У сучасному глобалізованому світі громадянство – це один із найважливіших та найфундаментальніших правових інститутів, які визначають правовий статус особи, а також дихотомію взаємовідносин між особою та державою. Розмірковуючи під правовим кутом зору, вважаємо, що право кожної особи на громадянство, яке є особистим невід’ємним, немайновим та невідчужуваним правом. У світі з давніх-давен громадянство було саме тим правовим індикатором і гуманітарним стандартом, який покликаний убезпечити політичну особливість та конституційну (національну) ідентичність кожної держави і гарантувати їй певну самобутність, збалансований та стабільний розвиток, незважаючи на перманентну геополітичну турбулентність у світовому масштабі. Однак, такі гарантії повинні бути синхронізованими із поступовою інтеграцією громадян у суспільство, їхньою інклюзивністю в життєдіяльність держави, гарантуванням прав людини, поваги до їхнього приватного та сімейного життя, зменшенням проявів (прямої/непрямої) дискримінації. Це доводять проаналізовані нами рішення Європейського суду з прав людини у справах (Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. The United Kingdom (1985), Riener v. Bulgaria (2006), Genovese v. Malta (2012), Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxemburg (2007), Stamose v. Bulgaria» (2013), Menneson v. France (2014) і Labassee v. France (2014), Biao v. Denmark (2016), Ramadan v. Malta (2016), Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy (2017).
1.UNHCR Statistics: The World in Numbers. Retrieved from: http://popstats.unhcr.org/en/overview. (accessed: 22.04.2020). 2.The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the European Convention on Human Rights, 4 November 1950. Retrieved from: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf. (accessed on: 15.02.2020). 3.European Convention on Nationality, 06.11.1997, ETS No. 166. (URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/166) accessed on: 15.02.2020. 4.Bellamy, R. Citizenship: A Very Short Introduction Oxford University Press, 2008. 152 p. 5.Weil, P. From conditional to secured and sovereign: The new strategic link between the citizen and the nationstate in a globalized world. International Journal of Constitutional Law, Volume 9, Issue 3-4, 2011, pp. 615-35. 6.Habermas, J. ‘Citizenship and National Identity’ in Condition of Citizenship by Steenbergen, Bart Van ed, SAGE Publications, 1994. pp. 20-35. 7.Joppke, Ch. ‘Liberal Citizenship Is Duty-Free’ in RSCAS “Should EU citizenship be duty-free?” European University Institute, 2017, pp. 2-8. 8.Carens, J. ‘Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders’ in Kymlicka W (ed), The Rights of Minority Cultures, Oxford University Press, 1995, 387 p.9.Sofinska, І. (2018) Filosofs’ko-pravova vizija gromadjanstwa. [Philosophic and legal vision of citizenship doctrine]. Lviv: Kamenyar, 346 p. [in Ukrainian]. 10.Shachar, A. and Bauböck, R. and Bloemraad, I. and Vink, M. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship, Oxford University Press, 2017. 816 р. 11. Citizenship by Shaw Desmond (London: Hodder and Stroughton Limited, 1922) pp. 1-4. 12.Déclaration des Droits de l’Homme et du Citoyen de 1789. Retrieved from: http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/francais/la-constitution/la-consti... (accessed on: 22.02.2020). 13.The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The travaux préparatoires (Volume I. October 1946 to November 1947) Cambridge University Press, 2014. 823 p. 14.Spiro, P. The (Dwindling) Rights and Obligations of Citizenship. William & Mary Bill Rights Journal, Volume 21, Issue 899, 2013. pp. 899-923. 15. Gibney, M. ‘Theresa May must not further erode Britons’ rights to citizenship’ (The Guardian, 14 November 2013) Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/14/theresa-may-erode-.... (accessed on: 21.04.2020). 16. Bauböck, R. Stakeholder Citizenship: An Idea Whose Time Has Come? Migration Policy Institute, 2008. P. 3. 17.Shevchuk, S. Sudovyj zaxyst praw ljudyny. Praktyka Jevropejs’koho sudu z praw ljudyny u konteksti zaxidnoji pravovoji tradyciji. [Judicial protection of human rights. Case law of the European Court of Human Rights in the context of the Western legal tradition]. 2nd edition. Kyiv: Referat, 2007. P. 362. [in Ukrainian]. 18. Reid, K. A Practitioner's Guide to the European Convention on Human Rights. 5th edition. Sweet & Maxwell: 2015. pp. 667–669. 19. Bloustein, Е. Privacy as an Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answer to Dean Prosser. New York University Law Review, Volume 39, 1964. Р. 971. 20. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in case of «Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. The United Kingdom» (1985) Retrieved from: http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/womenandiustice/upload/Abdulaziz.pdf. (accessed on: 22.04.2020). 21.Timmer, A. Toward an Anti-Stereotyping Approach for the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, Volume 11, Issue 4, 2011, pp. 707-738. 22.Judgment of the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights in case of «Riener v. Bulgaria» (2006) Retrieved from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22tabview%22:[%22document%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-75463%22]}. (accessed on: 22.04.2020). 23. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in case of «Genovese v. Malta» (2012) Retrieved from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106785. (accessed on: 22.04.2020). 24.de Groot, R.-G. and Vonk, O. Nationality, Statelessness and ECHR’s Article 8: Comments on Genovese v. Malta. European Journal of Migration and Law, Volume 14, Issue 3, 2012. pp. 317–325. 25. Judgment of the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights in case «Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxemburg» (2007) Retrieved from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"appno":["76240/01"],"documentcollectionid2":["CASELAW"],"itemid":["001-81328"]}. 25.Judgment of the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights in case «Stamose v. Bulgaria» (2013) Retrieved from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-115160%22]}. (accessed on: 22.04.2020). 27.Džankić, J. The Global Market for Investor Citizenship, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. pp. 8-12. 28. Sofinska, I. Money-based Citizenship Acquisition vs. Country Belonging Wordwide. Ianus - Diritto e Finanza, Rivista di studi giuridici. n. 19 - giugno 2019. pp. 235–250. 29. Judgment of the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights in case of «Mennesson v. France» (2014) Retrieved from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"itemid":["001-145179"]}. (accessed on: 22.04.2020). 30.Judgment of the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights in case of «Labassee v. France» (2014) Retrieved from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"itemid":["001-145180"]}. (accessed on: 22.04.2020). 31. Code civil / Législation, Musée Criminocorpus publié le 25 juin 2014, consulté le 23 novembre 2017. Retrieved from: https://criminocorpus.org/fr/reperes/legislation/versions/698/57/diff/pdf/. (accessed on: 22.04.2020). 32. Poiedynok, O. ‘Nekonventsiine pravo? Pravo na hromadianstvo v praktytsi Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny ta Yevropeiskoi komisii z prav liudyny’ [‘Unconventional right? The right to citizenship in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Commission of Human Rights’] v Repetskyi V. ta Hutnyk V. (red), Suchasni problemy mizhnarodnoho prava. Liber Amicorum do 60-richchia prof M. V. Buromenskoho: monohrafiia [Current Problems of International Law. Liber Amicorum Professor Mykhaylo Buromenskiy in Honour of His 60th Birthday] (Feniks 2017). pp. 281–290. [in Ukrainian]. 33.Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in case of «Biao v. Denmark» (2016) Retrieved from: http://www.refworld.org/cases,ECHR,574473374.html. (accessed on: 22.04.2020). 34. Timmer А. Guest Post on Biao v Denmark. Retrieved from: http://echrblog.blogspot.com/2014/04/guest-post-on-biao-v-denmark.html) (accessed on: 08.04.2020). 35.Ersbøll, E. Biao v. Denmark – Discrimination among citizens? RSCAS 2014/79, European University Institute: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, EUDO Citizenship Observatory, July 2014. 24 р. 36. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in case of «Ramadan v. Malta» (2016) Retrieved from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163820. (accessed on: 22.04.2020). 37. Yudkivska, А. YSPL: pozbavlennja ljudyny gromadjanstwa ne porushuje standartiv Rady Jewropy. [ECtHR: Deprivation of citizenship does not violate Council of Europe standards]. Yevropejska pravda, 22 June 2016. [in Ukrainian]. 38. Dembour M.-B. Ramadan v. Malta: When will the Strasbourg Court understand that nationality is a core human rights issue? Retrieved from: https://strasbourgobservers.com/2016/07/22/ramadan-v-malta-when-will-the...). (accessed on: 22.04.2020). 39.Judgment of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in case of «Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy» (2017) Retrieved from: https://lovdata.no/static/EMDN/emd-2012-025358-2.pdf. (accessed on: 22.04.2020). 40. Act No. 91 of 5 February 1992 (Italy) Retrieved from: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/id/20122. (accessed on: 22.04.2020). 41.The right to leave country. Issue Paper by Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, 2014. 65 p.