expert

Abstract. The article analyzes the important aspects of conducting forensic medical examinations in the context of the investigation of criminal cases and other offenses. The author determines that according to the object of examination, forensic medical examination can be divided into the following types: forensic medical examination, forensic medical examination of living persons, forensic medical examination of material evidence.

The article is devoted to the problem of organization of forensic activity in the process of criminal prosecution and, in general, to the problem of improving the whole procedure of obtaining evidentiary information in the process of criminal proceedings in European countries. Such foreign experience can be, in particular, extremely useful both for the organization of forensic activities in Ukraine and, in general, for improving the whole procedure of obtaining evidentiary information in the course of criminal proceedings in the context of procedural coercion.

Тhe article explores the main provisions of the civil procedural legislation regarding the legal regulation of the institute of other participants in the trial. The author emphasized the relevance of the research topic in the context of reforming the judicial system as a whole and the civil process in particular. Other litigants in civil proceedings form a separate group of civil procedural entities.

The article is devoted to the problem of organization of forensic expert activity in the
process of criminal prosecution and, in general, the problem of improving the whole procedure
for obtaining evidence in the course of criminal proceedings. On the basis of the analysis of
domestic and foreign scientific literature, some issues of the organization of forensic expert
activity in some European states, as well as issues of legal (procedural) status of a judicial
expert are investigated. The conclusion is drawn about the importance of foreign experience in

On the basis of analysis of legislation, theories and practices of judicial examination are investigational maintenance of concept “оbject of examination”, a question is considered in relation to admission of collecting by the expert of objects of examination.

In wireless sensor networks (WSN) is important task of self-organization networks. There are many different algorithms for self-organization of such networks. This choice determines the relevance of pre-emptive self-algorithm network with the additional information obtained from experts. In the article features practical application of the analytic hierarchy process to select a preferred algorithm for self-organization in wireless sensor networks.

Research is sanctified to consideration of questions of the normatively-legal adjusting and features of organization and tactics of co-operation of investigator and with an expert. Considered principles and elements of co-operation, and also her stages are certain. The analysis of legislation of Ukraine in the field of forensic science activity is made in relation to co-operation of investigator with an expert.