This study develops a scenario-based optimization model for state governance of resource provision for military operations under wartime conditions, explicitly accounting for high external turbulence, binding budget constraints, time pressure, and the risk of failing critical provision standards. The study proposes a scenario-based and probability-driven analytical framework that ranks governance initiatives by expected effect and risk and selects an optimal portfolio of initiatives under given budget and risk constraints. Methodologically, external turbulence is modeled as a first-order autoregressive process capturing shock persistence, while Monte Carlo simulation is used to generate distributions of initiative outcomes under multiple plausible trajectories. Net present value is used as an integrated measure of managerial and financial effects, ensuring comparability of alternatives across the planning horizon. Downside and tail risks are explicitly quantified using Value at Risk and Conditional Value at Risk, enabling the definition of risk limits for governance decisions. Based on this framework, a portfolio approach is implemented to evaluate feasible combinations of initiatives within the budget constraint, compare portfolios on an effect–risk plane, and analyze the distribution of outcomes for the optimal portfolio. The results show that, under the baseline scenario, initiatives focused on demand forecasting and inventory policies exhibit the highest robustness, as they provide positive quantile safety margins, minimize the probability of negative outcomes, and reduce tail losses. At the same time, larger initiative portfolios may deliver higher expected effects but require stricter risk governance due to increased coordination complexity and higher variability of outcomes. The practical value lies in providing a structured decision-support framework for setting priorities, defining risk limits, and sequencing the implementation of governance initiatives supported by digital technologies. This contributes to strengthening the resilience of resource provision systems and improving the effectiveness of state decision-making in the medium-term planning horizon.
- Oudot J. M. Performance and Risks in the Defense Procurement Sector. Journal of Public Policy. 30 (2), 201–218 (2010).
- Chen L. The Impact of Performance Budgeting on Defense Resource Allocation. International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 9 (4), 151–156 (2021).
- Pedersen O., Jahre M., Norrman A. A Balancing Act: Towards a Conceptual Framework for the Governance of Buyer-Supplier Relationships in Defence Supply Chains. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies. 8 (1), 152–177 (2025).
- Antai I., Hellberg R. Surge complexities in defense industry supply chains: evidence from multiple case studies. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 36 (7), 242–261 (2025).
- Kryshtanovych M., Polovtsev O., Liubetska M., Lukashevska U., Dubin D. Modeling the planning of the potential for sustainable development of the region in the system of public administration of social security. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 18 (3), 757–762. (2023).
- Ekström T., Skoglund P. Introduction to the Special Collection on Military Logistics: The Transformation from Peace Support Operations to Territorial Defence. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies. 9 (1), 19–28 (2026).
- Webeck S., Armey L. Strategic Representations in Public Sector Strategic Planning, A Case of Strategic Planning in the U.S. Department of Defense. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration. 6 (1), 1–22 (2023).
- Dickey D. A., Fuller W. A. Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 74 (366a), 427–431 (1979).
- Smets F., Wouters R. Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles, A Bayesian DSGE Approach. American Economic Review. 97 (3), 586–606 (2007).
- Baker S. R., Bloom N., Davis S. J. Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 131 (4), 1593–1636 (2016).
- MinFin Statistics. https://index.minfin.com.ua/.
- State Statistics Service of Ukraine. https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.
- Alqahtani S., Selviaridis K., Stevenson M. Assessing the Effectiveness of Performance-Based Contracting in the Defence Sector, A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. 29 (5), 100877 (2023).
- Zsidisin G. A., Bresler A., Hazen B., Snider K. F., Wilkerson T. H. Research in Defense Logistics, Where are We and Where are We Going. Journal of Defense Analytics and Logistics. 4 (1), 3–17 (2020).
- Tagarev T. Introduction to Program-Based Defense Resource Management, Connections. The Quarterly Journal. 5 (1), 55–69 (2006).
- Elvemo K. Supply Chain Resilience in Military Operations: A Case Study Exploring Command and Control. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies. 8 (1), 40-62 (2025).
- Kryshtanovych M., Kiyanka I., Ostapiak V., Kornat L., Kuchyk O. Modeling Effective Interaction Between Society and Public Administration for Sustainable Development Policy. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 18 (8), 2555–2561 (2023).