This article examines the complexity of the electronic justice system by determining its main components and their importance for the administration of justice.
The author states that electronic justice is an advanced method of administering justice, based on the use of modern information technologies. Electronic justice is extremely relevant in the judicial reform paradigm, which is characterized by the use of advanced information technologies for optimization and modernization. The progressive aspect transforms the traditional judicial process, giving it new possibilities of efficiency, transparency and openness. It opens the way to the creation of a highly efficient and modern judicial system that meets the requirements of the modern legal environment and high standards of judicial practice.
It is emphasized that electronic justice in the context of war plays an important role in ensuring justice and law and order. Key aspects in wartime include quick and effective access to justice, transparency and openness, preservation and analysis of evidence, security and privacy, and the ability to conduct trials in remote space. Thus, e-justice plays a key role in ensuring law and order and justice in the conditions of military conflict, providing effective and reliable tools to ensure the rights and interests of citizens.
It is proven that its components include electronic court systems that automate judicial proceedings and optimize the processes of case consideration; electronic files that structure and provide access to court data and documents; electronic communication, which facilitates interaction between participants in the legal process through electronic channels; and electronic monitoring that analyzes and monitors aspects of judicial activity.
Electronic justice and its components contribute to improving the efficiency and transparency of the judicial system, providing better access to information and facilitating the execution of court decisions. They are necessary tools for a modern legal system aimed at ensuring fairness, efficiency and openness.
1. Zharovska I. M., Kovalchuk V. B. Tsyfrovi tekhnolohii u vyborchomu protsesi: teoretychni aspekty vidpovidnosti demokratychnym standartam [Digital technologies in the electoral process: theoretical aspects of compliance with democratic standards]. ScienceRise. Juridical Science. 2020. № 4. S. 4-10 [in Ukraine].
2. Cordella A., Contini F. Digital Technologies for Better Justice A Toolkit for Action. Institutions for Development Sector. 2020. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Antonio Cordella/publication/34190... Action/links/5ed8fd65458515294531523e/Digital-Technologies-for-Better-Justice-A Toolkit-for-Action.pdf [in English].https://doi.org/10.18235/0002297
3. Joaquín S., Reem A. R., Meinel C. Delivering Digital Justice: Liminal Innovation & Permanence in Courts. ACIS Proceedings. 2021. Vol. 34. URL: https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2021/34 [in English].
4. Re R.M., Solow-Niederman A. Developing Artificially Intelligent Justice. STAN. TECH. L. REV. 2019. Vol. 22 (242) [in English].
5. Noiret S., Lumetzberger, Kampel M. Bias and Fairness in Computer Vision Applications of the Criminal Justice System, 2021 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), Orlando, FL, USA, 2021, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/SSCI50451.2021.9660177 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI50451.2021.9660177