The article analyzes global civil society as a phenomenon of the modern world and identifies prospects for its development. Thus, global civil society could become a new model of development, which would dramatically increase investment in human resources and social security while reducing the participation of the state and attracting new actors; it is a desirable form of world association of peoples, nations, transnational communities. Given the uncertain prospects for the institutionalization of power (centralized) structures at the global level, it can be predicted that it will operate “soft” forms of regulation – the international class of experts and other forms of civil society. But the actors of global civil society, in particular international non-governmental organizations, remain marginal actors, at best with indirect influence on certain aspects of (inter) state decision-making. The political sphere is mostly closed to non-governmental organizations. Of course, under the influence of globalization, civil society is expanding, transnational communities, transnational non-governmental organizations, global movements, international scientific and professional associations, etc. are being formed. That is, a unique social space is being formed, basic universal rights are being improved, and an attempt is being made to prevent global threats without the participation of states. But a realistic assessment of this process indicates a still rather vague perspective on the genesis of the phenomenon of global civil society, which is burdened by numerous inhibitory mechanisms.
Kant Y. (1999). Ydeia vseobshchei ystoryy vo vsemyrno-hrazhdanskom plane. Metafyzycheskye nachala estestvoznanyia [The idea of universal history in the world-civil plan. Metaphysical principles of natural science]. Moskva: Mыsl. 1712 p. 2. Shepeliev M. (2013). Hlobalne hromadianske suspilstvo yak kontsept i sotsialna realnist [Global civil society as a concept and social reality.]. Visnyk Lvivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. Ivana Franka. Seriia : Mizhnarodni vidnosyny. Vyp. 33. P. 25-38. 3. Buriak V. V. (2011). Hlobalnoe hrazhdanskoe obshchestvo y setevыe revoliutsyy [Global civil society and network revolutions]. Symferopol : DYAIPY, 152 p. 4. Poltorakov O. Yu. (2008). Hlobalne hromadianske suspilstvo v systemi mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn [Global civil society in the system of international relations.]. Doslidzhennia svitovoi polityky: zb. nauk. prats. In-t svitovoi ekonomiky i mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn NAN Ukrainy. Vyp. 44. P. 155. 5. Keane J. (2003). Global Civil Society? [Global Civil Society?] (Contemporary Political Theory). London: Cambridge University Press, 236 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615023 6. Khoma N. M. (2015). Hlobalne hromadianske suspilstvo : utopiia chy perspektyvna realnist [Global civil society: utopia or perspective reality]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii kerivnykh kadriv kultury i mystetstv. № 2. P. 166. 7. Tsymbal T. V. (2008). Znyknennia «inshykh» yak oznaka hlobalnoi systemy [The disappearance of "others" as a sign of the global system. "Shevchenko's Spring": materials intern ]. «Shevchenkivska vesna»: materialy mizhn. nauk.-prakt. konf. Vyp. IV. Ch. 1. K. : Kyiv. nats. un-t im. Tarasa Shevchenka, P. 171-173. 8. Sydorenko S. V. (2013). Politychne protystoiannia stratehii «zmitsnennia hromadianskoho suspilstva» v krainakh Afryky [Political confrontation between the strategy of "strengthening civil society" in Africa]. Humanitarnyi visnyk ZDIA. № 55. P. 140-141. 9. Afonin E., Bielska (2013).T. Hlobalne hromadianske suspilstvo yak fenomen suchasnoho hlobalnoho svitu [Global civil society as a phenomenon of the modern global world]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii derzhavnoho upravlinnia pry Prezydenti Ukrainy. № 4. P. 13. 10. Vinnykova N. (2015). Hnuchke upravlinnia [lexible management.]. Novitnia politychna leksyka (neolohizmy, okazionalizmy ta inshi novotvory). I. Ya. Vdovychyn, L. Ya. Uhryn, H. V. Shypunov ta in.; za zah. red. N. M. Khomy. Lviv: Novyi svit-2000, 492 p