Family mediation as a mode of dispute resolution in family legal relations

Victoriya CHORNOPYSKA , Khrystyna CHORNOPYSKA "Family mediation as a mode of dispute resolution in family legal relations".

https://science.lpnu.ua/law/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-11-number-1-41...

1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Institute of Jurisprudence and Psychology
2
Lviv Polytechnic National University

The article analyzes the place of the institution of family mediation in the settlement of family legal relations in general, and family disputes in particular, substantiates the importance and effectiveness of introducing this institution into the legal system of Ukraine as an alternative to the court. It was found that family mediation is a process of resolving family disputes in a peaceful way (through understanding), in which an independent party (mediator) facilitates communication between the parties to the dispute and helps to make balanced decisions that satisfy the interests of each party. Family mediation is a flexible procedure for optimal resolution of various family disputes, which can be adapted to the specific situation of each family. The main principles of family mediation are: equality of parties, voluntary participation, confidentiality, independence and impartiality of the mediator.

Among the main advantages of family mediation, the authors identified: negotiations are carried out with the help of an independent mediator (mediator), who takes into account the position of each party and contributes to the formation of an appropriate atmosphere for further constructive communication; helps and enables the parties to independently form options for resolving the dispute, a plan of future actions, monitors the results of negotiations, taking into account the interests of not only the parties to the process, but in particular children; improves communication between parties, helps exchange ideas and information; decision options may go beyond the limits of legal remedies, while this is not possible in court; quick achievement of the result and resolution of the dispute in comparison with the court process; the solution is mutually beneficial, there are two sides to the win; relationships are terminated with less negative consequences; attention is focused on the needs of children, their interests are taken into account more, since the court examines the case on the basis of legal requirements, beyond which it cannot go, etc.

1. Tyshchenko O. O. (2018) Vykorystannia protsedury mediatsii u vyrishenni simeinykh konfliktiv. [Use of the mediation procedure in resolving family conflicts]. Kyiv. 93 з. [in Ukrainian].

2. Simeinyi kodeks Ukrainy. [Family Code of Ukraine]. Baza danykh «Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy» / VR Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2947-14#Text (Accessed: 08.02.2024). [in Ukrainian].

3. Vatras V. A. (2003) Pro sutnist simeinykh pravovidnosyn. [About the essence of family legal relations]. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho instytutu rehionalnoho upravlinnia ta prava. No 3-4. P. 111–118. [in Ukrainian].

4. Bondarenko-Zelinska N. L. (2016). Okremi aspekty alternatyvnoho vyrishennia sporiv pry vrehuliuvanni simeinykh konfliktiv. [Certain aspects of alternative dispute resolution in the settlement of family conflicts]. Pryvatne pravo i pidpryiemnytstvo. No 15. P. 158–162. [in Ukrainian].

5. Simeine pravo Ukrainy: pidruchnyk (2018). [Family law of Ukraine: textbook]. Za red. A. O. Dutko. Lviv: Lvivskyi derzhavnyi universytet vnutrishnikh sprav Publ. 480 p. [in Ukrainian].

6. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy. [Constitution of Ukraine]. Baza danykh «Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy» / VR Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text (Accessed: 08.02.2024). [in Ukrainian].

7. Haro. H. O., Spektor O. M., Vodopian T. V. (2019). Myrne vyrishennia simeinykh sporiv. [Peaceful resolution of family disputes].  Kharkiv: Faktor Publ. 80 p. [in Ukrainian].

7. Balaban R., Sintsov H. (2012). Pravovi zasady zaprovadzhennia protsedury simeinoi mediatsii u roboti orhanu opiky ta pikluvannia. [Legal basis for the introduction of the family mediation procedure in the work of the body of guardianship and guardianship]. Yurydychnyi zhurnal. No 2. P. 66–68. [in Ukrainian].

8. Yosypenko S. T. (2017) Perspektyvy instytutsionalizatsii simeinoi mediatsii u pryvatnopravovykh vidnosynakh. [Prospects of institutionalization of family mediation in private law relations]. Naukovo-informatsiinyi visnyk Ivano-Frankivskoho universytetu prava imeni Korolia Danyla Halytskoho: zhurnal. Seriia Pravo. No 3(15). P. 201–209. [in Ukrainian].

9. Holovchenko A. Rol simeinoi mediatsii v efektyvnosti vyrishennia simeinykh sporiv. [The role of family mediation in the effectiveness of resolving family disputes]. URL http://rtpp.com.ua (Accessed: 08.02.2024). [in Ukrainian].

10. Parkinson L. (2020). Family Mediation. Family Law Publishing. 518 p. [in English].

11. Danylenko P. (219) Simeina mediatsiia yak alternatyva sudu. [Family mediation as an alternative to court]. Elektronne vydannia «Iurydychna hazeta». No 38–39. URL: https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/simeyne-pravo/simeyna-media... (Accessed: 08.02.2024). [in Ukrainian].

12. Mazaraki N. A. (2018). Mediatsiia v Ukraini: teoriia ta praktyka: monohrafiia. [Mediation in Ukraine: theory and practice: monograph]. Instytut zakonodavstva Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. Kyiv: Kyivskyi natsionalnyi torhivelno-ekonomichnyi universytet Publ. 276 h. [in Ukrainian].

13. Rozman Yu. V. (2013). Mediatsiia yak alternatyvnyi sposib vyrishennia pryvatno-pravovykh sporiv. [Mediation as an alternative way to resolve private legal disputes]. Aktualni problemy polityky. 2013. No 49. P. 245–256. [in Ukrainian].

14. Mediatsiia u profesiinii diialnosti yurysta: pidruchnyk (2019). [Mediation in the professional activity of a lawyer: a textbook]. T. Bilyk, R. Havryliuk, I. Horodyskyi ta in.; za red. N. Krestovskoi, L. Romanadze. Odesa: Ekolohiia Publ. 456 p. [in Ukrainian].

15. Parneta O., Fedyk S. (2021). Mediatsiia yak sposib vyrishennia simeinykh sporiv. [Mediation as a way to resolve family disputes]. Aktualni problemy pravoznavstva. No 1 (25). P.100–106. [in Ukrainian].