Ukrainian language

The article analyzes the difficulties and problems underlying the translation into Ukrainian of Latin rhetorical terms, used and explained in a treatise “On the rhetorical art” by Theophanous Prokopovych (1707), taking into account modern tendencies in scientific and technical terminology organizing. Based on the conducted research and the review of current tendencies in the Ukrainian scientific style a conclusion has been made concerning the similarity of numerous phenomena and processes in the scientific language of the XVIII century and nowadays.

The author outlines the features of the latency and explication of the literary term, peculiarities of the literary terminological system using the works of Ivan Denisyuk, and shows individual features of creation and functioning of a terminological system in the scholarly text.

The article contains an analysis of the basic structural models of the made terms with a component arch in modern Ukrainian and the onomasiological analysis of these term-words combinations is presented.

The features of term-word-combinations of cinematographic art of modern Ukrainian are analized in the article. The specific of their semantics is reflected, the most typical structural-semantical models, the compound names of which are formed, are distinguished.

The article is dedicated to the analysis of the processes that took place in Ukrainian musical terminology. Musical historic terms, archaic names and synonyms that went out of active use. New music alterms such as borrowings, derivative words, dialectic words enriched themusical terminology. Availability of such processes let us confirm that Ukrainian musical terminology is in the continuous development

The article is devoted to the study of the structural organization of term phrases in Ukrainian electric power engineering terminology and the identification of the most productive term phrase models. Particular attention is paid to the models of compound electric power engineering terms, with two-and three-term phrases having been analyzed.

The article is dedicated to the analyses of the genus-species relationship of the compound names with the seme ‘water’ in the scientific and technical terminology.

The article continues the series of the author’s publications devoted to studying of Ukrainian physics terminology antroponyms. It deals with the problem of antonymy of antroponymic physical terms and its variance

The article deals with tre problems of the modern Ukrainian terminology, including the issue of genitive case flexions in computer terms of tre second-declension masculines using. Specific attention is paid to the use of terminological unit macro, where there are doubts in the choice of flexion.

The article dwells upon phenomenon of syntactic variance in the modern Ukrainian scientific and technical terminology. The research analyzes reasons for appearance of syntactic variants terms. The ways to avoid parallel names of this type are suggested.