Англо-американська та кримінологічна модель як теоретична основа англо-американської системи запобігання злочинності

2025;
: cc. 130 - 139

Цитування за ДСТУ:  Коваль М. (2025) Англо-американська та кримінологічна модель як теоретична основа англо-американської системи запобігання злочинності. Вісник Національного університету «Львівська політехніка». Серія: "Юридичні науки". Том. 12, № 2 (46), С. 130 - 139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23939/law2025.46.130

Citation APA: Koval М. (2025) Anglo-American and Criminological Model as the Theoretical Basis of the Anglo-American Crime Prevention System. Bulletin of Lviv Polytechnic National University. Series: Legal Sciences. Vol. 12, No 2 (46), pp. 130 - 139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23939/law2025.46.130

Автори:
1
Національний університет «Львівська політехніка», Навчально-науковий інститут права, психології та інноваційної освіти

In recent decades, the political, economic, social and cultural landscape against which the processes of determining and counteracting crime unfold has undergone significant changes. Globa­lization, migration, changing balance of power in the foreign policy arena, economic crises, political instability have had and continue to have a significant impact on the state of crime in the world, and also necessitate the development of new approaches to criminal policy. On the one hand, these processes affect transnational crime: criminal risks are increasingly global in nature (terrorism, environmental crime, cybercrime), serious criminal organizations are no longer localized in one state but are united in networked communities that have no borders. On the other hand, the structure and dynamics of more traditional “street” criminal offenses are changing.

In this regard, comparative criminological research is becoming increasingly important, allowing to study and learn lessons from both the positive experience of combating crime in different countries and not to repeat the mistakes made in the implementation of criminal policy, which led to negative trends in the development of crime, human rights violations, and a decrease in the level of security of citizens. First and foremost, comparative criminology aims to describe and explain various phenomena related to the determination of criminal behavior and the practice of responding to crime in different countries, but it is not limited to this. Comparative criminological research allows us to trace the significance of political, economic, and social processes – both local and global – on the development of criminal policy. This will make it possible to assess which practical solutions can be effectively applied within a completely different socio-political context and which approaches should be avoided. Comparative analysis can contribute to the development of more effective criminal policy reform programs that take into account the mistakes made in other countries from the very beginning, and avoid blind copying of those ideas that have no chance of taking root in the domestic context.

  1. Orlovska, N. O. (2013). Aktualni problemy kryminolohichnoi systemy Ukrainy. [Current Problems of the Criminological System of Ukraine].Chasopys Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia”. Seriia “Pravo”. No. 2 (8). P. 1–11. [In Ukrainian].
  2. Orlovska, N. O. (2008). Kontseptualni problemy vitchyznianoi kryminolohichnoi systemy. [Conceptual Problems of the National Criminological System].  Suchasnyi vymir derzhavy ta prava : zb. nauk. prats /za red. V. I. Terentieva, O. V. Kozachenka. Mykolaiv: Vyd-vo “Ilion”. P. 108–110. [In Ukrainian].
  3. Babenko,  A. M. (2017). Aktualni problemy vyvchennia heohrafii zlochynnosti: deiaki pytannia teorii ta praktyky. [Actual problems of studying the geography of crime: some issues of theory and practice] Naukovyi visnyk Sivershchyny. Seriia: Pravo. No. 2 (2). P. 179–187. [In Ukrainian].
  4. Lande, D. V., Furashev, V. M. (2021). Informatsiine ta sotsialno-pravove modeliuvannia [Information and socio-legal modeling]: posibnyk /za zah. red. D. V. Lande. Kyiv-Odesa : Feniks. 276 p. [In Ukrainian].
  5. Shyhun, M. M.  (2007). Modeliuvannia yak metod naukovykh doslidzhen ta inshi metody piznannia diisnosti. [Modeling as a method of scientific research and other methods of cognition of reality]. Mizhnarodnyi zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Vyp.  3 (9). P. 203–214.
  6.   Bjørgo, T. (2016). Preventing crime: a holistic approach. Springer.  [In Ukrainian].
  7. Barranco, R. E. (2016). What journals are the most cited journals in criminology and criminal justice’s “big three” journals?  Journal of Criminal Justice Education. Vol. 27. No. 1.  P. 19–34.  [In Ukrainian].
  8. Cohn, E. G., Farrington, D. P., Iratzoqui, A.  (2017). Changes in the most-cited scholars and works over 25 years: The evolution of the field of criminology and criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 25–51.  [In Ukrainian].
  9. Cohn, E. G., Farrington, D. P. (1998). Changes in the most-cited scholars in major international journals between 1986–90 and 1991–95. The British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 38. No. 1. P. 156–170.  [In Ukrainian].
  10. Percy, S.,  Loader, I. (2012). Bringing the ‘outside’ in and the ‘inside’ out: crossing the criminology/IR divide. Global Crime. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 213–218.  [In Ukrainian].
  11. Bigo, D. (2016). Rethinking security at the crossroad of international relations and criminology. British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 56. No.  6. P. 1068–1086.  [In Ukrainian].
  12. Percy, S., Loader, I. (2012). Bringing the ‘outside’ in and the ‘inside’ out: crossing the criminology/IR divide. Global Crime. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 213–218.  [In Ukrainian].
  13. Barberet, R. (2007). The Internationalization of Criminology? A Content Analysis of Presentations at American Society of Criminology Conferences. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. Vol. 18. P. 406–427.  [In Ukrainian].
  14. Aas, K. F. (2012). ‘The Earth is one but the world is not’: Criminological theory and its geopolitical divisions. Theoretical Criminology. Vol. 16. P. 5–20.  [In Ukrainian].
  15. Agozino, B. (2004). Imperialism, crime and criminology. Crime, Law and Social Change. Vol. 41, P. 343–358.  [In Ukrainian].
  16. Cain, M. (2000). Orientalism, occidentalism and the sociology of crime. British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 40. P. 239–260.  [In Ukrainian].
  17. Wallerstein, I. M. (2004). World-systems analysis: An introduction. Duke University Press.  [In Ukrainian].
  18. Reuveny, R. X., Thompson, W. R. (2007). The North-South divide and international studies: A symposium. International Studies Review. Vol. 9(4). P. 556–564.  [In Ukrainian].
  19. Carrington, K., Hogg, R., Sozzo, M. (2005). Southern criminology. British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 56. P. 1–20.  [In Ukrainian].
  20. Medina, J. (2011). Doing criminology in the ‘semi-periphery’ and the ‘periphery’ in search of a post colonial criminology. Smith, C., Zhan, S. and Barberet, R. (Eds.). Routledge Handbook of International Criminology. Oxon: Routledge. P. 13–24.  [In Ukrainian].
  21. Simester, A. P., Du Bois-Pedain, A., Neuman, U. (2014). Liberal Criminal Theory. Essays for Andreas Von Hirsch. Portland: Hart. [In Ukrainian].
  22. Ashwort, A., Zedner, L. (2014). Punishment paradigms and the role of the preventive state. Simes-
    ter, A. P., Du Bois-Pedain, A., Neuman, U. Liberal Criminal Theory. Essays for Andreas von Hirsch. Hart: Portland. P. 9–11. [In Ukrainian].
  23. Roberts, P. (2014). The limits of liberalism. Simester. A. P., Du Bois-Pedain. A., Neuman. U. Liberal Criminal Theory. Essays for Andreas von Hirsch. Hart: Portland. P. 350.  [In Ukrainian].
  24. DeKeseredy, W. S. (2009). Canadian crime control in the new millennium: the influence of neo-conservative US policies and practices. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal. Vol. 10. No.  4. P. 305–316.  [In Ukrainian].
  25. Marat, E. (2018). Mimicking ‘broken windows’ policing in post-soviet cities: expanding social control in uncertain times. Policing and Society. Online First. P. 1–17.  [In Ukrainian].