Antinomic Implementation оf Natural Law

Each person plans something, designs and tries to implement this program into practical life
activities. Of course, not everything planned becomes real, and sometimes things are implemented that
were not thoroughly thought about. In the philosophy of law, of particular interest is the completeness
and quality of the implementation of natural laws, on the basis of which a person forms natural law for
himself according to his intelligible and sensitive endowments. Then comes realization as the
implementation of the project of one’s actions and behavior, necessary for the acquisition of spiritual
paradigms and material needs. There is a difference between the implementation of natural law and the
implementation of positive law.
In the first case, a natural-supernatural source unfolds, and in the second, the will of the
legislator. Both are mandatory. Only the natural-supernatural source is guided by its own narratives, and
the will of the legislator – by state narratives. Both narratives are not immune to antinomies. Therefore,
antinomic realization is directed in two directions – natural law and positive law. Of greater interest is
the first direction, which is original.
Antinomic implementation of natural law means that there are conflicting or opposing
interpretations of the observance, implementation, use or application of natural law in different contexts
or among different groups of people. This may arise due to differences in how exactly to understand and
implement natural law in different situations.
First, let’s make it clear: how can and is there a need to implement antinomic norms? Is such
scientific thought ontological? We believe that there are three main life positions of the antinomic
realization of natural law as one’s intellectual evaluations, about the possibility of acting in a certain way,
not seeing evil (non-ontological) intentions in this.