Establishment of the automated system of geodetic monitoring for structures of Tereble-Ritska HPP

1
Department of Higher Geodesy and Astronomy of Lviv Polytechnic National University
2
Engineering geodesy department of Lviv Polytechnic National University
3
Lviv Polytechnic National University
4
Lviv Polytechnic National University
5
Department of Higher Geodesy and Astronomy of Lviv Polytechnic National University

The article presents the aspects of historical development of monitoring of Tereble-Ritska hydroelectric power station (HPP), which led to the need of establishing an automated system of geodetic monitoring (ASGM) of deformations of the water pipeline and other structures. Since 2018, the system has been automated and the instrumental part continues to be expanded. Thus, as of 2022, the instrumental part of ASGM includes 3 main components, namely: linear-angular measurements with the determination of meteorological parameters, satellite GNSS measurements, and piezometric measurements. This article presents the results of ASGM work in order to monitor deformations. There are also some advantages of using ASGM in comparison with classical measurements, which first of all allow determining of coordinates in real-time and increase the accuracy of spatial deformation detection to 2 mm (horizontal) and 3 mm (height) on an area of 2 km2. It is also possible to inform the maintenance services of the monitored object when the received deformation exceeds the established limits. According to the results of the time series of linear-angular measurements, it can be stated that the pipeline undergoes seasonal displacements which are manifested in the horizontal displacement of supports towards the HPP building from winter to summer, and vice versa from summer to winter. To date, the amount of special data for the aggregate analysis of linear-angular measurements with the determination of meteorological parameters, GNSS measurements and piezometric measurements is insufficient. As data accumulates, it will be important to establish relationships between these parameters.

  1. Barzaghi, R., Cazzaniga, N. E., De Gaetani, C. I., Pinto, L., & Tornatore, V. (2018). Estimating and comparing dam deformation using classical and GNSS techniques. Sensors18(3), 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030756
  2. Bisovetskyi, Yu., Tretyak, K., & Shchuchik, E. (2011) Automation of geodetic observations of hydraulic structures of Ukrhydroenergo hydroelectric power plants. Hydropower of Ukraine, 2, 45-51. (In Russian)
  3. Behr, J. A., Hudnut, K. W., & King, N. E. (1998, September). Monitoring structural deformation at Pacoima dam, California using continuous GPS. In Proceedings of the 11th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 1998) (pp. 59-68). https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=2934
  4. Demedyuk, M., Sidorov, I., & Tretyak, K. (1993). Influence of the Rika tectonic fault on the deformation of the Tereblya-Rikska HPP pressure pipeline. Geodesy, Cartography and Aerial Photography, 55, 14-22. (In Ukrainian). https://science.lpnu.ua/istcgcap/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-55-1993/i...
  5. Farenyuk, G., Vaynberg, O., & Shuminskyi, V. (2020). Reliability and safety of hydraulic structures of the Dnieper and Dniester cascades of HPP. Science and Construction, 25(3), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.33644/scienceandconstruction.v25i3.1 (In Ukrainian)
  6. Grytsyuk, T. (2010). Geodetic monitoring of short-period displacements of pressure pipelines of hydropower facilities (on the example of Tereble-Ritska HPP). Ph.D-thesis. Lviv Polythechnic University. (In Ukrainian)
  7. Kulchytskyi A. (2009). Structural and geological features of the territory of Tereble-Ritskaya HPP and assessment of their impact on the deformation of the derivation pipeline by geological and geodetic methods. Modern Achievements in Geodetic Science and Industry, 18, 44-48 (In Ukrainian). http://vlp.com.ua/files/11_69.pdf
  8. Mogilny, S., Sholomitsky, A., Shmorgun, E., & Prigarov, V. (2010) Automated system of geodetic monitoring. Modern Achievements in Geodetic Science and Industry, 19, 193–197. (In Russian). https://vlp.com.ua/taxonomy/term/3164?page=1
  9. Munekane, H, Tobita, M., Takashima, K. (2004) Groundwater-induced vertical movements observed in Tsukuba, Japan. Geophys Res Lett., 31(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020158
  10. Nazarevych, A., Nazarevych, L., & Shlapinskyy, V. (2016). Seismicity, geology, seismotectonics and geodynamics of Tereblya-Ritska HPP’s area (Ukrainian Transcarpathians). Geodynamics, 20, 170-192. (In Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2016.01.170
  11. Savchyn, I., & Pronyshyn R. (2020) Differentiation of recent local geodynamic and seismic processes of technogenic-loaded territories based on the example of Dnister Hydro Power Complex (Ukraine). Geodesy and Geodynamics11(5), 391-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2020.06.001
  12. Savchyn, I., & Vaskovets, S. (2018). Local geodynamics of the territory of Dniester pumped storage power plant. Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia, 15(1), 41-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.13168/AGG.2018.0002
  13. Sokoła-Szewioła, V., & Siejka, Z. (2021). Validation of the accuracy of geodetic automated measurement system based on GNSS platform for continuous monitoring of surface movements in post-mining areas. Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics, 112(1), 47-57. https://sciendo.com/it/article/10.2478/rgg-2021-0007
  14. Tretyak, K., & Palianytsia B. (2021). Research of seasonal deformations of the Dnipro HPP dam according to GNSS measurements. Geodynamics, 1(30), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2021.01.005
  15. Tretyak, K., Brusak, І., Bubniak, І., & Zablotskyi, F. (2021b). Impact of non-tidal atmospheric loading on civil engineering structures. Geodynamics, 2(31), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2021.02.016
  16. Tretyak, K., Grytsyuk, T., Dvulit, P., & Babiy, L. (2010). Application of geodetic methods for monitoring of stresses of penstock on Tereblya-Rikska hydropower station. Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich, (11), 135-149. https://agro.icm.edu.pl/agro/element/bwmeta1.element.dl-catalog-3d582503...
  17. Tretyak, K., Korliatovych, T., Brusak I., & Smirnova O. (2021a). Differentiation of kinematics of the Dnister HPP-1 dam (based on the data of GNSS monitoring of spatial displacements) Modern Achievements in Geodetic Science and Industry, 42, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.33841/1819-1339-2-42-57-66 (In Ukrainian)
  18. Tretyak, K., Kylchitskiy, A., & Sidorov, I. (2009). Geodynamics of Tereblja-Riksky technogenic range. Geodynamics, 1(8), 47-52 https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2009.01.047 (In Ukrainian)
  19. Tretyak, K., Petrov, S., Golubinka, Yu., Al-Alusi, F. (2014). Analysis of points stability of automated geodetic monitoring of engineering structures of Kaniv HPP. Geodesy, Cartography and Aerial Photography, 80, 5-19. (In Ukrainian). https://science.lpnu.ua/istcgcap/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-80-2014/a...
  20. Tretyak, K., Savchyn, I., Zayats, O., Golubinka, Yu., Lompas, O., & Bisovetskyi Yu. (2017). Installation and maintenance of automated systems for control of spatial displacements of engineering structures of Ukrainian hydropower plants. Hydropower of Ukraine, (1-2), 33-41. (In Ukrainian). https://uhe.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2018-08/8.pdf
  21. Zayats, O. S., Tretyak, K. R., Smirnova, O. M., & Tserklevych, A. L. (2021, November). Development and implementation of automated system of geodetic monitoring on Tereble-Ritska HPP for structural control of engineering constructions. In 15th International Conference Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment (Vol. 2021, No. 1, pp. 1-5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20215K2089