1. SMEU
  2. All Volumes and Issues
  3. Volume 6, Number 2, 2024
  4. Conceptual Basics of International Innovation Policy Formation

Conceptual Basics of International Innovation Policy Formation

SMEU.
2024;
Volume 6, Number 2
: pp. 309 - 322
Authors:
  1. M. Odrekhivskyі
  2. U. Kohut
  3. M.O. Bahlai
1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Department of Management and International Business
2
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Department of Management and International Business
3
Lviv Polytechnic National University Department of Management and International Business

Globalization and integration processes specify the objectivity of coordinating actions in the implementation of certain international processes, joining efforts in solving the problems facing humanity, ensuring economic growth on an intensive basis. In such conditions, the main role in the formation of effective business processes and the production of competitive products is played by the development and implementation of innovations. The formation of innovative potential and the development of international innovative activity directly depend on the successfully developed policy of the states to promote the development and spread of innovations. Joining the efforts of countries, especially those integrated in the field of innovation, plays a particularly important role in solving modern problems of an international scale, caused by the challenges of Industry 5.0, focused on environmental, social and economic factors of managerial influence on international innovation processes. That is, the study of approaches to the formation of international innovation policy meets the requirements of the time, is relevant and necessary.

The purpose of the article is to study approaches to the formation of international innovation policy and to develop proposals for improving the strategic management of international innovative activity. The task of the article is to study the essence, purpose and conceptual foundations of the formation of international innovation policy at all levels of its organization.

The article defines the concept of "international innovation policy" and its role in promoting the development of international cooperation in the field of science and technology, increasing international innovative activity to ensure competitiveness and development of economic systems at various organizational levels. Conceptual basics of formation and structural components of international innovation policy are defined. A conceptual model of international innovation policy has been developed, which includes elements of global, international, national, entrepreneurial and interpersonal integration and competition. The constituent components of the corporate innovation policy were formed and a model of the sequence of formation of innovative products was developed. The relevance of the formation of an anthropological innovation policy (nanolevel) is substantiated, which will allow to study the general patterns of the relationship between man and the natural environment, the influence of socio-economic and environmental factors on the functioning of the human body, to carry out purposeful management of human health, its reproduction and restoration, and the formation of relevant innovations.

It is advisable to direct further research to the study of the problems of international innovation policy formation caused by the challenges of Industry 5.0, oriented to ESG-activity (environment, social sphere and management), that is, to the environmental, social and economic factors of managerial influence on international innovation processes.

international innovation policy
international innovation activity
globalization and glocalization
competitiveness
  1. Dovhal O.A., Dovhal G.V. (2017). Hlobalnyi innovatsiinyi prostir: peredumovy, spetsyfika y instrumenty for- muvannia [Global innovation space: prerequisites, specifics and tools of formation]. Problems of the economy, N 1, 15- 20.
  2. Diatlova V.V., Diatlova Yu.V., Fokina-Mezentseva K.V. (2023). Innovatsiinist natsionalnykh ekonomik: metodychni zasady porivniannia krain YeS ta Ukrainy [Innovativeness of national economies: methodological princi- ples of comparison of EU countries and Ukraine]. Scientific and industrial Journal "Business-navigator". Issue 1 (71), 20-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/business-navigator.71-4. Retrieved from http://www.business-naviga- tor.ks.ua/journals/2023/71_2023/6.pdf.
  3. Kadol L.V., Kravchuk L.M. (2016). Pryntsypy formuvannia innovatsiinoi polityky pidpryiemstva [Principles of formation of innovative policy of the enterprise]. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Economic Sciences Series, Issue 17. Part 1, 76-79.
  4. Kraus N.M. (2019). Innovatsiina ekonomika v hlobalizovanomu sviti: instytutsionalnyi bazys formuvannia ta traiektoriia rozvytku [Innovative economy in the globalized world: institutional basis of formation and development trajectory]. Monograph. Kyiv: Agrar Media Group.
  5. Krylov D.V. (2022). Analiz reitynhovoho otsiniuvannia rozvytku innovatsiinoi diialnosti v Ukraini [Analysis of the rating assessment of the development of innovative activity in Ukraine]. Efficient economy. N 5. DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2022.5.8. Retrieved from http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=10285.
  6. Marchenko T.V. (2021). Mizhnarodni innovatsiini prohramy yak instrument yevrointehratsii Ukrainy [Inter- national innovation programs as a tool of European integration of Ukraine]. Monograph. Chernivtsi: Chernivtsi National University.
  7. Nort D. (2000). Instytutsii, instytutsiina zmina ta funktsionuvannia ekonomiky [Institutions, institutional change and functioning of the economy]. D. Nort. Trans. from English I. Dzyuba, K.: Fundamentals.
  8. Odiahaylo B.M. (2003). Ekonomika: tranzytyvnist vid naiprostishoi do hlobalnoi [Economy: transitivity from the simplest to the global]. Kyiv National University of Economics, Kryvyi Rih University of Economics, D.: Porogy.
  9. Onikiyenko V.V. (2006). Innovatsiina polityka krain Yevrosoiuzu ta SND: problemy i praktyka realizatsii [Innovation policy of the EU and CIS countries: problems and practice of implementation]. Ukrainian Society, N 3, 170-183.
  10. Pysarenko T.V., Kuranda T.K. at all. (2023). Naukova ta naukovo-tekhnichna diialnist v Ukraini u 2022 rotsi [Scientific and scientific and technical activity in Ukraine in 2022]: scientific and analytical report. K.: UkrINTEI. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/nauka/2023/07/25/Nauk-analit.dopov.... tekhn.diyaln.v.Ukr.2022-25.07.2023.pdf.
  11. Pysarenko T.V., Kuranda T.K., Kvasha T.K. at all. (2021). Stan naukovo-innovatsiinoi diialnosti v Ukraini u 2020 rotsi [The state of scientific and innovative activity in Ukraine in 2020]: a scientific and analytical note. K.: UkrINTEI. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/nauka/2021/06/23/AZ.nauka.innovatsi... 29.06.2021.pdf.
  12. Polyakova, Yu.V. (2016). Efektyvnist rehionalnykh innovatsiinykh system [Effectiveness of regional innova- tion systems]. Economy and society, issue N 6, 272-276.
  13. Seleznova L. (2011). Innovatsiino-investytsiina diialnist v ekolohichnii sferi [Innovative investment activity in the environmental sphere]. Bulletin of Kyiv National University named after Taras Shevchenko. Economy. 124/125/2011, 76-78. Retrieved from http://bulletin-econom.univ.kiev.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/125_9.pdf.
  14. Soboleva K. (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023: Ukraina na 55-mu mistsi i v top-3 v hrupi krain iz dokhodamy nyzhche serednoho [Global Innovation Index 2023: Ukraine is in 55th place and in the top 3 in the group of countries with below-average incomes]. Mind. Retrieved from https://mind.ua/news/20263287-global-innovation- index-2023-ukrayina-na-55-mu-misci.
  15. Fedulova, L.I. (2014). Formuvannia rehionalnykh innovatsiinykh system u konteksti pryntsypiv Yevropeiskoi innovatsiinoi polityky [Formation of regional innovation systems in the context of the principles of the European inno- vation policy]. Academic Review, 1 (40), 144-155.
  16. Barata João, Kayser Ina (2023). Industry 5.0 – Past, Present, and Near Future. Procedia Computer Science, Volume 219, 778 - 788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.351.
  17. Binish Qadri, Mudaser Ahad Bhat (2018). Interface between Globalization and Technology. Asian Journal of Managerial Science (AJMS), Volume 7, N 3, 1-6.
  18. Cheney, David, Christopher, T. Hill, Patrick Windham (2021). America Needs A New International Strategy for Science, Technology, and Innovation. Issues in Science and Technology, January 28, 2021. Retrieved from https://issues.org/international-science-technology-innovation-policy/.
  19. Denzau A., North D. (1994). Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions. Kyklos:. Vol. 47, № 1, 3–31.
  20. Dosi G. (1988). “Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation”. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 26(3), 1120-1171.
  21. Harberger A. (1998). “A vision of the growth process”, American Economic Review, vol. 88 (1), 1-32.
  22. Industry 5.0. (2022). Purpose-Driven Technology Adoption for People and the Planet. Momenta: Retrieved from:        https://www.momenta.one/hubfs/Resources/Reports-andSurveys/Momenta-Industry%205.0-Report-2022.pdf.
  23. Jakob Edler, Jan Fagerberg (2017). Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Pol- icy, Volume 33, Issue 1, 2-23. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001.
  24. Johan Schot, W. Edward Steinmueller (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innova- tion and transformative change, Research Policy, Volume 47, Issue 9, 1554-1567.
  25. Kaidong Feng, Ziying Jiang (2021). State Capacity and Innovation Policy Performance: A Comparative Study on Two Types of Innovation Projects in China, Review of Policy Research (RPR), Volume 38, Issue 4, 427-453.
  26. Savchuk K. (2019). The Five Best Policies to Promote Innovation - And One Policy to Avoid. Stanford Grad- uate School of Business. Political Economy, October 07, 2019. Retrieved from  https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/in-       sights/five-best-policies-promote-innovation-one-policy-avoid.
  27. Leijten J. (2019). Innovation policy and international relations: directions for EU diplomacy. Eur J Futures Res, 7, 4.Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-019-0156-1 
  28. Marinko Skare, Domingo Riberio Soriano (2021). How globalization is changing digital technology adoption: An international perspective. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, Volume 6, Issue 4, 222-233.
  29. South Korea  Leads World in Innovation as U.S.  Exits  Top Ten. Bloomberg.  (2021).  Retrieved  from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-02-03/south-korea-leads-world-in-innovation-u-s-drops-out-of-top- 10.
  30. Valtteri Laasonen, Jari Kolehmainen, Markku Sotarauta (2020). The complexity of contemporary innovation policy  and  its  governance  in  Finland,  Innovation.  The   European   Journal   of   Social   Science   Research, DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2020.1842176.
  31. Wanzenbock Iris, Frenken Koen (2020). The subsidiarity principle in innovation policy for societal challenges.Global Transitions, № 2, 51-59.
  32. Wihalminus Sombolayuk, Ria Mardiana Yusup, Indrianty Sudirman (2019). Innovation Strategy for Creating Successful Small and Medium Businesses. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research (AEBMR), volume 92, 507-526. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2991/icame-18.2019.53.
  33. WIPO (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022: What is the future of innovation-driven growth? World Intel- lectual Property Organization. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2022/.
  34. WIPO (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023: Innovation in the face of uncertainty. World Intellectual Prop- erty Organization. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2023/.
  35. Wouter Boon, Jakob Edler. (2018). Demand, challenges, and innovation. Making sense of new trends in inno- vation policy. Science and  Public Policy, Volume 45,  Issue 4,  435–447. Retrieved  from https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy014.
  36. Zhang Y.-J., Peng Y.-L., Ma C.-Q., Shen B. (2017). Can Environmental Innovation Facilitate Carbon Emis- sions Reduction? Evidence from China, Energy Policy, 100, 18-28.