The article analyzes the structuring of the legal system as a regulatory framework of the legal system, which is formed based on the legal ideology of a state and at the same time acting as a normative basis for behavior in the field of law. The generative role of legal consciousness in relation to the component structure of the legal system is determined, which in the future ensures its integration. In the context of recent developments in legal doctrine, it is rational to analyze the mental and psychological perception of the distribution of law in the field and the criteria for their separation, which determines the relevance of this scientific article. The criteria of industry formation are the features and properties, the presence of which allows us to conclude that a certain legal entity (institution, subsector, etc.) has achieved in its development the status of a separate independent branch in the legal system. The crystallization of branches of law absolutely occurs in the plane of legal doctrine, but it is important to understand that it is also due to a significant number of non-legal determinants, which are transformed into the legal level through legal awareness. Despite a fairly comprehensive analysis of the structuring of the legal system in the domestic legal doctrine, at the present stage there is a clear need to rethink certain paradigms of jurisprudence, which is seen in changing the emphasis of generally accepted criteria for the division of law in the industry.
1. Averyn AV Pravoponymanye y konkretyzatsyia zakonodatelstva.[ Understanding and specification of legislation]. Konkretyzatsyia zakonodatelstva kak tekhnyko-yurydycheskyi pryem normotvorcheskoi, ynterpretatsyonnoi, pravoprymenytelnoi praktyky. N. Novhorod: Nyzhehorodskaia akademyia MVD Rossyy, 2008. 1134 p. 2. Dudnik R. M. Do problemy vyokremlennia systemoutvoriuiuchykh chynnykiv, shcho vplyvaiut na protses formuvannia novykh haluzei ukrainskoho prava. [On the problem of isolating system-forming factors influencing the process of formation of new branches of Ukrainian law].Pravo i suspilstvo. 2015. № 4. P. 8–12. 3. Holovyna AA K voprosu o poniatyy kryteryev otrasleobrazovanyia v systeme rossyiskoho prava, ykh teoretycheskom y praktycheskom znachenyy.[On the question of the concept of criteria for industry formation in the system of Russian law, their theoretical and practical significance]. Law and Hosudarstvo: Theory and Practice. 2011. № 6. P.50–52. 4. Belыkh VS Poniatye bankovskoho prava y eho mesto v systeme prava Rossyy.[The concept of banking law and its place in the legal system of Russia] Hosudarstvo y pravo. 2011. № 4. P.5–13. 5. Dudnik R. M. Oznaky haluzei ukrainskoho prava. [Signs of branches of Ukrainian law] Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. 2015. Issue. 2. T. 1. P. 29–32. 6. Strohovych MS Uholovno-protsessualnoe pravo v systeme sovetskoho prava. [Criminal procedure law in the system of Soviet law.].Sovetskoe hosudarstvo y pravo. 1957. № 4. P.55–66. 7. Alekseev SS O teoretycheskykh osobennostiakh klassyfykatsyy otraslei sovetskoho prava.[ On the theoretical features of the classification of branches of Soviet law]. Sovetskoe hosudarstvo y pravo. 1957. № 7. P.31–38. 8. Babenko AN Aksyolohycheskye prychynы pravotvorcheskykh oshybok. [Axiological causes of law-making errors].Pravotvorcheskye oshybky: poniatye, vydы, praktyka tekhnyka ustranenyia v postsovetskykh hosudarstvakh: materyalы Mezhd. scientific practice round table (May 29-30, 2008). M .: Prospekt, 2009. P. 304–326. 9. Zamorska LI Vidnosno vyznacheni normy prava: poniattia, struktura, funktsii [Relatively defined rules of law: concept, structure, functions]: avtoref. dys. ... cand. yuryd nauk: spets. 12.00.01 «Teoriia ta istoriia derzhavy i prava istoriia politychnykh i pravovykh uchen. Odessa, 2009. 24 p. 10. Varych O. H. Ekonomichni funktsii suchasnoi derzhavy: pryroda, zmist, tendentsii rozvytku v Ukraini [Economic functions of the modern state: nature, content, development trends in Ukraine]: avtoref. dys. ... cand. yuryd nauk: cpets. 12.00.01 "Teoriia ta istoriia derzhavy i prava istoriia politychnykh i pravovykh uchen"; Instytut derzhavy i prava im. VM Koretskoho. Kyiv, 2006. 22 p. 11. Haneev R. R. O sushchnosty hradostroytelnoho prava y eho sviaziakh s hrazhdanskym pravom. [On the essence of urban law and its links with civil law]. Evrazyiskyi yurydycheskyi zhurnal. 2010. № 2 (21). P.11–19. 12. Vasylev VV Funktsyy hrazhdanskoho prava kak systemoobrazuiushchyi faktor otrasly.[ Functions of civil law as a system-forming factor in the industry]. Law and economy: theory and practice. 2011. № 6. P.23–29. 13. Chelyshev M. Yu. O kompleksnыkh pravovыkh otrasliakh. [On complex legal industries].Problems of law. 2007. № 15. P.11–17. 14. Asadov A. M., T. V. Drakhenberh On the question of the teleological criterion of the differential system of Russian law.[ Drachenberg On the question of the teleological criterion for the differentiation of the system of Russian law]. Problems of law. 2012. № 2. P.23–29.