The article examines the administrative and legal status of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine (SBGSU) as a specific entity of public administration in the field of national security and state border protection. It is determined that the legal status of the SBGSU represents a complex category combining the features of a military formation and a law enforcement agency of special purpose.
The article studies the system of patronage service in Ukraine as an important part of the public service. Special attention is paid to explaining what patronage service is, its place in the civil service system, and how it connects with political and administrative structures. The article also looks at the problem of the unclear legal status of patronage officers, which has long been discussed by lawyers and in practice.
The article examines the legal status of civil servants in Ukraine and identifies the prospects for its modernization taking into account modern European standards of public administration. The essence of civil service is analyzed as a professional activity of persons who implement the tasks and functions of state bodies and local self-government bodies, ensuring the satisfaction of public needs within the legally defined legal field.
Abstract. The article examines the issue of performance evaluation civil servants in the context of improving the civil service. It is emphasized that the evaluation of civil servants is an important element in management process which ensures transparency, accountability and compliance the official duties performance with the established standards. At the same time, an effective evaluation system should take into account current challenges and trends, including digitalization, increasing demands on the quality of services, and the need to adapt to changes in society.
Formulation of the problem. Effective operation and recovery of Ukraine during the wartime and post-war periods require the implementation of new organizational structures in the public sector aimed at ensuring the provision of high-quality public services. The existing principles of organizational design have their drawbacks and advantages, and they have the property of changing under the influence of external factors. It is necessary to consider these factors when developing effective organizational structures with defined objectives.
The article is devoted to the definition of aspects of balance in the implementation of the principle of openness and transparency of the civil service institute, as well as consideration of this issue in the context of the challenges of the information society, in particular, in relation to "cyber-sovereignization".
Problem setting. Compared to other post-Soviet states, Ukraine is maximally open to globalization. Consequently, it is more and more affected by the destructive manifestations of globalization. Such openness, which fully corresponds to the structure of the Ukrainian mentality, is, on the one hand, a powerful factor in the modernization dynamics of social development, and on the other – a brake on the formation and implementation of its own nationally regulated development strategy.
The main aspects of status of public servant as legal, organizational, functional and competence are considered. The functional aspect of servant status in the context of analysis of the competence of the public authority is defined. The legal aspects of status of public servant are generalized. The competence aspect of status of public servant in the sphere of public service is revealed.
Problem setting. Ukraine is on the path of systemic institutional transformations, which consist in modernization of the civil service and human resources management, formation of a new personnel policy with the use of modern HR technologies, the implementation of which is impossible without proper legislative support.
Problem setting. The civil servant is one of the main objects of public service reform and, at the same time, its subject. This is due to the fact that civil servants, as representatives of the senior public service, are the main actors in the formation of reform policy in the field of public service, as well as, subject to regulatory legislation, catalysts for its implementation. At the same time, transformational changes affect the legal status of public servants, which in turn affects the formation of their rights and responsibilities.