The Role of Education in Overcoming the Negative Information Impacts Under the Post-True Era (Review Article)

2021;
: 33-38
https://doi.org/10.23939/shv2021.01.033
Received: January 15, 2021
Accepted: April 10, 2021
Authors:
1
Lviv Polytechnic National University

The peculiarities of the post-truth interpretation, its key political manifestations and its impact on modern global society have been analyzed. It is asserted about the importance of education in combating the negative effects of post-truth political practice. It is argued that the key mechanism for counteracting the spread of post-truth practices in the information sphere, reducing its destructive impact is the formation of the need of citizens to combat misinformation and strengthen their ability to process, including decode, the information, to separate its useful components from harmful ones. It has been found that researchers of the problems caused by the emergence of the post-truth phenomenon propose to consider them within four approaches, each of which uses different options to analyze the challenges posed by thinking within the paradigm of post-truth. It is about such approaches related to the analysis of ways of knowing: not knowing how to know; fallible ways of knowing; not caring about truth (enough) and disagreeing about how to know. Within each approach, researchers propose: (a) an explanation of how people’s ways of knowing can influence trends in the post-truth phenomenon in general, (b) an analysis of how education might aggravate this problem and (c) suggestions on how education can mitigate the problem. It is emphasized that the phenomenon of post-truth arises at the intersection of different contexts, it is, therefore, necessary to look for ways and develop educational guidelines to address social and political issues, and encourage public participation that will provide individuals with political practices that empirically challenge the post-truth thesis. It is determined the necessity for closer cooperation between politicians, social workers, scholars and educators to develop interdisciplinary guidelines that can respond to the challenges of the post-truth era, contribute to the improvement of thinking about the problems that exist in the post-truth world.

  1. Anish, J. (2019). “A truth called Post-truth. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/33846217/A_truth_called_Post-truth
  2. Barzilai, S., Chinn, A. C. (2020). A Review of Educational Responses to the “Post-Truth” Condition: Four Lenses on “Post-Truth” Problems. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 107-119.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1786388
  3. Bimber, B., Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2020). The Unedited Public Sphere. New Media & Society, 22(4), 700-715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893980
  4. Carrera, P. (2018). The Stratagems of Post-Truth. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 73, 1469-1482 [online]. Retrieved from http://www.revistalatinacs.org/073paper/1317/76en.html
  5. Crilley, R., Chaterje-Doody, P. (2018). Security Studies in the age of ‘Post-Truth’ Politics: In Defence of Poststructuralism. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323451926_Security_studies_in_the_age_of_'post-truth'_politics_in_defence_of_poststructuralism  https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2018.1441634
  6. Garland, R. (2018). “Is Post-Truth Another Word for Political Spin or a Radical Departure from It? Evidence from behind the scenes in UK government communications: 1997-2015. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 14 (3), 333-350. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.14.3.333_1
  7. Ghayrat, Sh. (2017). Information War: The War for the “Truthful” High Ground. SAGE International. Retrieved from https://css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/resources/docs/Sage-Information%20War.pdf
  8. Herzinger, R. (8 November, 2019). “Success of Extremist Anti-Western Movements is the Result of Disinformation Influence”. [In Ukrainian]. Ukrainian Week. Retrieved from https://tyzhden.ua/News/237466
  9. Lazareva, A. (2018). “On Tiptoe Over the Abyss”. [In Ukrainian]. Ukrainian Week. Retrieved from https://tyzhden.ua/World/210171
  10. Leith, S.(2017). “Nothing like the truth”. TLS. Retrieved from https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/post-truth-sam-leith/
  11. Morgan, S. (2018). Fake news, Disinformation, Manipulation and Online Tactics to Undermine Democracy. Journal of Cyber Policy, 3(1), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2018.1462395
  12. Nayef, Al-Rodhan. (2017). Post-Truth Politics, the Fifth Estate and the Securitization of Fake News. Global Policy Journal, Retrieved from https://css.ethz.ch/en/services/digital-library/articles/article.html/cf02167f-4633-41dc-a857-a4da299b9306
  13. Reichstadt, R. (2020). “Conspiracy is not a Psychological Pathology, It Is a Political Project”. [In Ukrainian]. Ukrainian Week. Retrieved from https://tyzhden.ua/World/239586
  14. “The Post-Truth World. Yes, I’d Lie to You”. (2016). The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21706498-dishonesty-politics-nothing-new-manner-which-some-politicians-now-lie-and
  15. “Woke” and “Post-Truth” added to Oxford English Dictionary. (2017). BBC. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/40414375/woke-and-post-truth-added-to-oxford-english-dictionary
  16. Word of The Year 2016 Is... (2016). Oxford Dictionaries. Retrieved from https://www.lexico.com/definition/post-truth