Philosophy of formation of lawyer's competences

: 111-115
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Institute of Jurisprudence and Psychology

There is a gap in the process of discussing the reform of higher education in the legal field, which has not yet been identified as significant by experts. The point is that the communicative component of the legal profession has become completely despised in the educational process, and later in practice. This is due to the leveling of branch communication and jurisprudential science, which are practically absent in the domestic humanities: neither the languages of modern law nor legal linguistics are properly developed by researchers. In this regard, the level of legal communication of law graduates is on average quite low. Even the analysis of linguistic and stylistic literacy of lawyers does not show a proper level of knowledge, even on a medium scale. The proof is the acquaintance with the business documentation of judges, prosecutors, lawyers and investigators, which record numerous violations of speech norms - linguistic, morphological, syntactic, stylistic, spelling, which affects the quality of communication. It is not necessary to prove the connection of these normative phenomena with the content of the legal document and the logic of the statement. In this regard, a number of important questions arise regarding the need to make changes to the training program for lawyers, giving priority to legal communicative competence.

1. Alimov VV Legal translation: a practical course. English language. Ed. 3, stereotyped. 2005. 160 p. 2. Muschinina M. M. On legal linguistics in Germany and Austria. URL: 3. Khvorostyankina A. Definitions in legislative texts: questions in theory. URL: 4. Verbenets M. B. Legal terminology of the Ukrainian language: history of formation and functioning: author's ref. dis. for science. degree of Cand. philol. Science: special. 10.02.01; Kiev. nat. Univ. T. Shevchenko, Inst. Of Philology. K., 2004. 20 p. 5. Lytvyn V. Possibilities of forensic linguistic examination. Law of Ukraine. 2001. № 1. 6. Lytvyn TV Forensic linguistic examination of oral reports. Bulletin of the Lviv Institute of Internal Affairs. 2001. № 1. S. 268–272. 7. Matveeva O. N. On the question of legalization of the conflict text. Jurislinguistics-5: Legal aspects of language and linguistic aspects of law. URL: 8. Poludyonny M. The right to express evaluative judgments through the prism of reputation protection. Legal journal. 2003. № 10. URL: 9. Great-grandfather Y. F. The place of linguistic examination in the system of forensic examinations // In the field of linguistics and law. Simferopol: Elinho, 2006. S. 194–199. 10. Tokarska A. S. Legal communication in the context of postclassical legal understanding: dis. … dr. Jurid. Science: Wed. 12.00.12 «philosophy of Law». K., 2008. 362 p. 11. Shamraev A. V. Legal regulation of information technology (problem analysis and basic documents). Version 1.0. M.: «Statute», «Intertech», «BDC-press», 2003. 1013 p. 12. Shahbazyan K. International cooperation of citizens in the field of legal regulation of the Internet. Ukrainian Journal of International Law. 2003. № 1. S. 70–73. 13. Shvachko S. O., Kobyakova I. K. Superficial and deep structure of legal texts // Law and linguistics: materials of the International scientific-practical conference: In 2 parts (September 18–21, 2003). Simferopol: DOLIA, 2003. Part 2. P. 49–54. 14. Sheinov V. P. Conflicts in our lives and their resolution. Minsk, 1996. 288 p. 15. Shinkarenko I. O. Peculiarities of social-perceptual regulation of professional communication of a police officer: author's ref. dis. for science. degree of Cand. psychol. Science: special. 19.00.06 / Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs. Kharkiv, 2005. 20 p. 16. Yurchuk O. F. Verbal communication in the perspective of linguistic criminology // Law and Linguistics: Proceedings of the II International. scientific-practical Conf.: in 2 hours (September 22–26, 2004). Simferopol: FATE, 2004. Part 1. 17.серп. 2020.

Tokarska A. "Philosophy of formation of lawyer's competences"