coordinates of these pillars, static GNSS observations were done with use of double frequency receivers. After finalizing of session of GNSS observations, precise robotic total station Leica TCRP1201 was installed on the point P1. In parallel, temperature and pressure measurements were conducted, and atmospheric corrections were determined on the processing stage. Processing of linear-angular (baseline P1–BRGN) and satellite measurements (P2–BRGN) was done in specialized software Leica Geo Office. After data processing comparison and analysis of the results of daily station movement of BRGN reference station have been done, two methods were used for this purpose. Results. Methodic of daily movement of GNSS station is proposed with joint usage of linear-angular and satellite measurements. By the results of permanent linear-angular measurements by the duration of 25 hours are determined that station BRGN is moving within 3 mm in horizontal plane. During the dark and daytime movement is going to the different directions. Results of satellite observations are correlated with the results of linear-angular measurements. However, dispersion of satellite measurements is much higher. This confirms that short-term station movement is very complicated to be determined using only satellite observations, and this kind of measurement can be used only as control measurements. High dispersion may be caused, by the satellite observations distortion due to different factors. Is determined that Sun azimuth has influence to the direction of BRGN pillar movement. Movement is going to opposite direction from the direction to the Sun. It caused by the temperature difference on the lighted and unlighted, by the Sun, parts of pillar. Obviously it leads to the deflection of the pillar aside to the less heated part of pillar, because metal during the heating is expanding. Originality. By the results of investigation, the methods of daily reference station movement determination is developed and approved. One promising avenue for further research might identify patterns of daily reference station movement in different seasons and develop techniques to exclude the results of geodynamic observations. Practical significance. The developed methods of daily reference station movement determination can be used for investigation and prognoses of daily GNSS stations movements of geodynamic polygons.
1. Vysotenko R. Vyznachennja shvydkostej zminy koordynat postijno dijuchykh stancij i periodychno dijuchykh punktiv UPM GhNSS za rezuljtatamy suputnykovykh gheodezychnykh sposterezhenj 1995–2007 rokiv [Determining the rate of velocities of permanent stations, and periodically existing settlements UPN GNSS based on satellite geodetic measurements 1995–2007 period]. Modern achievements in geodetic science and industry [Suchasni dosjaghnennja gheodezychnoji nauky ta vyrobnyctva]. 2010, No. 19, pp. 80-86.
2. Navodych M. Stancija BRGN [GNSS Station BRGN]. GeoTerrace, 2016. Available at: URL: satnet.lp.edu.ua/station-brgn/ (Accessed 09 Januar 2016)
3. Savchuk S. G. Praktychni aspekty zastosuvannja novoi' referencnoi' systemy USK2000 [Practical aspects of implementing a new reference system USK2000]. Javoriv. Mizhnarodna naukovo-tehnichna konferencija GEOFORUM [International Scientific Conference GEOFORUM], 2012, No. 17.
4. Trevoho I. S. The problems of geodetic network construction in a city and methods to solve them. Dis. Doc.: 05.24.01, Lviv, 1999, 250 p.
5. Trevoho I. S. Vliyanie vneshney sredy na ustoychivost punktov gorodskoy geodezicheskoy seti [The impact of the environment on the stability of the city points of geodetic network]. Geodesy and Cartography, 1990, Vol. 5, pp. 22–26.
6. Asensio E., Khazaradze G., Echeverria A., King R. W. and I. Vilajosana., GPS studies of active deformation in the Pyrenees. Geophysical Journal International, 2012, Vol. 190, issue 2, pp. 913–921.
7. Brockmann E., Ineichen D., Mahler P. GNSS and Tachymetry for Monitoring the stability of Pemanent Reference Station. Bundesamt fur Landestopografie Swisstopo, 2013.
8. Brunner F. K. Bridge Monitoring: external and internal sensing issues. Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructure, 2006, pp. 693–698.
9. Devoti R., Pietrantonio G., Riguzzi F. GNSS networks for geodynamics in Italy. Física de la Tierra, 2014, Vol. 26, pp. 11–24.
10. Gerhatova L., Hefty J., Papco J., Minarikova M. Displacements of GNSS Antenna Position due to Thermal Bending of Pillar Monument. Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 2015.
11. Georgiev I., Dimitrov D., Pashova L. Geodetic monitoring of the recent crustal movements in Southwestern Bulgaria, Geosciens, 2006, pp. 354–357.
12. Grgić I., Malović I., Kapović Z. Experimental Measurements on the Business Tower ''Zagrepčanka'', INGEO 5th International Conference on Engineering Surveying, 2011, No. 5, pp. 195–204.
13. Haas R., Bergstrand S., Lehner W. Evaluation of GNSS Monument Stability. Reference Frames for Applications in Geosciences, 2013, pp. 45–50. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-32998-2_8.
14. Kowalczyk K., Rapiński Ja. New elaboration of gradient map of vertical crustal movements in the territory of Poland. Technical sciences Abbrev.: Techn. Sc, 2011, No. 14(2), pp. 245–254.
15. Kowalczyk K. New model of the vertical crustal movements in the area of Poland. Geodesy and Cartography, 2006, issue 4, pp. 83–87. doi: 10.1080/13921541. 2006.9636702.
16. Leica Geosystems AG. TPS 1200. Leica Geosystems AG. – Heerbrugg: Copyright Leica Geosystems AG, 2005, pp. 180 – (User manual). – (Version 1.0).
17. Lidberg M., Lilje M. Evaluation of Monument Stability in the SWEPOS GNSS Network using Terrestrial Geodetic Methods-up to 2003. Gävle: LANTMÄTERIET, 2007. pp. 42 – (Reports in Geodesy and Geographical Information Systems).
18. Saracoglu E., Gustafsson A., Fjellstrom P. Short-term monitoring of a cable-stayed timber footbridge. International Conference on Timber Bridges, 2013, pp. 1–10.
19. Schlunegger F., Hinderer M. Crustal uplift in the Alps: why the drainage pattern matters. Terra Nova, 2001, pp. 425–432.
20. Sibylle G., Hans-Ulrich W. Contributions to the Deformation Analysis in Germany Based on Precise and Continuous GPS Measurements. Natural Hazards, 2006, Vol. 38, issue 1–2, pp. 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-005-8612-6
21. Teferle F. N., Bingley R. M., Orliac E. J., Williams S. D. P., Woodworth P. L., McLaughlin D., Baker T. F., Shennan I., Milne G. A., Bradley S. L. and Hansen D. N. Crustal motions in Great Britain: evidence from continuous GPS, absolute gravity and Holocene sea level data. Geophysical Journal International, 2009, issue 1, pp. 23–46.
22. Wieser A., Brunner F. Analysis of Bridge Deformations using Continuous GPS Measurements. INGEO 2nd Conference of Engineering Surveying, 2002, No. 2, pp. 45–52.
23. Zhao S, Lambeck K, Lidberg M. Lithosphere thickness and mantle viscosity inverted from GPS-derived deformation rates in Fennoscandia. Geophysical Journal International, 2012, Vol. 190, issue 1, pp. 278–292.