Computational Evaluation of Laplace Artificial Potential Field Methods for Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance in Gazebo

2025;
: pp. 1 - 9
1
Ivan Franko Lviv National University, Ukraine
2
Ivan Franko Lviv National University, Ukraine

the goal of this article is to present evaluation results for a proposed modification of the Artificial Potential Field Method (APFM). The mathematical model employs Laplace functions to compute repulsive fields to simplify calculations. Additionally, the study introduces a comprehensive evaluation framework using Gazebo and ROS2, designed to test various obstacle avoidance algorithms in simulated environments. Experiments have been conducted in a virtual room containing static obstacles of diverse shapes. The results demonstrate that the Laplace APFM effectively computes safe directional angles, enabling the robot to navigate smoothly and efficiently toward its target. The algorithm's performance have been validated through detailed analyses of LiDAR data, force calculations, and trajectory visualizations.

  1. Katona, K., Neamah, H. A., & Korondi, P. (2024). Obstacle avoidance and path planning methods for autonomous navigation of mobile robot. Sensors, 24(11),3573.https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113573
  2. Berizka, I. (2024). Path planning and obstacle avoidance methods for autonomous mobile robots. Electronics and information technologies. (28). 123-142.https://doi.org/10.30970/eli.28.11
  3. Siciliano, B Khatib, O. "Springer Handbook of Robotics", 2nd Edition, 2016, p. 1189.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1
  4. Fan, X., Guo, Y., Liu, H., Wei, B., & Lyu, W. (2020). Improved artificial potential field method applied for AUV path planning. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020(1), 6523158.https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6523158
  5. Cho, J. H., Pae, D. S., Lim, M. T., & Kang, T. K. (2018). A Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance Method for Autonomous Vehicles Using an Obstacle-Dependent Gaussian Potential Field. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018(1), 5041401.https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5041401
  6. Berizka, I. and Karbovnyk, I. (2024). Mathematical Model Of Modified Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance Method Based On Laplace Artificial Potential Field. Applied Problems of Computer Science, Security and Mathematics. 3 (Sep. 2024), 12-22.Available: https://apcssm.vnu.edu.ua/index.php/Journalone/article/view/123.
  7. Macenski, S., Martín, F., White, R., & Clavero, J. G. (2020, October). The marathon 2: A navigation system. In 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 2718-2725). IEEE.https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9341207
  8. Pardo-Castellote, G. (2003, May). Omg data-distribution service: Architectural overview. In 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, 2003. Proceedings. (pp. 200-206). IEEE.
  9. Kim, J., Smereka, J. M., Cheung, C., Nepal, S., & Grobler, M. (2018). Security and performance considerations in ros 2: A balancing act. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.09566.
  10. Kargar, S. M., Yordanov, B., Harvey, C., & Asadipour, A. (2024). Emerging trends in realistic robotic simulations: A comprehensive systematic literature review. IEEE Access. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3404881.https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3404881