The pressing questions of methodology of cognition of scientific theories are considered. The scientific theories of modern jurisprudence, their structure are investigated. Development of jurisprudental theories is grounded in the general structure of scientific theories. Pay attention to the organization of law as a science. The problem of cost freedom of science, that us will interest different character and touch, is considered. It be comes firmly established that every science uses the tool of logic. Here does a general scientific theory try to answer on the important aspect of question “that science is”? Those theoretical theories that allegedly operate it was possible to name only for natural sciences orother separate industries, in a counter balance to the General scientific theory, by the “Special scientific theory”.
1. Popper K. Lohyka nauchnoho yssledovanyia. M., 2004. 330 s. 2. Kelzen Hans. Сhystoe uchenye o prave / per. s nem. M. V. Antonova y S. V. Lёzova. 2-e yzd SPb.: OOO Yzdatelskyi Dom “Alef-Press”, 2015. 542 s. 3. Albert Kh. Traktat o krytycheskom razume / Per s nem., vstup. st. y prymech. Y. Z. Shyshkova. M.: Edytoryal URSS, 2003. 264 s. 4. Shopenhauэr Artur. Sobranye sochynenyi v piaty tomakh. Tom pervыi. Perevod Yu. Y. Aikhenvalda pod red. Yu. N. Popova, рrymechanyia A. L. Chanыsheva. M.:Moskovskyi klub, 1992. 340 s. 5. 5. Stopin Viacheslav. Nauka. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2015. S. 16– 25. 6. Tarskyi A. Ystyna y dokazatelstvo. Voprosы fylosofyy. 1972. № 8. S. 136–145. 7. Astafev K. Zakonы mыshlenyia v formalnoi y dyalektycheskoi lohyke. Lvov, 1968. 208 s. 8. Berdiaiev Mykola. Problema etychnoho piznannia. Systema suchasnykh metodolohii: [khrestomatiia u 4-kh tomakh] uporiad., vidp. red., perekl. A. V. Furman. Ternopil: TNEU, 2015. T. 1. S. 233–244(pereklad). 9. Bэkon F. Sochynenyia v dvukh tomakh. 2-e yspr. y dop. yzd. T. 1. Sost., obshch. red. y vstupyt, statia A. JI. Subbotyna. M.:Mыsl, 1977. 10. Zahorodnii A. Idei Volodymyra Vernadskoho i suchasnist. Svit № 9–10. 2018.