The Global Innovation Clusters: Canadian Experience of Public-Private Partnership

: pp. 402 - 413
Lviv Polytechnic National University

Purpose of the article is the research of the modern trends of global innovation clusters development in Canada that based on public-private partnership model, and to identify their features during last years. The hypothesis is that it is possible to formulate the hypothesis that at the postwar period, Ukraine would form a new innovation strategy that will push country to become global competitively and innovatively. The methods of scientific research were applied to research the global innovation system of Canada and the development of Canada's superclusters: theoretical generalization, empirical method and methods of statistical analysis. The supercluster is a new initiative promoted by the Canadian federal government to strengthen Canada’s most promising clusters and allow innovative firms to operate more productively in sourcing inputs and accessing information, knowledge, and technology. The Innovation superclusters have many positive characteristics as a new framework to rethink Canada’s innovation strategy based on public-private partnership model. The specific measures for development of industrial clusters in Ukraine at the postwar period, and elaboration of national strategy for the development of innovation system in Ukraine can be research objects in future research.

  1. Advanced Manufacturing. Available at:
  2. Aksoy A. Y., Pulizzotto D. & Beaudry C. (2022). University-Industry partnerships in the smart specialization era. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 176, 121438.
  3. Bathelt H. & Cohendet P. (2014). The Creation of Knowledge: Local Building, Global Accessing and Economic Development – Toward an Agenda. Journal of Economic Geography,14 (5), 869–882.
  4. Bathelt H. & Henn S. (2014). The Geographies of Knowledge Transfers over Distance: Toward a Typology. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46 (6), 1403–1424.
  5. Beaudry C. & Breschi S. (2006). Patenting in Clusters: A Comparison Between Firm and Cluster Level Analyses in the UK. Paper presented at the 11th Conference of the International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society, Nice, France.
  6. Beaudry C. & Solar-Pelletier L. (2020). The Superclusters Initiative: An Opportunity to Reinforce Innovation Ecosystems. IRPP Study 79. Montreal: Institute for research on Public Policy.
  7. Beaudry C. & Swann, G. M. P. (2009). Firm Growth in Industrial Clusters of the United Kingdom. Small Business Economics, 32 (4), 409–424.
  8. Beccatini G. (1990). The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-Economic Concept. In  Industrial Districts and Interfirm Cooperation in Italy, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
  9. Belderbos R., Carree M. & Lokshin B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance. Research Policy, 33, 1477–92.
  10. Blankenberg A.-K. & Buenstorf G. (2016). Regional Co-Evolution of Firm Population, Innovation and Public Research? Evidence from the West German Laser Industry. Research Policy, 45 (4), 857–868.
  11. Delgado M., Porter M. E. & Stern S. (2014). Clusters, Convergence, and Economic Performance. Research Policy, 43 (10), 1785–1799.
  12. Digital Technology Supercluster. Available at:
  13. Doloreux D. & Frigon A. (2022). The Innovation Superclusters Initiative in Canada: A new policy strategy? Science and Public Policy, 49, 148–158.
  14. Doloreux D. & Shearmur R. (2018). Moving maritime clusters to the next level: Canada’s Ocean Supercluster initiative. Marine Policy, 98/ 33–36.
  15. Doloreux D., Shearmur R. & Figueiredo, D. (2016). Quebec coastal maritime cluster: Its impact on regional economic development. Marine Policy, 71, 201–209.
  16. Foray D. (2014). Smart Specialisation: Opportunities and Challenges for Regional Innovation Policy. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  17. Gertler M. S. (2003). Tacit Knowledge and the Economic Geography of Context or The Undefinable Tacitness of Being. Journal of Economic Geography, 3 (1), 75–99.
  18. Global Innovation Clusters. URL:
  19. Government of Canada. Innovation Superclusters Initiative: Program Guide. URL: eic/site/093.nsf/eng/00003.html#toc-01.01.
  20. Helmers C. & Rogers M. (2015). The Impact of University Research on Corporate Patenting: Evidence from UK Universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40 (1), 1–24.
  21. Knubley J. (2021). Building Superclusters for Canada. URL: uploads/Superclusters_Final2.pdf.
  22. Leten B., Landoni P. & Van Looy B. (2014). Science or Graduates: How Do Firms Benefit from the Proximity of Universities? Research Policy, 43, 1398–412.
  23. Lundvall B.-Å. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. In The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope, London: Pinter Publishers.
  24. Maietta O. W. (2015). Determinants of University–Firm R&D Collaboration and Its Impact on Innovation: A Perspective from a Low-Tech Industry. Research Policy, 44, 1341–59.
  25. Njos R., Jakobsen S. E., Wiig Aslesen H. & Floysand A. (2017). Encounters between cluster theory, policy and practice in Norway: hubbing, blending and conceptual stretching, European Urban Regional Studies, 24 (3), 274–289.
  26. Njos R. & Jakobsen S. E. (2016). Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal. Regional Studies, 3 (1), 146–169.
  27. Ocean Supercluster. URL:
  28. Piore M. J. & Sabel S. F. (1984). Possibilities for Prosperity: International Keynesianism and Flexible Specialization. In The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York: Basic Books.
  29. Porter M. (1998). Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review, vol. 76 (6), 77–90.
  30. Porter M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
  31. Protein Industries Canada. URL:
  32. Scale AI. URL:
  33. Winners and losers: Liberal government’s picks for $950 million in supercluster funding. IT World Canada. URL: funding/401957.