The problem of forming a highly competitive national economy is currently key, as practice shows that the majority of domestic economic entities are uncompetitive on world markets, which is confirmed by the results of the ratings of leading international organizations, according to which Ukraine occupies one of the last places among the studied countries. That is why there is a need to investigate in detail the issue of rating enterprises both on the national and international markets. Scientists in their works [1–8] interpret certain aspects of rating in slightly different ways, but it is still possible to generalize their interpretation in the definition of “rating – a comprehensive assessment of the production, financial and economic, marketing, personnel and other spheres of the enterprise’s activity and the conclusion on this based on the rating”.
The use of modern rating tools when conducting competitive positions in foreign markets analysis is crucial for enterprises as the number of enterprises and the competitiveness between them grows continuously. The accurate use of modern enterprise ranking tools is required for the effective analysis of competitive positions in foreign markets.
This article analyzes the implications of enterprise use of modern rating tools and emphasizes the main problems that companies may encounter when conducting rating, for instance, lack of transparency, subjectivity, rating agencies’ lack of credibility, rating duration, etc. The article points out the shortcomings of monocriteria rating approach and provides arguments in support of the transition from monocriteria to polycriteria approach. It formulates the main steps for the introduction of the poly- criteria rating: information management, input (ХІ) matrices arrangement, (ZІ) matrices arrangement (based on standardization of (ХІ) matrices elements), sample determination, calculation of the rating scores, and formation of the final ratings. In general, ranking in enterprises is essential for establishing the competitive position of a product, service or company as a whole. Marketing rating itself will provide an opportunity to objectively assess the position of a specific enterprise, based on the assessments of consumers, business partners, or even the state. This type of evaluation can be carried out by means of presenting goods at exhibitions and fairs, questionnaires and surveys of consumers – a large target group or a limited group of experts. Thanks to this, it is possible to quickly and with high accuracy determine the current rating of popularity, competitiveness and significance of the company both on the domestic and foreign markets.
- Logvynenko Yu. L. (2009). Systematyzatsiya informatsiynykh dzherel dlya reytynhuvannya mashynobudivnykh pidpryyemstv [Systematization of information sources for rating machine-building enterprises]. Naukovyy visnyk NLTU Ukrayiny [Scientific Bulletin of National Technical University of Ukraine], 19.13. 278–289 (in Ukrainian).
- Prokhorova V. V. (2009). Metodychni osnovy pobudovy intehralʹnykh ta reytynhovykh otsinok ekonomichnykh system [Methodological basis of construction of integral and rating evaluations of economic systems]. Visnyk ekonomiky transportu i promyslovosti [Herald of Transport and Industry Economics], 28, 54–59 (in Ukrainian).
- Kuzmin O. Ye., Melnyk O. G., Yurynets O. V., Chyrkova Yu. L. (2013). Reytynhuvannya diyalʹnosti promyslovykh pidpryyemstv. Teoretychni ta metodychni polozhennya: monohrafiya [Rating of industrial enterprises. Theoretical and methodical provisions: monograph]. Lʹviv: Rastr-7 [Lviv: Rastr-7 Publishing House] (in Ukrainian).
- Kovalenko Yu. M. (2018). Zlovzhyvannya u sferi reytynhovykh posluh na finansovomu rynku i mozhlyvosti yikh usunennya [Abuse in the sphere of rating services on the financial market and the possibilities of their elimination]. Finansove pravo [Financial law], 1(15), 29–32 (in Ukrainian).
- Prymak T. O. (2013). Marketynhovi pidkhody u reytynhuvanni pidpryyemstv sfery posluh. Reytynh stomatolohichnykh klinik m. Kyyeva [Marketing approaches in the rating of enterprises in the service sector. Rating of dental clinics in Kyiv]. Ekonomichnyy visnyk Natsionalʹnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu Ukrayiny “Kyyivsʹkyy politekhnichnyy instytut” [Economic Bulletin of the National Technical University of Ukraine “Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”], 10, 404–412. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/evntukpi_2013_10_68/ (in Ukrainian).
- Rebryk M. A. (2016). Analiz masshtabiv kontsentratsiyi rynku reytynhovykh posluh Ukrayiny [Analysis of the scale of concentration of the rating services market of Ukraine]. Hlobalʹni ta natsionalʹni problemy ekonomiky [Global and National Problems of Economics], 11, 778–785. Retrieved from: http://global-national.in.ua/archive/11- 2016/162.pdf (in Ukrainian).
- Makovoz O. S. (2018). Marketynhovyy reytynh yak faktor konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryyemstva [Marketing rating as a factor of enterprise competitiveness]. Visnyk Kam'yanetsʹ-Podilʹsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ohiyenka. Ekonomichni nauky [Bulletin of the Kamianets-Podilskyi National University named after Ivan Ohienko. Economic sciences], 11, 473–479. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN /vkpnuen_2018_11_66 (in Ukrainian).
- Cherep O. G., Kurdupa V. S. (2022). Otsinka konkurentospromozhnosti Ukrayiny [Assessment of the competitiveness of Ukraine]. Visnyk Khmelʹnytsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky [Bulletin of Khmelnytskyi National University. Economic sciences], 1, 31–36 (in Ukrainian).
- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky Wins the 2022 TIME100 Reader Poll/ Retrieved from: https://time.com/6177642/2022-time100-reader-poll-winner-volodymyr-zelensky/?fbclid=IwAR0hVDN_m6VLBV7kGKt LdK43XBpiWcLF6QfocekdnSzL3tgAQN WmJKb7uA (in Ukrainian).
- 2022 Military Strength Ranking. Retrieved from: https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.php (in Ukrainian).