Purpose: The financialization of the economy is pivotal in contemporary economic development, facilitating investment attraction, resource allocation efficiency, and innovation stimulation. However, it can also lead to financial instability and income inequality, necessitating careful regulation. Financialization ensures access to financial resources essential for economic growth. Effective management of this process requires the application of relevant tactical tools of economic development, which can be generalized into external environmental influence factors. Given the relevance of numerous external and internal drivers in economic activity and management practice, the formation of tactical innovative tools for economic development demands thorough research and modeling within the context of financialization.
Design/methodology/approach: To achieve the article's objectives, economic and mathematical modeling was conducted using a multifactor regression model, with national income as the dependent variable. The independent variables were selected based on components such as economic policy activities, project activity, investments in educational and scientific activities, foreign trade, and the social sphere. The modeling process utilizes data from the European Commission, aggregated across EU countries. The number of observations is restricted to the statistical summaries available for the EU-27 countries.
Findings: The regression parameters were estimated using the least squares method. The model’s quality was evaluated using criteria such as R-square (0.985) and adjusted R-square (0.980). The absence of multicollinearity among the independent variables was confirmed (Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) test), and the Durbin-Watson (2.025) test was employed to assess the autocorrelation of residuals. The results of the Durbin-Watson test indicate the absence of autocorrelation among the independent variables. At a significance level of a = 0.05, and with tabulated parametric values ( dv = 0.98; du = 1.89 ), calculated using degrees of freedom V1, V2, no autocorrelation was detected. To determine the model’s suitability for forecasting purposes, its adequacy was thoroughly assessed (Fisher’s Exact Test).
Originality/value: The modeling results revealed a close relationship between the level of financialization and the studied indicators, ranked by decreasing influence as follows: x1 (gross accumulation of fixed capital);x6 (income distribution inequality); x5 (state budget allocations or expenditures on research and development); x2 (investments by institutional sectors); x3 (investments in environmental protection); x4 (total expenditures on education). Conversely, x7 (foreign trade balance) negatively impacts financialization. The model was evaluated based on quality, adequacy, and multicollinearity indicators. The developed model is suitable for forecasting the level of financialization, with the obtained levels of influence of independent variables on target indicators being crucial for strategic planning and tactical management within enterprises.
Practical implications: The model can be utilized by government bodies for forecasting financialization levels in Ukraine and EU countries, aiding in strategic planning and tactical management at micro, meso, and macro levels.
1. Kyrychenko A. H., Yermolenko L. V. (2015). Finansializatsiia vitchyznianoi ekonomiky: formy proiavu ta naslidky [Financialization of the domestic economy: forms of manifestation and consequences]. Global and national problems of the economics, Vol. 6, 717–719 (in Ukrainian).
2. Hryshchenko T. V., Anzina H. V. (2019). Osnovni napriamy vplyvu finansializatsii na funktsionuvannia natsionalnykh ekonomik i subiektiv hospodariuvannia [The main areas of influence of financialization on the functioning of national economies and business entities]. Business Inform, 1 (492), 296–302 (in Ukrainian).
3. Trofymchuk O. A. (2014). Finansializatsiia ekonomiky: prychyny ta naslidky [Financialization of the economy: causes and consequences]. Efektyvna ekonomika [Efficient economy], No.4.Retrieved from: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/ index.php/Downloads/pdf/9_2019/Економічний%20вісник%20 Національного%20технічного%20університету%20України%20?op=1&z=2928 (in Ukrainian).
4. Kornieiev M. V. (2014). Teoretyko-metodychni zasady otsiniuvannia rivnia finansializatsii ekonomiky [Theoretical and methodological principles of assessing the level of financialization of the economy]. The problems of economy, No. 3, 19–24 (in Ukrainian).
5. Kruhlyk S., Yeremenko O. (2012). Valovyi natsionalnyi dokhid krain svitu [Gross national income of the world]. Visnyk of the National Bank of Ukraine [Bulletin of the National Bank of Ukraine], 3, 3–5. Retrieved from:https://journal. bank. gov.ua/archive/2012/3.pdf#page=3 (in Ukrainian).
6. Rudevska V. I. (2021). Evoliutsiia teorii ekonomichnoho zrostannia ta chynnyky yoho otsiniuvannia [Evolution of theories of economic growth and factors of its assessment]. Problems and prospects of economics and management, No. 2(22), 18–30. Retrieved from: http://ppeu.stu.cn.ua/article/view/219125 (in Ukrainian).
7. Sidelnykova L. P. (2014). Kontseptualni osnovy formuvannia biudzhetnykh resursiv derzhavy [Conceptual foundations of the formation of state budget resources]. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University, Series “Economics”, 2, 118–123 (in Ukrainian).
8. Zhuk I. I. (2019). Transformatsiia fiskalnoi polityky ta yii vplyv na ekonomichnyi potentsial derzhavy [Transformation of fiscal policy and its impact on the economic potential of the state]. Business Inform, 1 (492), 317–322. (in Ukrainian).
9. Zinchenko M. A. (2014). Ekonomichna pryroda finansovykh potokiv mistsevykh biudzhetiv [The economic nature of financial flows of local budgets]. Ekonomika ta derzhava [Economy and the state], 10, 100–103 (in Ukrainian).
10. Skrypchuk P. M., Shpak H. M. (2015). Sotsialnyi mekhanizm rozvytku orhanichnoho vyrobnytstva v Ukraini [Social mechanism for the development of organic production in Ukraine]. Orhanichne vyrobnytstvo i prodovolcha bezpeka: zb. materialiv dop. uchasn. III Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. Zhytomyr: Polissia, 35–39 (in Ukrainian).
11. Olifirenko, L., Koval K. (2019). Udoskonalennia metodychnykh pidkhodiv otsiniuvannia efektyvnosti sotsialnoi dopomohy u konteksti polityky podolannia bidnosti ta nerivnykh mozhlyvostei naselennia Ukrainy [Improving methodological approaches to assessing the effectiveness of social assistance in the context of the policy of overcoming poverty and unequal opportunities of the population of Ukraine]. Herald of Economics, 3, 98–110.DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/visnyk 2019.03.098 (in Ukrainian).
12. Myronova М., Myronov Y., Svatiuk D. (2018). Econometric modeling of ukraine’s national income based on multiple regression. Social and Legal Studios, Vol. 1, No. 1, 107–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2018-1-107-113 (in English).
13. Panzhar M. I. (2012). Instrumentarii vyznachennia efektyvnosti natsionalnoi ekonomiky Ukrainy ta perspektyvy yii pidvyshchennia [Toolkit for determining the efficiency of the national economy of Ukraine and the prospects for its improvement]. Zovnishnia torhivlia: ekonomika, finansy, pravo [Foreign trade: economics, finance, law], 2, 147-152 (in Ukrainian).
14. Khomenko I. O. Volynets L. M., Chubykina A. O. (2020). Stratehichni zasady investuvannia v liudskyi kapital dlia zabezpechennia rozvytku natsionalnoi ekonomiky Ukrainy [Strategic principles of investing in human capital to ensure the development of the national economy of Ukraine]. Problems and prospects of economics and management, 1 (21), 38–45. DOI: 10.25140/2411-5215-2020-1(21)-38-45 (in Ukrainian).
15. Verkhohliadova N., Kasianovskyi Ye. (2018). Metodychnyi pidkhid do upravlinnia investytsiiamy v realnyi sektor na osnovi indykatyvnoho otsiniuvannia [Methodological approach to investment management in the real sector based on indicative assessment]. The Economic Discourse, 1, 42–50. (in Ukrainian).
16. Shpotenko V. D. (2017). VVP ta VNP yak makroekonomichni pokaznyky vplyvu na zrostannia dobrobutu naselennia [GDP and GNP as macroeconomic indicators of influence on the growth of the population's well-being]. Ekonomika ta derzhava [Economy and the state], 8, 84–88. (in Ukrainian).
17. Investment share of GDP by institutional sectors. Eurostat. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_08_11/default/table?l... (in English).
18. Environmental protection investments of total economy. Eurostat. Retrieved from:https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ten00136/default/table?la... (in English).
19. Glossary: Government budget appropriations or outlays for research and development (GBAORD).Eurostat. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Gloss... budget_ appropriations_or_outlays_for_research_and_development_(GBAORD) (in English).
20. Inequality of income distribution S80/S20 income quintile share ratio - EU-SILC and ECHP surveys. Eurostat. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ilc_pns4/default/table?la... (in English).
21. International trade, by reporting country, total product. Eurostat. Retrieved from:https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tet00002/default/table?la... (in English).
22. Rahman N. A. (1968). A Course in Theoretical Statistics, Charles Griffin and Company. (in English).