In the modern world, citizens’ participation in the activities of public authorities is becoming increasingly significant. This is driven by global social, economic, and political changes, which generate both new challenges and new opportunities for contemporary democracies.
The experience of Western countries demonstrates that public engagement in the work of public authorities contributes to effective governance. The modern development of various participatory democracy mechanisms acknowledges the insufficiency of representative democracy alone, highlighting the need to supplement and significantly expand existing mechanisms.
In the context of global changes, citizens’ participation in public administration is critically important. It ensures transparency and accountability of government institutions, strengthens social cohesion, and prevents conflicts between the government and the people by fostering continuous and productive dialogue. Despite its numerous advantages, public participation in governmental activities still requires improvements in civic education, greater openness and accessibility of state institutions, and the development of a wide range of participatory mechanisms.
Analyzing the relationship between government and the citizens through the lens of participation, we affirm that civil society is the foundation of a democratic state. However, the interaction between the state and society balances between two fundamentally different dimensions. On the one hand, civil society does not exist outside the state but engages in an ongoing dialogue and cooperation, where the state limits its power in favor of society. On the other hand, state power can distance itself from civil society, gradually becoming antagonistic to the people. In this regard, there is a risk of power usurpation, where all spheres of public life are brought under state control. A well-thought-out, balanced legal framework can help address this issue, alongside civic legal activism and the continuous strengthening of democratic institutions.
1. Hanzhuk, O. (2024). Demokratiia uchasti v Ukraini: stan ta umovy realizatsii [Participatory democracy in Ukraine: status and conditions of implementation]. Ukrainskyi chasopys konstytutsiinoho prava. Vyp. 1. P. 32–41. [In Ukrainian].
2. Demianchuk, O. P. (2015). Politychna i hromadianska osvita yak politychnyi instytut: potreba formuvannia v Ukraini [Political and civic education as a political institution: the need to build in Ukraine]. Hileia. Vyp. 102. P. 412–416. [In Ukrainian].
3. Ivanova, O. V. (2023). Osoblyvosti formuvannia ta utverdzhennia v Ukraini zasad demokratii ta hromadianskoho suspilstva [Formation and establishment of democratic principles and civil society in Ukraine]. Naukovyi zhurnal “Politykus”. Vyp. 3. P. 73–77. [In Ukrainian].
4. Mamontova, E. (2018). Demokratiia uchasti – nova filosofiia upravlinnia [Participatory democracy – a new philosophy of governance]. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia. No. 1(73). P. 35–39. [In Ukrainian].
5. Neofita, D. (2024). Teoretyko-pravovyi dyskurs poniattia “partysypatyvna demokratiia [Theoretical and legal discourse of the concept of “participative democracy”]. Molodyi vchenyi. No. 3 (127). P. 67–72. [In Ukrainian].
6. Nechai, O. V. (2024). Partysypatyvna demokratiia v umovakh politychnykh zmin [Participatory democracy in the conditions of political changes]. Naukovyi zhurnal “Politykus”. Vyp. 3. P. 84–89. [In Ukrainian].
7. Nikitenko, L. O. (2022). Evoliutsiia idei partysypatyvnoi demokratii [Evolution of the idea of par-ticipative democracy]. Elektronne vydannia “Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo”. No. 6. P. 346–350. [In Ukrainian].
8. Oliinyk, O., Soloshenko, O. (2024). Formuvannia hromadianskoi kompetentnosti yak providnyi vektor diialnosti kafedry teorii i metodyky vykladannia suspilno-pravovykh dystsyplin [Formation of civic competence as a leading vector of activity of the Department of Theory and Methods of Teaching Social and Legal Disciplines]. Novyi kolehium. Vyp. 4. P. 93–98. [In Ukrainian].
9. Riabovol, L. T. (2025). Hromadianska osvita: sutnist ta znachennia v konteksti dukhovno-intelektualnoho stanovlennia osobystosti (vrakhuvannia yevropeiskoho dosvidu v Ukraini. Dukhovno-intelektualne vykhovannia i navchannia molodi v XXI stolitti) [Civic and citizenship education: essence and meaning in the context of the spiritual and intellectual formation of the individual (taking into account the European experience in Ukraine)]. Shchorichnyi mizhnarodnyi zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Vyp. 7. P. 22–26. [In Ukrainian].
10. Pieters, J. N. (2001) Participatiry democracy reconceived. Futures. 33(5). P. 407–422. [In English].