This article presents an interdisciplinary study of the architecture of the Palace of Justice in Lviv as a spatial embodiment of the power and legitimacy of justice. The analysis focuses on how the architectural and artistic solutions of the building shape the symbolic representation of law, state authority, and justice. A legal approach is applied to interpret the material environment of the judicial institution as a communicative space that reflects and simultaneously forms legal meanings.
Special attention is paid to the compositional logic of the building, the layout of the courtroom, and the sculptural decoration of the façade, which represent the ideas of legal order, dignity, and the rule of law. The influence of imperial architectural heritage on contemporary perceptions of the judiciary in Ukraine is examined, particularly in the context of historical memory, political aesthetics, and the demand for justice in a democratic society.
The Palace of Justice in Lviv is analyzed as an example of late 19th-century imperial architectural policy, which aimed to endow institutions of public law with visual persuasiveness and ideological stability. A spatial-symbolic analysis of the court as a cultural heritage object reveals hidden meanings that continue to influence the perception of judicial authority in modern Ukrainian society.
The text addresses issues of continuity in legal and visual traditions, the transformation of imperial codes in a postcolonial context, and the challenges faced by architectural representations of law in a democratic state. This approach allows for an expanded discourse on law, incorporating spatial and visual dimensions as important elements of the legitimization and functioning of legal institutions.
This article may be of interest to researchers in law, philosophy, cultural studies, as well as those studying the symbolic dimension of state institutions.
1. Rusevych, T. V. (2013). Mova arkhitektury – symboly abo stereotypy [The language of architecture – symbols or stereotypes]. Arkhitekturnyi visnyk KNUBA, (1). Р. 126–134. [Іn Ukrainian].
2. Stalin ta Hitler: znaidy vidminnosti [Stalin and Hitler: Find the differences]. (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://www.volynnews.com/messages/3045/ (Аccessed: 10.04.2025). [Іn Ukrainian].
3. Mystetstvo Ukrainy: Entsyklopediia: v 5 t. T. 1. A – V [Art of Ukraine: Encyclopedia in 5 vols. Vol. 1: A– V]. (1995). Kyiv: Ukrainska entsyklopediia. (Аccessed: 10.04.2025). [Іn Ukrainian].
4. Istoriia ukrainskoho mystetstva: u 5 t. T. 1.: Mystetstvo pervysnoi doby ta starodavnoho svitu [History of Ukrainian Art: іn 5 vols. Vol. 1: Art of the Primitive Age and the Ancient World]. К., 2008. Р. 7–10. [Іn Ukrainian].
5. President of Ukraine. (1996, July 27). Pro zabezpechennia sudiv prymishchenniamy: Rozporiadzhennia No. 208/96-рп [On ensuring court premises: Presidential decree]. Retrieved from: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/208/96-%D1%80%D0%BF (Аccessed: 10.04.2025). [Іn Ukrainian].
6. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1994, February 24). Pro zabezpechennia diialnosti sudiv: Postanova No. 4019- XII [On ensuring the activity of courts: Resolution]. Retrieved from: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4019-12 (Аccessed: 10.04.2025). [Іn Ukrainian].
7. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2001, June 21). Pro zatverdzhennia Prohramy zabezpechennia sudiv nalezhnymy prymishchenniamy na 2002–2006 roky: Postanova No. 692 [On approval of the Program to provide courts with appropriate premises for 2002–2006]. Retrieved from: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/692-2001- %D0%BF (Аccessed: 10.04.2025). [Іn Ukrainian].
8. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2006, July 4). Pro zatverdzhennia Derzhavnoi prohramy zabezpechennia sudiv nalezhnymy prymishchenniamy na 2006–2010 roky: Postanova No. 918 [On approval of the State Program for providing courts with appropriate premisesfor 2006–2010]. Retrieved from: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/918- 2006-%D0%BF (Аccessed: 10.04.2025). [Іn Ukrainian].
9. Biriulov, O. (Ed.). (2008). Arkhitektura Lvova: Chas i styli. XIII–XXI st. [Architecture of Lviv: Time and styles. 13th–21st centuries]. Lviv: Tsentr Yevropy. [Іn Ukrainian].
10. Chekhovskyi, I. H. (2007). Prohulianka Chernivtsiamy ta Bukovynoiu. Putivnyk [A walk through Chernivtsi and Bukovyna. Guidebook]. Kyiv: Baltiia-Druk. [Іn Ukrainian].
11. Lukych, V. (1884). Illiustrovanyi kalendar tovarystva “Prosvita” na rik zvychainyi 1885 [Illustrated calendar of the “Prosvita” society for the regular year 1885]. Lviv. [Іn Ukrainian].
12. Illiustrovanyi kalendar tovarystva “Prosvita” na rik zvychainyi 1899. (1899). [Illustrated calendar of the “Prosvita” society for the regular year 1899]. Lviv. [Іn Ukrainian].
13. Kachor, I., Kachor, L. (2004). Lviv kriz viky [Lviv through the centuries]. Lviv: Tsentr Yevropy. [Іn Ukrainian].
14. Horak, R. (2005–2006). Ranni mandrivky Boikivshchynoiu Ivana Franka v ioho tvorchosti ta epistolarii [Early journeys of Ivan Franko through Boikivshchyna in his works and letters]. Etnos i kultura, (2–3). P. 5–15. [Іn Ukrainian].
15. Biriulov, Yu. (2010). Zakharevychi: Tvortsi stolychnoho Lvova [The Zakharevych family: Creators of capital Lviv]. Lviv: Tsentr Yevropy. [Іn Ukrainian].
16. Melnyk, I., Masik, R. (2012). Pamiatnyky ta memorialni tablytsi mista Lvova [Monuments and memorial plaques of Lviv]. Lviv: Apriori. [Іn Ukrainian].
17. Rudenko, A. (Ed.), Biriulov, Yu. (Ed. & layout). (1999). Lviv. Turystychnyi putivnyk [Lviv. Tourist guide]. Lviv: Tsentr Yevropy. [Іn Ukrainian].
18. Chaikivska, M. (n. d.). Ti, shcho zakonno zakhyshchaiut liudei vid zakonu: sudovi protsesy nad chlenamy UVO [Those who legally protect people from the law: court trials of UVO members]. Retrieved from: https://photolviv.in.ua/ti-scho-zakonno-zahyschayut-lyudej-vid-zakonu-su... (Аccessed: 10.04.2025). [Іn Ukrainian].
19. Birchak, V. (2018, October 21). Ubyty odnoho, shchob vriatuvaty milioni. Atentat Mykoly Lemyka [Kill one to save millions. The assassination by Mykola Lemyk]. Retrieved from: https://www.istpravda.com.ua/articles/ 2018/10/21/153118/ (Аccessed: 10.04.2025). [Іn Ukrainian].