Identification of natural and technogenic seismic events by energy characteristics

https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2023.02.099
Received: October 15, 2023
1
Main Center for Special Control NSMC SSA of Ukraine
2
Main Center for Special Control NSMC SSA of Ukraine
3
Main Center for Special Control NSMC SSA of Ukraine

One of the key problems of seismic monitoring is the identification of earthquakes and signals from technogenic sources detected by a network of seismic stations. In peacetime, technogenic events are mainly associated with industrial mining developments, however, with the beginning of russia's full-scale aggression against sovereign Ukraine, thousands of seismic signals from explosions as a result of missile, aircraft, artillery strikes were registered by the seismological network of the Main Center of Special Monitoring of the State Space Agency of Ukraine. This significantly complicates the process of assessing seismicity and makes the question of determining the nature of registered events extremely relevant. Based on the analysis of seismic signals, the relationships between energy classes (K), magnitudes (mb), maximum amplitudes of longitudinal volumetric phases , and yields (Y) of explosions in TNT equivalent in Kyiv, Zhytomyr, Vinnytsia, Khmelnytsky, Chernihiv regions. Energy characteristics can be used to identify the nature of seismic events, and the results of the analysis of the ratios , ,   make it possible to yield estimate of explosions in TNT equivalent and determine the probable types of ammunition based on the received data. The energy from the signal source in the case of an explosive event can be determined additionally by infrasound data, the presence of an acoustic wave serves as an additional criterion for identifying the event. At the same time, energy characteristics make it possible to identify natural sources, an example of which is the tectonic earthquake of May 26, 2023 in the Poltava region.One of the key problems of seismic monitoring is the identification of earthquakes and signals from technogenic sources detected by a network of seismic stations. In peacetime, technogenic events are mainly associated with industrial mining developments, however, with the beginning of russia's full-scale aggression against sovereign Ukraine, thousands of seismic signals from explosions as a result of missile, aircraft, artillery strikes were registered by the seismological network of the Main Center of Special Monitoring of the State Space Agency of Ukraine. This significantly complicates the process of assessing seismicity and makes the question of determining the nature of registered events extremely relevant. Based on the analysis of seismic signals, the relationships between energy classes (K), magnitudes (mb), maximum amplitudes of longitudinal volumetric phases , and yields (Y) of explosions in TNT equivalent in Kyiv, Zhytomyr, Vinnytsia, Khmelnytsky, Chernihiv regions. Energy characteristics can be used to identify the nature of seismic events, and the results of the analysis of the ratios , ,   make it possible to yield estimate of explosions in TNT equivalent and determine the probable types of ammunition based on the received data. The energy from the signal source in the case of an explosive event can be determined additionally by infrasound data, the presence of an acoustic wave serves as an additional criterion for identifying the event. At the same time, energy characteristics make it possible to identify natural sources, an example of which is the tectonic earthquake of May 26, 2023 in the Poltava region.

  1. Anderson, J., & Wood, O. (1925). Description and theory of the tor:sion seismometer. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 15, 1–72.
  2. Andrushchenko, Yu. A., & Gordienko, Yu. O. (2009). Analysis of the effectiveness of the application of criteria for the identification of explosions and earthquakes for local and regional events in the conditions of the platform part of Ukraine. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal. 31, 3, 121-129. http://www.igph.kiev.ua/ukr/journal.html#
  3. Andrushchenko, Yu. A.,  & Gordienko, Yu. O. (2009). The method of identifying the nature of seismic sources based on the spectral-temporal analysis of oscillations. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal. 31, 6,  140–146. http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/12491
  4. Andrushchenko, Yu. A., Osadchiy, V. I., Lyashchuk, O. I., Kovtun, O. M.  (2018). Dependence of magnitude estimates on the power of chemical explosions at industrial quarries within the Ukrainian Shield // Geophys. Jornal, 40,  3, 157-164 https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v40i3.2018.137196
  5. Andruschenko, Y., Liaschuk, O., Farfuliak, L., Amashukeli, T., Haniiev, O., Osadchyi, V., Petrenko, K., & Verbytskyi, S. (2023). National seismological bulletin of Ukraine for 2021. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 44(6), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.24028/gj.v44i6.273649
  6. Bratt, S. R., & Nagy, W. (1991). The LocSAT Program. Science Applications International Corporation, San Diego.
  7. Cansi, Y. (1995). An automated seismic event processing for detection andlocation: the P.M.C.C. method. Geo­phys. Res. Lett., 22, 1021–1024. https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00468
  8. Dando, B.D.E., Goertz-Allmann, B.P., Brissaud, Q. Köhler A., Schweitzer J., Kværna T., Liashchuk (2023). Identifying attacks in the Russia-Ukraine conflict using seismic array data. Nature 621, 767-772 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06416-7
  9. Golden, Paul, Petru Negraru, and Jesse Howard. (1998). "Infrasound studies for yield estimation of HE explosions." Technical Rept. AFRL‐RV‐PS‐TR‐2012‐0084 (2012). https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA564065
  10. Haskell, N. A. (1967). Analytic approximation for the elastic radiation from a contained underground explosion. Journal of Geophysical Research, 72(10), 2583-2587. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ072i010p02583
  11. Hutton, L. K., & Boore D. M. (1987). The ML scale in Southern California . Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 77,  6, 2074-2094. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0770062074
  12. Khalturin, V. I., Rautian, T. G., & Richards, P. G. (1998). The seismic signal stregth of chemical explosions. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 88(6), 1511 -1524. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0880061511
  13. Kim, K., & Pasyanos, M. E. (2022). Yield estimation of the August 2020 beirut explosion by using physics‐based propagation simulations of regional infrasound. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(23), e2022GL101118. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL101118 .
  14. Kedrov, O. K. (2005). Seismic methods of monitoring nuclear tests. Institute of Earth Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences,  P. 41.
  15. Komashko, O. V. (2004). Applied econometrics. Teacher manual. K.: KNU,  55 p.
  16. Kutas, V. V., Andrushchenko, Yu. A., Omelchenko, V. D., Lyashchuk, A. I., & Kalytova  I. I. (2015). Earthquakes in the Dnipro-Donetsk avlakogen. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 37,  5. 114–127. https://journals.uran.ua/geofizicheskiy/article/view/111156/106023. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v37i5.2015.111156
  17. Lyashchuk O. I. (2015). Use of infrasound measurement data in Ukraine to identify explosions and earthquakes. Geodynamics. 1(18), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2015.01.036
  18. Lyashchuk, O. I., Andrushchenko, Yu. A., Gordienko, Yu. O., Karyagin, E. V., & Kornienko, I. V. (2015). The possibility of using infrasound monitoring data during the identification of the nature of seismic events. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 37, 6, 105-114.
  19. Mărmureanu, A., Ionescu, C., Grecu, B., Toma-Danila, D., Tiganescu, A., Dragomir, C.S., Toader, V.E., Craifaleanu, I.G., Neagoe, C., Mei, V., Liashchuk, O., & Dimitrova, L. (2021). From National to Transnational Seismic Monitoring Products and Services in the Republic of Bulgaria, Republic of Moldova, Romania, and Ukraine. Seismological Research Letters, 3(92), 1703-2021. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200393
  20. Pilger, C., Gaebler, P., Hupe, P., Kalia, A. C., Schneider, F. M., Steinberg, A., ... & Ceranna, L. (2021). Yield estimation of the 2020 Beirut explosion using open access waveform and remote sensing data. Scientific reports, 11(1), 14144. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v37i6.2015.111177 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93690-y
  21. Rautian, T. G. About determining the energy of earthquakes at distances of 3000 km.  Proceedings of the Institute of Social Sciences of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. 32 (199), 72-98.
  22. ReVelle, D. O. (1997). Historical detection of atmospheric impacts by large bolides using acoustic-gravity waves. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 822, 284-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48347.x
  23. Richter, C. (1958). Elementary Seismology. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, Calf.,. 578 р.
  24. Rodionov, V. N., Adushkin, V. V., Kostyuchenko, V. N. etc. (1971). Mechanical effect of an underground explosion. M.: Nadra. 224 p.
  25. Seismic Network Main Center of Special Monitoring. (2010). International Federation of Digital Seismograph etworks. https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/UD.
  26. Shagov, Yu. V. (1976).  Explosives and gunpowder. M., Voenizdat, 120 p.
  27. Sharov, N. V., Malovichko, A. A., & Shchukin, Yu. K. (2007). Earthquakes and microseismicity in the problems of modern geodynamics of the Eastern European platform. Book 2: Microseismicity. Petrozavodsk: Karelian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences,  P. 19.
  28. Vasylchenko, O. V., Kvitkovskyi ,Yu. V., & Stelmakh, O. A. (2015). Building structures and their behavior in emergency situations. Kharkiv: Khnadu,  485 p.
  29. Vergoz, J., Hupe, P., Listowski, C., Le Pichon, A., Garcés, M. A., Marchetti, E., ... & Mialle, P. (2022). IMS observations of infrasound and acoustic-gravity waves produced by the January 2022 volcanic eruption of Hunga, Tonga: A global analysis. Earth and Planetary Science Letters591, 117639.