Administrative and legal characteristics of court decisions

2023;
: 140-147

Citation APA: Blikhar M. (2023) Administrative and legal characteristics of court decisions. Bulletin of Lviv Polytechnic National University. Series: Legal Sciences.  Vol. 10, No. 1(37), pp. 140-147 https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.37.140

Authors:
1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Institute for Law, Psychology, and Innovative Education

The article proves the relevance of the study of the administrative and legal characteristics of court decisions in view of modern significance of the solution to this scientific problem, which is determined by the expression of legal reality within the scope of the administration of justice. This will provide an opportunity not only to substantiate the understanding of the phenomenon of justice as a way of exercising judicial power from the point of view of administrative law, but also to identify areas that need improvement. In this context, one of these areas is judicial decisions, because the modern interpretation of law as a system that regulates relations in the subsystems "man – man", "man – society" and "man – state" accumulates anthropological and humanistic dimensions. Therefore, the court, as an institution aimed at resolving disputes arising in these subsystems, is called upon to issue primarily legally based decisions. During the analysis of the declared issues, it was found that on the basis of the understanding of the administrative and legal principles of court decisions, the possibility of researching still unresolved legal problems of the judiciary, including the legality of such decisions as the concept of legal reality, raising the level of legal awareness, and forming law-abiding behavior, is actualized. Moreover, it makes it possible to assert that the higher the level of law and order in the state, the lower the level of crimes. Therefore, the article emphasizes the importance of recognizing that each of the participants in the legal process – the plaintiff and the defendant, has the right to submit data on the basis of which the court can draw conclusions about the presence or absence of signs of an offense in the actions (inaction) of the parties and force the participants in the legal process to perform certain actions. Under such conditions, the thesis is confirmed that the number of offenses is lower in those countries where the level of law and order is consistently high, and, therefore, the number of appeals to court to restore violated rights and freedoms is much lower than in those countries where the level of law and order is lower. Thus, the article makes it possible to state that in such states a significant percentage of the population consciously builds their behavior in accordance with the requirements of the law, and relations in the subsystem "man - state" are based on the principles of legality, mutual respect, recognition of a man as the greatest value of the state, etc. The legal order, which directly affects the presentation of evidence in administrative proceedings, is also well-founded, since the number of people who are consciously guided in their behavior by the requirements of the law increases every time, and, accordingly, these people do not allow violations of the law or violations against themselves in their professional activities from the side of public administration; constant development of legislation, reforming of the domestic legal system contributes to the emergence of the need for a man to deepen his legal knowledge.

1. Podorozhna T., Ovcharenko O. (2019). Natsionalna bezpeka ta konstytutsiinyi pravoporiadok yak chynnyky zabezpechennia prav liudyny. [National security and constitutional law and order as factors of ensuring human rights]. Prava liudyny i natsionalna bezpeka: zbirn. materialiv Mizhnar. nauk. prakt. konf. (m. Kyiv, 27 chervnia 2019 r.). Kyiv : VAITE. P. 232–240 [in Ukrainian].

2. Bandurka O. M. (2019). Administratyvnyi protses Ukrainy. [Administrative process of Ukraine]: monohrafiia. Kharkiv : KhNUVS, Maidan [in Ukrainian].

3. Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy. [Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine]. URL : https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15#Text [in Ukrainian].

4. Dzhafarova M. V. (2020). Okremi pytannia dokazuvannia v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi v Ukraini./ [Separate issues of eevidentiality in administrative proceedings in Ukraine]. Pravo i suspilstvo. No. 5. P. 69–75. URL : https://doi.org/10.32842/2078-3736/2020.5.10 [in Ukrainian].

5. Hordieiev V. V., Huralenko N. A. (2021). Osnovni osoblyvosti administratyvnoho sudochynstva. [Main features of administrative proceedings]. Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriia: Pravo. No. 4 (74). P. 112–117. URL : https://doi.org/10.32840/1813-338X-2021.4.17 [in Ukrainian].

6. Blikhar M. M. (2022). Vplyv pravoporiadku na podannia dokaziv: kohnityvnyi dysonans ta administratyvno-pravova kharakterystyka. [The influence of law and order on the presentation of evidence: cognitive dissonance and administrative-legal characteristics]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pravo. No. 73. T. 2. P. 206–210. URL : https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2022.73.61 [in Ukrainian].

7. Pavlyshyn O. V. (2019). Semiotyka prava yak metodolohichna paradyhma novitnoho filosofskopravovoho dyskursu. [Semiotics of law as a methodological paradigm of the latest philosophical and legal discourse] : Doctor’s thesis. URL : http://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/12957 [in Ukrainian].

8. Hvozdik O. I. (2019). Sudovo-protsesualne dokazuvannia v lohichnomu vymiri. [Judicial and procedural evidence in a logical dimension]. Filosofski ta metodolohichni problemy prava. No. 1 (17). P. 83–89. URL : https://doi.org/10.33270/01191702.83 [in Ukrainian].

9. Melnyk Ya. Ya. (2020). Kontseptsiia semiotyky u sotsialnomu pravi: problemy doktrynalnoi polityky. [The concept of semiotics in social law: problems of doctrinal policy]. Aktualni problemy prava: teoriia i praktyka. No. 1 (39). P. 91–97. URL : https://doi.org/10.33216/2218-5461-2020-39-1-91-97.

10. Alshawabkeh Faisal, Almajali Mohmmad Husien. (2021). The influence of the jurisprudence administrative on the Cancellation Case; “Analytical study”. Heliyon. Vol. 7. Issуе. 3. URL : https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06471.

11. Frumarová K. (2020). Evidence in administrative proceedings - proof by audio-visual record, proof by the content of the website and other means of proof lacking an explicit regulation in the Code of Administrative Procedure. Institutiones Administrationis Journal of Administrative Sciences. Vol. 2. Issуе. 1. P. 132–143. URL : https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.v2i1.31.

12. Бліхар М. М. (2022). Семіотична перспектива доказовості судових рішень: адміністративноправова характеристика. [Semiotic perspective of evidentiality of court decisions: administrative and legal characteristics]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pravo. No. 74. T. 2. P. 34–38. URL : https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2022.74.38 [in Ukrainian].