The article examines aspects of the generalization of problems in the field of integrity of judges in modern conditions of political and legal reality.
The integrity of judges is the basis for ensuring civil rights and freedoms, as well as for fulfilling the important role of judges in ensuring a just society. In the context of judicial reform in Ukraine, the integrity of judges acts as a strategic tool for ensuring the independence and transparency of the judicial system, contributes to strengthening citizens' trust in the judiciary and increasing the authority of the court in society.
It has been established that in the context of the purification of the judiciary, the integrity of the courts becomes a key tool for identifying and using negative phenomena, such as corruption, impartiality and other violations of ethical norms. This requires judges to follow not only the letter of the law, but also the higher principles of justice, which are based on general human rights and principles of justice.
It is motivated that trust in the judicial system is based on society's deep understanding of equality before the law and the independence of the judiciary from the influence of political or other external factors, acting as a key element of the legitimation of power and the legal system as a whole. Therefore, it is summarized that the judicial system, as a reflector in the entire legal system, bears a huge responsibility to society and the state as a whole, contributing to establishing trust in the legal system and supporting the principles of equality and justice.
The following problems in the field of integrity of judges in the modern political and legal reality are singled out: moral instability of representatives of the judiciary and the dilemma of individual morality in the context of a court decision; political influence on judges and the process of administration of justice; systemic defects and moral and ethical orientation of the judicial system, here it is important to take into account that the judicial system itself can write internal defects and conflicts of interests that can undermine the integrity of judges; intercultural dissonance and problems of sociocultural adaptation of judges in international aspects of the implementation of multifaceted social space.
1. Paruta O., Harasymiv T., Lychenko I., Kotukha O., Chornopyska, V. (2023). Legal Socialization in the Context of Global Transformations. European Review, 31(3), 273-290.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798723000066 [in English];
2. Smidova, Z., Cavaciuti A,. Johnsøn J. (2022) Anti-corruption and public integrity strategies - Insights from new OECD indicators, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 1725, OECD Publishing, Paris, URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/a925c7fd-en. [in English];
3. Szwed, M. (2023). Fixing the Problem of Unlawfully Appointed Judges in Poland in the Light of the ECHR. Hague J Rule Law 15, 353–384 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-023-00191-3 [in English];
4. European Court of Human Rights (2021), Reczkowicz v. Poland, application no. 43447/19, judgment, 22 July 2021[in English];
5. European Court of Human Rights (2021), Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v. Poland, applications nos. 49868/19 and 57511/19, judgment, 8 November 2021 [in English];
6. European Court of Human Rights (2022), Advance Pharma sp. z o.o. v. Poland, application no. 1469/20, judgment, 3 February 2022 [in English];
7. European Court of Human Rights (2022), Juszczyszyn v. Poland, application no. 35599/20, judgment, 6 October 2022. [in English]