This article explores suggestion as an effective means of instilling specific views, stereotypes, and narratives by provoking emotions, influencing individual behavior, and shaping socio-legal interactions.
It has been established that non-classical methods of influence can serve as an effective tool for legal socialization. Their impact lies in the ability to shape specific views and beliefs in citizens without triggering resistance. However, this also reveals an inherent risk, as these methods suppress critical thinking, increasing the likelihood of manipulation and necessitating caution in their application.
The susceptibility of young people to informational influence allows for the effective use of suggestive methods to cultivate stable, positive socio-legal attitudes. In our view, emotionally charged communication techniques help reduce the risk of offenses and promote lawful behavior among young people. However, the use of suggestion should only be combined with rational, classical approaches to legal education. Any informational influence on individuals must be integrated with educational practices that foster critical thinking and independent information analysis, including legal information.
Scientific research has proven that suggestive methods are particularly effective in crisis situations, such as war, natural disasters, and social conflicts. Under stressful conditions, people become more susceptible to suggestion, as anxiety limits their ability to analyze information. Messages delivered in a simple and clear manner are easily perceived, facilitating the rapid transmission of important ideas and convincing individuals of the necessity of certain behaviors.
Suggestion helps reduce panic and fear, creating a sense of control over the situation. However, excessive emotional pressure can produce the opposite effect–causing panic or triggering unexpected reactions–highlighting the need for controlled and cautious application of this method.
1. Zharovska, I. (2016). Pravova sotsializatsiia na suchasnomu etapi rozvytku pravovoi nauky [Legal socialization at the present stage of development of legal science]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu “Lvivska politekhnika”. Seriia: Yurydychni nauky. No. 855. P. 193–198. [In Ukrainian].
2. Kovalchuk, L. V., Mikhailina, T. V. (2024). Pravova sotsializatsiia v umovakh didzhytal-suspilstva [Legalsocializationintheconditionsofthedigitalsociety]. Akademichni vizii. Vyp. 36. P. 1–7. [In Ukrainian].
3. Naumenko, N. Yu. (2019). Teoretyko-metodolohichni aspekty informatsiino-psykholohichnoi bezpeky v poslidovnosti derzhava – rehion – suspilstvo – liudyna [Theoretical and methodological aspects of information and psychological security in the state – region – society – human sequence]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu. No. 3. P. 49–62. [In Ukrainian].
4. Peresh, I. Ye., Zan, M. I. Pravova sotsializatsiia osobystosti: poniattia, sposoby ta faktory [Legal socialization of the individual: concepts, methods and factors] Zakarpatski pravovi chytannia: Pravo yak instrument stiikosti ta rozvytku v umovakh suchasnykh tsyvilizatsiinykh vyklykiv. Materialy XV mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (m. Uzhhorod, 27 kvitnia 2023 roku). Chast. I. Lviv–Torun: Liha-Pres, 2023. P. 100–104. [In Ukrainian].
5. Tverdokhlib, O., Haiovych, H. (2022). Suhestiia ta yii proiavy v suchasnomu informatsiinomu prostori derzhavy [Suggestion and its manifestations in the modern information space of the state]. Naukovyi visnyk: Derzhavne upravlinnia. Vyp. 1 (11). P. 222–239. [In Ukrainian].
6. Turianytsia, V. V. (2016). Do problemy vdoskonalennia poniattia “pravova sotsializatsiia osobystosti” [Transformation of legal and globalization processes factors as legal socialization]. Porivnialno-analitychne pravo. No. 6. P. 27–29. [In Ukrainian].