The article is devoted to the philosophical analysis of important aspects of man’s being, connected with spreading of photography in the modern society. In the investigation of this subject, authors examine the usage of the Poststructuralist Methodology. The objective of the article is to define the poststructuralist methodological concepts spread in the humanitarian studies. The authors focus on several principles of poststructuralist methodology, especially on the principle of structure, the principle of differences, deconstruction, and transgression. Usage of this principle is the reason of forming the conception of photography as a part of the new anthropological reality of the European culture. The article investigates works of the famous philosophical theory of photography, especially by Rolan Bartbes. The authors demonstrate his position concerning essence, the structure of photography, and its influence on the being of a person and changes in society. For example, R. Bartbes examines static and dynamic structural elements of photography in a unity. It creates the image of photography process as relations between people. The authors demonstrate that appearance and spread of photography coincide with the epoch of protests, revolutions, attacks, etc. In this context, photography is represented as a symptom of crisis processes in European communities. The article deduces constructive possibility of the Poststructuralist Methodology in the fields where traditional methods of philosophical analysis are not effective.
Arnkheym, R. (1994). Blesk i nishcheta fotografa. [In Russian]. In Novye ocherki po psikhologii iskusstva. (pp.119-132). Moskwa: Prometey.
Bart, R. (1997). Camera lucida. Kommentariy k fotografii. [In Russian]. Moskwa: Ad Marginem, 1997.
Bart, R. (2003). Fotograficheskoe soobshchenie. [In Russian]. In R. Bart, Sistema Mody. Stati po semiotike kultury. (pp.378-392). Moskwa: Izdatelstvo imeni Sabashnikovykh.
Bart, R. (2008). Ritorika obraza. [In Russian]. In Nulevaya stepen pisma. (pp. 252-274). Moskwa: Akademicheskiy proekt.
Batchen, G. (2002). Each Wild Idea: Writing, Photography, History. Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
Bazin, A. (1967). The Ontology of the Photographic Image. In What Is Camera? In Volume 1, pp. 9-16. Berkele and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Benyamin, V. (1996). Kratkaya istoriya fotografii. [In Russian]. In Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti. Izbrannye esse. (pp.66-91). Moskwa: no publisher.
Chursinova, O. (2015). Tekhnika i tekhnichnyi prohres u kontseptsiiakh suchasnykh ukrainskykh myslyteliv. [In Ukrainian]. In Aktualni problemy filosofii ta sotsiolohii. Seriia: Filosofiia : Naukovo-praktychnyi zhurnal, 6, pp.159-162. Odesa : Vydavnychyi dim “Helvetyka”.
Derrida, J. (1967). De la Grammatologie. Paris: Les Edition de Minuit.
Dyakov, A. (2010). Rolan Bart kak on jest'. [In Russian]. Sankt Petersburg: Izdatelstvo “Vladimir Dal”.
Fuko, M. (1996). Arkheologiya znaniya. [In Russian]. Kiev: Nika-Tsentr.
Kristeva, J. (1979). Folle verite. [Seminaire de Julia Kristeva, edite par J. M. Ribbettes]. Paris: Seuil (Tel Quel).
Lacan, J. (1973). Le Seminare, Livre XI. Paris, Seul.
Levashov, V. (2007). Lektsii po istorii fotografii. [In Russian]. Novyi Novgorod: Nizhegorodskiy filial GTsSI.
Mazin, V. (2010). Subjekt Freyda i Derrida. [In Russian]. Sankt Petersburg: Aleteyya, 2010
Povtoreva, S. (2010). Strukturnyi pidkhid – strukturalizm – poststrukturalizm (evoliutsiia metodolohii ta yii poshyrennia u humanitarnykh studiiakh. [In Ukrainian]. Lviv: Vyd-vo Natsionalnoho universytetu “Lvivska politekhnika”.
Povtoreva, S. (2015). Poststrukturalistski kontsepty vidsutno sti struktury i porozhnoho mistsia yak symptomy kryzy. [In Ukrainian]. In Naukovyi visnyk Chernivetskoho universytetu. Zbirnyk nauk. prats, 756 – 757, 97–102.
Savchuk, V. (2005). Filosofiya fotografii. [In Russian]. Sankt Petersburg: Izd-vo SPbGU.