Modern concepts on understanding the phenomenon of civil society

2020;
: 31-38

Harasymiv T. "Modern concepts on understanding the phenomenon of civil society"
http://science.lpnu.ua/law/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-7-number-428-20...

Authors:
1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Institute of Jurisprudence and Psychology

The article analyzes modern concepts of understanding the phenomenon of "civil society" on the basis of a significant array of source base, both domestic and foreign. In particular, an attempt was made to systematize and classify research approaches to understanding the content, patterns of formation and development of civil society in modern world and Ukrainian scientific discourse. Thus, we can distinguish at least seven relatively independent research approaches and many more attempts to synergistically combine different of them in certain authorial combinations. Independent approaches should include, first of all, formal-legal, institutional, globalization, spatial-value, communication, activity and case studies. The proposed classification of research approaches to understanding the phenomenon of civil society in modern scientific discourse makes it possible to focus within a certain approach on certain institutional, procedural, value, activity, communication, etc. characteristics and features of civil society to further synergistic elaboration. regarding its development.

1. Lucas E. Freedom ragged march. Megachange: The World in 2050. Edited by Daniel Franklin & John Andrews. New Jersey : John Wiley & Sons, 2012. pr.126 - 149. 2. Anheier H. Civil Society: «Measurement, Evaluation, Policy». London: Taylor & Francis, 2013. 226 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849770736 3. Pukhkal O. H. Poshuk pryrodnoho shliakhu rozvytku hromadianskoho suspilstva imperatyv novitnoi ukrainskoi derzhavy. [Search for a natural way of development of civil society is an imperative of the modern Ukrainian state].Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia. 2012. Vyp. 4. P. 40-46. 4. Tretiak S. M. Kontseptualni zasady reformuvannia ukrainskoho hromadianskoho suspilstva. [Conceptual principles of reforming Ukrainian civil society. Bulletin of the Academy of Advocacy of Ukraine]. Visnyk Akademii advokatury Ukrainy. 2009. Vyp. 2. P. 20-26. 5. Lotiuk O. S. Konstytutsiino-pravovyi mekhanizm formuvannia ta pidtrymky instytutiv hromadianskoho suspilstva. [Constitutional and legal mechanism of formation and support of civil society institutions]. Publichne pravo. 2013. № 2. P. 37-42. 6. Blystiv T. Klasyfikatsiia pidkhodiv do rozuminnia kontseptu hromadianskoho suspilstva v suchasnomu naukovomu dyskursi.[Classification of approaches to understanding the concept of civil society in modern scientific discourse]. Publichne upravlinnia: teoriia ta praktyka. 2014. Vyp. 1. P. 199-205. 7. Bublii M. P. Osnovni kharakterystyky vzaiemodii hromadianskoho suspilstva ta derzhavy. [The main characteristics of the interaction of civil society and the state]. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia. 2013. № 2. P. 129-137. 8. Novoskoltseva L. O. Demokratiia v hromadianskomu suspilstvi: analiz modeli instytutiv derzhavy. [Democracy in civil society: an analysis of the model of state institutions ]. Politolohichni zapysky. 2013. № 7. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/Polzap_2013_7_11.pdf (data zvernennia: 01.09. 2020). 9. Soliar S. P. Instytuty hromadianskoho suspilstva. [Institutes of civil society]. Forum prava. 2013. № 1. P. 933-938. 10. Barmatova S. P. Hromadianske suspilstvo v Ukraini: tendentsii ta zahrozy. [Civil society in Ukraine: trends and threats]. Rynok pratsi ta zainiatist naselennia. 2012. № 1. P. 27-29. 11. Vladymyrov M. V. Derzhavna vlada v umovakh rozvytku hromadianskoho suspilstva. [State power in the development of civil society].Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia. 2013. №2. P. 46-53. 12. Trebin M. P. Suchasnyi stan hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini: problemy i perspektyvy. [The current state of civil society in Ukraine: problems and prospects].Ukrainskyi sotsium. 2013. № 4. P. 161-174. https://doi.org/10.15407/socium2013.04.161 13. Tryma K. A. Transformatsiini chynnyky ukrainskoho hromadianskoho suspilstva.[ Transformational factors of Ukrainian civil society] Visnyk Mariupolskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Ser. : Istoriia. Politolohiia. 2012. Vyp. 3. P. 91-100. 14. Honiukova L., Horban Yu. Vplyv hromadsko-politychnykh rukhiv na rozvytok hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini.[ The influence of socio-political movements on the development of civil society in Ukraine] Hileia: naukovyi visnyk. 2013. № 75. P. 508-510. 15. Kosinov S. A. Kontrol nad publichnoiu vladoiu yak funktsiia hromadianskoho suspilstva. [Control over public power as a function of civil society]. Yuryst Ukrainy. 2013. № 4. P. 5-10. 16. Karmazina O. O. Vzaiemodiia orhaniv publichnoho upravlinnia z hromadskistiu v konteksti rozvytku hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini. [Interaction of public administration bodies with the public in the context of civil society development in Ukraine]. Derzhavne upravlinnia: teoriia ta praktyka. 2013. № 1. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/Dutp_2013_1_30.pdf (data zvernennia: 01.09. 2020). 17. Mikhnenko A., Mesiuk M. Vladni instytuty ta hromadianske suspilstvo: dialoh chy manipuliatsiia suspilnoiu svidomistiu? [Power institutions and civil society: dialogue or manipulation of public consciousness?]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii derzhavnoho upravlinnia pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy. 2009. Vyp. 2. P. 5-12. 18. Rokytska O. Yu. Orhanizuiuche znachennia derzhavnoi vlady dlia formuvannia hromadianskoho suspilstva [Organizing importance of state power for the formation of civil society Scientific works of the Black Sea State University named after Petro Mohyla]. Naukovi pratsi Chornomorskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Petra Mohyly. Ser.: Sotsiolohiia. 2012. T. 177. Vyp. 165. P. 76-82. 19. Doroshenko V. Deiaki peredumovy ta aspekty formuvannia hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukrainskii derzhavi. [Some prerequisites and aspects of the formation of civil society in the Ukrainian state]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii derzhavnoho upravlinnia pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy. 2012. Vyp. 3. P. 221-226. 20. Hetman Ye. A., Mernyk A. M. Suchasni teoretyko-pravovi kontseptsii hromadianskoho suspilstva. [Modern theoretical and legal concepts of civil society.]. Yuryst Ukrainy. 2011. № 3(16). P. 5-9. 21. Cavatorta F. Civil Society Activism Under Authoritarian Rule: A Comparative Perspective [ECPR studies in European political science]. New York, Routledge, 2013. 274 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203094549 22. Glasius M. Exploring Civil Society: Political and Cultural Contexts. Edited by Marlies Glasius, David Lewis, Hakan Seckinelgin - New York, Routledge, 2014. 224 p. 23. Markets and civil society: the European experience in comparative perspective. Edited by Victor Perez-Diaz. New York Oxford : Berghahn Books, 2014. 278 p. 24. Rozumnyi M. M. «Hromadianske suspilstvo» VS «politychna natsiia».["Civil Society" VS "political nation"]. Stratehichni priorytety. 2013. № 2. P. 5-11.