European Court of Human Rights

Annotation. The article examines problematic issues related to the use of preventive measures in the form of detention in criminal cases and the experience of foreign countries in this area. The practice of the European Court of Human Rights regarding detention and its decisions are analyzed in the context of legal norms and standards related to human rights.

The article analyses the place and role of international institutions in the process of transitional justice. It is determined that the concept of transitional justice is a system of mechanisms and tools implemented in a country that is in a state of transition from armed conflict to post-conflict period or from totalitarian to democratic regime.

This article examines organizational and legal regulations of the relations between the Government Agent of Ukraine before the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights. The main stages of these relations are distinguished and the analysis of the activities of the Government Agent before the European Court of Human Rights is made. The problems of regulating relations between the Government Agent of Ukraine and the European Court of Human Rights are defined and the ways of their solution are suggested.

The article attempts to move from purely theoretical research on the role of judicial practice in Ukraine to more practical aspects of this issue. It is stated that, taking into account the provisions of procedural codes, legal conclusions of the Supreme Court, it is inevitable to live in the center of respect for scientists (it should be noted that legal practitioners began to study this area earlier and intensify it for scientists).

In this article, I research merely on the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding citizenship, its acquisition, and termination (Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. The United Kingdom (1985), Riener v. Bulgaria (2006), Genovese v. Malta (2012), Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxemburg (2007), Stamose v. Bulgaria» (2013), Menneson v. France (2014) і Labassee v. France (2014), Biao v. Denmark (2016), Ramadan v. Malta (2016), Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy (2017)).

The article deals with the analysis of the legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights formed in the process of hearing cases of human rights violations through language discrimination (discrimination on the basis of language) in the exercise of the right to education. On the basis of the analyzed legal positions it is possible to explain the unreasonableness of the requirements of some minority representatives to carry out the educational process exclusively in the language of the national minority, while ignoring the educational process in the state language.

The article analyzes the sphere of application for Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Based on the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, the distinction between the concepts of torture and inhuman treatment has been researched. Attention is drawn to the absolute character of Article 3 of the Convention, regardless of circumstances or situations.

The article examines aspects of observance of labor rights of women in Ukraine based on the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and national courts in this category of cases. It focuses on gender discrimination as one of the main causes of violation of labor rights of women. Тhe article attempts to determine the peculiarities of the legal proceeding of labor disputes, where one side is a female employee. The present study provides own approaches to solving a given issue.

This article by analyzing human’s dignity according to international standards. Considered scientific approaches to understanding the human dignity. In the article there are characterized the main international standards of the human’s right on dignity. The analysis of the European Court of Human Rights on this issue.