Phenomenon of religious identity: philosophical and legal construction of the content
The article reveals the phenomenon of religious identity within the framework of the philosophical and legal discourse.
The article reveals the phenomenon of religious identity within the framework of the philosophical and legal discourse.
The article reveals the mechanisms of influence of religious organizations on international relations and the dynamics of their influence on the solution of international legal problems in the conditions of globalization. In the conditions of globalization of world processes and growing tendencies towards interdependence in international relations, religion acts as an optimal mode of self-identification of individual countries, interstate associations and unions.
The article formulates the paradigm of the development of medical law in Ukraine, and also considers the constituent elements that form it. We believe that the legal relations included in the subject of medical law should be divided into two groups. The first group is represented by those relations that arise during the implementation of medical activities in the process of providing medical assistance. That is, the relationship between the doctor and the patient during the implementation of the first diagnostic, treatment and preventive measures.
The article substantiates the proposition about the expediency of considering legal identity as a special form of social identity and reveals its essence as a legal category.
The article presents and analyzes the key theoretical and methodological problems and prospects for the harmonization of national legislation to international legal standards. Four stages of harmonization processes are distinguished: the stage of formation of the national legal mechanism (program) of harmonization of Ukrainian legislation with international legal standards.
The article reveals the problems of the interaction mechanism of national legislation and international legal standards through a historical prism in the context of modern realities. It has been found that the modern legal doctrine of Ukraine in matters of interaction of the national legal system and the system of national legislation with the system of international law recognizes only the partial primacy of international law, which is limited by the Constitution of Ukraine.
The relevance of the problem study of legal understanding shall be determined by a combination of ideological, social and political factors, including the urgent need to comprehend legal understanding as the most important regulator of social relations, as well as the need for a critical rethinking of traditional concepts of legal understanding.
The article identifies the theoretical, methodological and practical principles of military law as a separate branch of law and clarifies its place and role in the legal system of Ukraine. Definitely. That military law is a system of universally binding norms, formally defined rules of conduct in the militarypublic sphere, which are established, protected and provided by the state and regulate public relations related to the military organization of society and aimed at protecting the state, sovereignty, territorial integrity.
The article analyzes global civil society as a phenomenon of the modern world and identifies prospects for its development. Thus, global civil society could become a new model of development, which would dramatically increase investment in human resources and social security while reducing the participation of the state and attracting new actors; it is a desirable form of world association of peoples, nations, transnational communities.
The article, based on the theoretical concepts of A. Gramsci and T. Parsons, defines the philosophical and legal foundations of the civil society model. In the twentieth century. some attempts have been made to develop a theory of civil society on a foundation. First of all, it should be noted such well-known scientists as A. Gramsch and T. Parsons, who were influenced by the teachings of G. Hegel and at the same time made adjustments to his theory, comparing civil society and economy, civil society and the state.