Abstract. The article examines the issue of performance evaluation civil servants in the context of improving the civil service. It is emphasized that the evaluation of civil servants is an important element in management process which ensures transparency, accountability and compliance the official duties performance with the established standards. At the same time, an effective evaluation system should take into account current challenges and trends, including digitalization, increasing demands on the quality of services, and the need to adapt to changes in society.
It is stated that performance appraisal civil servants requires a systematic approach, given that it is an important tool for ensuring the effectiveness their activities. The use systematic approach to evaluation allows taking into account both professional competencies and personal qualities of employees, which contributes to improving the public administration quality. In addition, it is important to introduce transparent and objective evaluation mechanisms, which is a key factor in increasing trust in the civil service system and promotes a culture responsibility among employees. Equally important is the integration modern methods, including, in particular, a competency-based approach, digital tools and 360-degree feedback, which allows for a more accurate and comprehensive assessment the professional performance of employees.
It is emphasized that effective assessment helps to identify the strengths and areas for development each employee, which allows for the formation individual plans for professional development and stimulates motivation for quality performance. It is emphasized that the results of the evaluation should be used not only for individual work with employees, but also for strategic personnel policy planning in public authorities in general.
1. Law of Ukraine. On Civil Service від 10 грудня 2015 р. No. 889-VIII. (2016). Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, (4), аrt. 43.
2. Kornuta, L. M. (2024). The concept of “employee” in the public and civil service: categorical and comparative characteristics. Law and Public Administration, (1), р. 349–356. DOI: 10.32782/pdu.2024.1.49
3. Hodina, M. A. (2020). Content, structure and significance of professional development of civil servants in the system of measures of organizational and legal support of public service in Ukraine. Scientific Notes of Vernadsky TNU. Series: Public Administration, 31(70)(2), р. 18–23. DOI: 10.24144/2307-3322.2022.75.3.7
4. Nizhnik, N. R., Pashko, L. A. (2005). Evaluation as a basis for human resource management in the field of public administration. University Scientific Notes, іssues 1–2, р. 244–251. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Unzap_2005_1-2_40
5. Nizhnyk, N. R. (2007). Problems of the present day public administration in Ukraine. University Scientific Notes, (3), p. 14–19.
6. Maltyz, V. V., Tarasenko, Y. V. (2018). Personnel assessment: modern methods and tools for its implementation. Economy and Society, (19), р. 484–489.
7. Mishenina, G. A., Kobushko, Y. V. (2022). Monitoring and evaluation of management activities: lecture notes. Sumy: Sumy State University, 138 p.
8. Melnyk, V. I. (2022). Personnel management in the systemof civil service in Ukraine. (Doctoral dissertation). Odesa: National University “Odesa Polytechnic”, 289 p. DOI: 10.30888/2663-5712.2023-18-03-012
9. Shevchenko, S. O. (2015). Methods of professional evaluation of public service personnel. Public Administration: Improvement and Development, (9). Retrieved from: http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=882
10.Kolomoyets, T. (2018). Annual performance appraisal of civil servants in Ukraine: is the chosen regulatory model perfect? Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, (11), 96–104.