Natural-legal concepts characterize human rights as the manifestation of the values of
human existence and the manifestation of objective needs. However, one should not ignore the
fact that the understanding of the genesis and essence of human rights was evaluated
extensively on the basis of two anti-ethical positions, and positivist approach to the
understanding of human rights was a certain antipode. Under the conditions of the legitimate
legal understanding, the concepts of the state and the law dominate the concept of human
rights, whereas in the second sense, the dominant is the individualand his natural rights.
The modern concept of human rights must be based on the modern (postmodern)
philosophy of man, taking into account all the latest developments in human knowledge.
Ignoring them, or refusing them, is the path to «false» law, a kind of degradation, a road to the
past, devoid of a humanistic dimension, which is understood as a renunciation of a person, a
betrayal of it, to which it deservesnothing.
1. Manuliak Ye.I. Do pytannia pro genezu i poniattia prav liudyny [On the issue of the genesis andconcept of human rights. Collection of scientific works. Series «Legal and Political Sciences»]. Zbirnyknaukovykh prats. Seriia «Iurydychni i politychni nauky». Vyp. 16. K. : In-t derzhavy i prava im. V. M. KoretskohoNAN Ukrainy, 2002. P. 30-35. 2. Bratasiuk M. H. Suchasna kontseptsiia prav liudyny:metodolohiia doslidzhennia. [Contemporary Human Rights Concept: Research Methodology] Naukovyivisnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. 2013. Vyp. 4. T. 1. P. 36-40. 3. Bordun N.Antropolohichni ta sotsiokulturni zasady zakhystu prav liudyny. [Anthropological and socio-culturalprinciples of human rights protection.]Publichne pravo. 2012. No. 2. P. 310-316. 4. Samovych Yu. V. Oformyrovanyy polytyko-pravovыkh kontseptsyi prav cheloveka.[About the formation of political andlegalconcepts of human rights.] Kultura i obshchestvo: Ynternet-zhurnal MHUKY. Mosk. hos. un-tkulturы y yskusstv. M.: MHUKY, 2006. No. hos. rehystratsyy 0420600016. URL: http://www.eculture.ru/Articles/2006/Samovitch.pdf. 5. Kruk O. Problemni pytannia realizatsii demokratychnykh pravi svobod liudyny.[ Problematic issues of realization of democratic rights and freedoms] Pravo Ukrainy.2007. No. 5. P. 20-24. 6. Rabinovych P. M. Zahalna teoriia prava ta derzhavy: stan, tendentsii. [Generaltheory of law and state: state, trends] Pravo Ukrainy. 2012. No. 3-4. P. 364-374.7. Hudyma D. A. Pravaliudyny: antropoloho-metodolohichni zasady doslidzhennia [Human rights: anthropological andmethodological principles of researc]: dys. kan. yuryd. nauk : 12.00.12. L., 2007. 288 p. 8. Sartr Zh.-P.https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.FTR4.12082007.12Эkzystentsyalyzm - эtohumanyzm. Sumerky bohov. [Existentialism - this is humanism. Twilight of thegods.] M., 1989. P. 319-344. 9. Khaidehher M. Pysmo o humanyzme. Myr fylosofyy [Letter of Humanism.The World of Philosophy]: Knyha dlia chtenyia. M.: Polytyzdat, 1991. Ch. 2. Chelovek. Obshchestvo.Kultura. P.71-76. 10. Berdiaiev N. A. Problema cheloveka [The problem of man] (K postroenyiukhrystyanskoi antropolohyy). URL: http://www.vehi.net/ berdyaev/chelovek.html. 11. Hubar O. Systematyzatsiiapryntsypiv kontseptsii prav liudyny. [Systematization of the principles of the concept ofhuman rights.] Antropolohiia prava: filosofskyi ta yurydychnyi vymiry: (stan, problemy, perspektyvy):materialy Tretoho Vseukrainskoho kruhloho stolu (Lviv, 23-24 lystopada 2007 r.). L., 2008. P. 110-124.12. Sprava «Odiuvr proty Frantsii» [Case «Odiuvr v. France»](«Odiuvr v. France»). Yeropeiskyi sud zprav liudyny. Materialy praktyky (1993-2003 rr.). Pratsi Lvivskoi laboratorii z prav liudyny ihromadianyna Naukovo-doslidnoho instytutu derzhavnoho budivnytstva ta mistsevoho samovriaduvanniaAkademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy. Redkol. P. M. Rabinovych [ta in.]. Seriia II. Komentari prav izakonodavstva. Vyp.4. K.: Feniks, 2004. P. 309-32.