Influence of geological structures on the nature of riverbed displacements for the rivers of the Dnister basin upper part
Received: September 05, 2019
Revised: November 04, 2019
Accepted: December 05, 2019
Lviv Polytechnic National University
Lviv Polytechnic National University
Lviv Polytechnic National University
Lviv Polytechnic National University
Lviv Polytechnic National University

Aim of work is to investigate the influence of the Precarpathian bend and the Volynian-Podolian upland for the nature of displacement of the Dnister River tributaries and to determine stability of river channels. The object of this research is the Dnister River and its left and right tributaries. Considering the main factors influencing the nature of the horizontal riverbed displacements caused by both natural and anthropogenic factors, special attention is focused on the geological structures in the area on which Dnister River and its tributaries flow. Methods. Applying the software package ArcGIS authors had implemented the monitoring for a 100 year period using various topographical, geological, ground maps, and space images. For monitoring of displacements of the riverbeds of right and left bank tributaries of the Dnister there were used: topographic maps at scales 1:100000 and 1:75000 (Austrian period – 1886, 1910, Polish period –1930, the Soviet period – 1985, 1989); space images Landsat 7 (2000), Landsat 8 (2014) and Sentinel 2 (2016, 2017); and soil map scale 1:200000. It allows declaration about the different nature of the displacements. Results. The Dnister River flows on the border of two structures - the Precarpathian bend and the Volynian-Podolian upland. The right bank tributaries (Bystrytsia, Limnytsia, Stryi, and others) that begin in the Carpathians, cross the outer and inner boundaries of the Precarpathian bend, and are characterized by riverbed stability in the mountainous part, with multithreading and considerable meandering (especially for the Stryi River) within the Precarpathian bend. Lithological deposits have a significant influence at the mouth of the Stryi River. For these tributaries, according to the results of the study, large horizontal displacements are observed, they extend for: Limnytsia river – 500 m, Bystrytsia river – 580 m, Stryi River – 1200 m. The left bank tributaries, which are located on the Volynian-Podolian upland, include Zolota Lypa, Seret, Zbruch, Smotrych, and Strypa rivers. They are highly sinuos but much more stable in horizontal displacements. The maximum displacements for these rivers are 300-380 m. Scientific novelty. Investigation includes the influence of geological structures on the displacements of the left and right bank tributaries of the Dnister River and an analysis of the basic mathematical expressions that are used to evaluate the stability of the riverbeds. The practical significance. The results of monitoring riverbed deformation processes have to be considered while solving tasks related to riverbed processes, namely for: development and building of hydraulic engineering facilities, design of power transmission network when crossing rivers, development of gas transmission pipelines, determination of flood hazard zones and consequences of destruction after flash floods or seasonal floods, establishment of boundaries of land conservation areas, management of recreation activities, monitoring of the condition of frontier lands, and establishment of the border along the midstream of rivers.

1. Bayrak, H. (2016). Changes in the small-riverbeds in the context of the changes in the forestness of their pools (for example, Pidbuz River of the Starosambir district). Problems of geomorphology and paleogeography of the Ukrainian Carpathians and adjacent territories, 1, 18-31.
2. Buffington, J., Woodsmith, R., Booth, D. & Montgomery, D. (2003). Fluvial Processes in Puget Sound Rivers and the Pacific Northwest. In Restoration of Puget Sound Rivers, 46-78.
3. Burshtynska, Kh., Malanii, O., & Shevchuk, V. (2010). Monitoring of deformation flows of the rivers channels. Suchasni dosiahnennia heodezychnoi nauky ta vyrobnytstva: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Zakhidnoho heodezychnoho tovarystva UTHK, I (19), 216-226 (in Ukrainian).
4. Burshtynska, Kh., Halochkin, M., Tretyak S. & Zayac I. (2017). Monitoring of the riverbed of river Dnister of the Сarpathian Region using GIS technologies. Archiwum Fotogrametrii, Kartografii i Teledetekcji, 29, 25-36. doi:10.14681/afkit.2017.002.
5. Burshtynska, Kh., Shevchuk, V., Babushka, A., Tretyak, S. & Halochkin, M. (2018, September). Research of the morphology of river Dnister using remote sensing and cartographic data. 25th Anniversary Conference Geographic Information Systems Conference and Exhibition "GIS ODYSSEY 2018". Conference proceedings, 64-72.
6. Burshtynska, Kh., Shevchuk, V., Tretyak, S. & Vekliuk, V. (2016). Monitoring of the riverbeds of rivers Dnister and Tisza of the Carpathian region. XXIII ISPRS Congress, Commission VII (Volume XLI-B7), 177-182. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B7-177-2016
7. Chalov, R. & Makkaveev, N. (1986). Channel processes. M.: MHU, 264 s.
8. Friend, P. & Sinha, R. (1993). Braiding and meandering parameters. Geological Society London. Special Publications, 75(1), 105-111.
9. Guneralp, I. (2011). Channel avulsion processes on the lower Brazos river, Texas/Guneralp I., Billy U. Hales, Anthony M. Filippi. TWDB Final Report, 904830968, 88.
10. Heeren, D. M., Mittelstet, A. R., Fox, G. A., Storm, D. E., Al-Madhhachi, A. T., Midgley, T. L., ... & Tejral, R. D. (2012). Using rapid geomorphic assessments to assess streambank stability in Oklahoma Ozark streams. Transactions of the ASABE, 55(3), 957-968.
11. Horishnyi, P. (2014). Horizontal deformations of the lower course of the river Stryi River in 1896-2006]. Problems of geomorphology and paleogeography of the Ukrainian Carpathians and adjacent territories, 68-74. Retrieved from
12. Janicke, S. (2000). Stream channel processes. Fluvial Geomorphology. Water & Rivers Commission Report, 6, 1-12.
13. Krylenko, Y., Dzahanyia, E. & Krylenko, V. (2005). Estimation of the stability of the rocks of mountain rivers]. Ekotekhnolohyia, 22s. Retrieved from
14. Krzemień, K. (2006). Badania struktury I dynamiki koryt rzek Karpackich. Infrastruktura i ekologia terenow wiejskich, 4/1, 131-142.
15. Legg, N. & Olson, P. (2014). Channel Migration Processes and Patterns in Western Washington: A Synthesis for Floodplain Management and Restoration. Ecology Publication, 36 p. Retrieved from
16. Obodovskyi, O. (2001). Hydrological and ecological assessment of river processes (on the example of the rivers of Ukraine), Nika-Tsentr, 274 s. (in Ukrainian).
17. Obodovskyi, O., Onyshchuk, V., Yaroshevych, O. (2005). Analysis of channel processes and recommendations for managing the floodplain complex in the foothill plain section of the Tisza River. Hidrolohiia, hidrokhimiia i hidroekolohiia. Nauk. Zbirnyk, Tom 7, 69-88 (in Ukrainian).
18. Pirmez, C., & Flood, R. D. (1995). In R. D. Flood, D. J. W. Piper, A. Klaus, & L. C. Peterson (Eds.), Morphology and structure of Amazon channel (Vol. 155) (pp. 23-45). Proceedings of the ODP, scientific results, College Station, TX: Ocean Drilling Program.
19. Rudko, H., & Petryshyn, V. (2014). Characteristics of deposits of boulder-gravel-sandy rocks in the Lviv region and their impact on the ecological state of the environment. Mineralni resursy Ukrainy, 2014. 1, 39-47 (in Ukrainian).
20. Shevchuk, V. & Burshtynska, Kh. (2011). Method of monitoring the rivers in urban areas. Heodeziia, kartohrafiia i aerofotoznimannia, 75, 73-82 (in Ukrainian).
21. Simon, A., & Klimetz, L. (2008). Magnitude, Frequency, and Duration Relations for Suspended Sediment in Stable ("Reference") Southeastern Streams 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 44(5), 1270-1283.
22. Żelaziński, J. (2014). Identyfikacja i opis zmian morfologii koryta Wisły wywołanych obwałowaniem i regulacją wraz z oceną ich wpływu na ryzyko powodziowe. Załącznik 1. Projekt: Rewitalizacja, ochrona bioróżnorodności i wykorzystanie walorów starorzeczy Wisły, zatrzymanie degradacji doliny górnej Wisły jako korytarza ekologicznego, 26p.