адміністративна відповідальність

The article analyses the practice of courts considering cases of bringing persons to administrative
liability for committing domestic violence. As social conditions change, so do the forms of violent acts and
the preconditions for their commission, as well as the practice of courts considering such cases. Domestic
violence is behaviour in which physical and psychological coercion is used to establish and maintain
control over a loved one, with whom the perpetrator is usually connected by common life or family ties.

The article characterizes the peculiarities of the functioning of judicial bodies as subjects of the system of administrative and legal guarantee of the activity of religious organizations in Ukraine. Implementation by judicial bodies of administrative and legal guarantees of the activities of religious organizations is carried out by the system of courts of general jurisdiction, administrative courts, and the Supreme Court of Ukraine, acting on the same basis, regarding the implementation of joint tasks in the sphere of justice.

Abstract. The article is devoted to a comprehensive study of technologies designed to protect intellectual property rights. The scientific basis for the study of information technologies for ensuring the protection of intellectual property rights is analyzed.

The article analyzes theoretical provisions, existing legal acts that regulate relations related to the application of administrative responsibility for committing bullying or mobbing (harassment).

In particular, it was found out that a broad list of violent acts, which manifest themselves in the form of bullying and mobbing (harassment), is enshrined in Articles 173-4, 173-5 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses. Among various manifestations of violence, the aggressive behavior of a person who commits violent acts against another person is noted.

Abstract. Consideration of the provisions related to administrative illegality aimed at encroachment on social relations involves the analysis of its main components and causes of its occurrence in normal conditions of the functioning of society, as well as in special conditions to which the legal regime of martial law belongs. The complexity of the socio-economic and political situation in Ukraine led to the introduction of martial law by the President of Ukraine (February 2022) due to military aggression by the Russian Federation.

The Ukraine’s acquisition of the status of a "candidate state" of member states of the European Union, as well as the influence and observance of the international legislation on human rights and freedoms, significantly complements the administrative and legal status of citizens of our country. The ratification by the Ukrainian state of the European Convention on Human Rights (1997) and other international legal acts related to rights and freedoms opened a new stage in the development of national legal science, especially regarding the protection of the rights of natural persons [1, p.

This article addresses the key points and issues related to the conduct of administrative corruption cases. After all, the responsibility for and counteraction to corruption and corruption-related offenses continues to be one of the elements of the anti-corruption system. At the same time, an important component of this mechanism are the rules that establish responsibility for committing not only acts of corruption, but also different from acts of corruption, which are the background phenomena that cause corruption, and therefore counteract both legal and law enforcement levels.

The article deals with issues related to the administrative and legal protection of the cultural heritage of Ukraine in modern conditions.

Restoration of violated rights and freedoms of individuals and legal entities is closely linked to their protection and protection, through the implementation of tasks defined in Articles 1 and 9 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of Ukraine, and Article 2 of the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine, which testifies to the democratic constitutional principles of development of the legal system of Ukraine with the use of administrative and restorative measures.

The current system of liability in the field of investment activity is considered in the article. It is proved that the legal institute of liability is an obligatory element of the mechanism of legal regulation of investment relations, as it directs the actions of all subjects of investment activity to lawful behavior.