Chemical, Spectral and Morphological Characterization of Humic Acids Extracted and Membrane Purified from Lignite

2020;
: pp. 353 - 361
1
Department of Agrotechnology, College of Abouraihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2
Department of Agrotechnology, College of Abouraihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3
Department of Agrotechnology, College of Abouraihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
4
Department of Agrotechnology, College of Abouraihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

In this study, humic substances were extracted from lignite of Zarand coalfields, Kerman, Iran, using a stirred batch reactor. A membrane ultrafiltration system was used to purify humic acids (HAs) from lignite-derived alkaline extracts obtained from the reactor. Gravimetric analysis along with several analytical methods including CHNOS, UV-Vis, FT-IR, ICP-OES and SEM were utilized to investigate the characteristics of the purified HAs. Gravimetric analysis showed that the purity of HA purified from membrane concentrated humates was higher than 95 %. CHNOS elemental analysis indicated the higher stability and condensation degree of the purified HA compared to the commercially available HAs. The ratios of E4/E6, E2/E3, and ΔlogK obtained from UV-Visible spectroscopy revealed that a purified HA had a higher molecular weight, aromaticity, and humification degree in comparison with commercial HAs. Furthermore, the peaks observed in the FT-IR analysis showed that HA had an aromatic structure. The very low concentrations of heavy metals and inorganic element contaminants observed by ICP-OES spectrometry showed a proper performance of the HA membrane purification. These results along with the results of SEM analysis showed the acceptable characteristics of purified HA from the lignite coal for agricultural and industrial applications.

  1. Canellas L., Oliveras F., Aguiar N. et al.: Sci. Hortic., 2015, 196, 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.013
  2. Savel’eva A., Mal’tseva E.,Yudina N.: Solid Fuel Chem., 2017, 51, 51. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0361521917010098
  3. De Melo B., Motta F., Santana M.: Mat. Sci. Eng. C, 2016, 62, 967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.001
  4. Enev V., Pospisilova L., Klucakova M. et al.: Soil Water Res., 2014, 9, 9. https://doi.org/10.17221/39/2013-SWR
  5. Pena-Mendez E., Havel J., Patocka J.: J. Appl. Biomed., 2005, 3, 13. https://doi.org/10.32725/jab.2005.002
  6. Giannouli A., Kalaitzidis S., Siavalas G. et al.: Int. J. Coal Geol., 2009, 77, 383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2008.07.008
  7. Peuravuori J., Zbankova P., Pihlaja K.: Fuel Process. Technol., 2006, 87, 829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.05.003
  8. Das T., Saikia B., Bourah B., Das D.: J. Geol. Soc. India, 2015, 86, 468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-015-0334-0
  9. Giovanela M., Crespo J., Antunes M. et al.: J. Mol. Struct., 2010, 981, 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2010.07.038
  10. Martins J., Xavier D., Silva A. et al.: Int. J. Agric. Sci., 2012, 4, 238. https://doi.org/10.9735/0975-3710.4.5.238-242
  11. Zara M., Ahmad Z., Akhtar J. et al.: Energ. Source A., 2017, 39, 1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2017.1307886
  12. Kurkova M., Klika Z., Klikova C., Havel J.: Chemosphere, 2004, 54, 1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.10.020
  13. Moosavi Rad S.: Geochemical Studies of Pabedana Coal Mine Tailings, South East of Iran and Their Effect on Environment Using GIS Techniques. Ph.D. thesis, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, India, 2010.
  14. Ozkan S., Ozkan S.: Int. J. Coal Prep. Util., 2016, 37, 285. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2016.1171761
  15. Canieren O., Karaguzel C., Aydin A.: Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process., 2017, 53, 502. https://doi.org/10.5277/ppmp170139
  16. Saito B., Seckler M.: Braz. J. Chem. Eng., 2014, 31, 675. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-6632.20140313s00002512
  17. Pospisilova L., Fasurova N., Barancikova G., Liptaj T.: Petrol. Coal, 2008, 50, 30.
  18. Pospisilova L., Fasurova N.: Soil Water Res., 2011, 6, 147. https://doi.org/10.17221/21/2010-SWR
  19. Pospisilova L., Fasurova N.: J. Cent. Europ. Agr., 2010, 11, 351. https://doi.org/10.5513/jcea.v11i3.842
  20. Georgakopoulos A., Iordanidis A., Kapina V.: Energ. Source., 2003, 25, 995.
  21. http://www.humicsubstances.org/
  22. Lamar R., Talbot K.: Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 2009, 40, 2309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620903111251
  23. Lamar R., Olk D., Mayhew L., Bloom P.: J. AOAC Int., 2014, 97, 721. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.13-393
  24. Shakiba N.: Investigation of the effective parameters on separation and purification of humic acid from the Leonardite humate using a proper filter. M.Sc. thesis, University of Tehran, Iran, 2016.
  25. Prosyolkov N., Glukhovtsev V., Kapkin N. et al.: Pat. RU 2473527, Publ. Jan. 27, 2013.
  26. Dick D., Mangrichb A., Menezesc S., Pereira B.: J. Brazil. Chem. Soc., 2002, 13, 177. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532002000200008
  27. Fong S., Lau I., Chong W. et al.: J. Brazil. Chem. Soc., 2006, 17, 582. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532006000300023
  28. Das T., Saikia B., Baruah B.: J. Indian Chem. Soc., 2013, 90, 2007.
  29. Saikia B., Baruah R., Gogoi P.: J. Earth Syst. Sci., 2007, 116, 575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-007-0052-0
  30. Saikia B., Sahu O., Boruah R.: J. Geol. Soc. India, 2007, 70, 917.
  31. Olivella M., Sole M., Gorchs R. et al.: Arch. Min. Sci., 2011, 56, 789.
  32. Ketris M., Yudovich Y.: Int. J. Coal Geol., 2009, 78, 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2009.01.002
  33. Novak J., Kozler J., Janoš P.: React. Funct. Polym., 2001, 47, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-5148(00)00076-6
  34.  https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31986L0278